PLEASE Hondata!
#41
What really sucks is Hondata can't give the straight answer were looking for, which I can understand (but can still bitch about). Its been said its on the way, or that they're a kidnapped honda engineer away from solving the VIN number problem. However, if you read between the lines, the 05 5at reflash is about as real as unicorns. Fuck it, go get something else for your car.
#42
Originally Posted by CarbonGray Earl
What really sucks is Hondata can't give the straight answer were looking for, which I can understand (but can still bitch about). Its been said its on the way, or that they're a kidnapped honda engineer away from solving the VIN number problem. However, if you read between the lines, the 05 5at reflash is about as real as unicorns. Fuck it, go get something else for your car.
#43
Originally Posted by drunkenbuda
You know, i think i am just gonna wait till the TSX coupe comes out. I'll F#$ken trade it in. Damn Hondata takes to long.
#44
Originally Posted by CarbonGray Earl
What really sucks is Hondata can't give the straight answer were looking for, which I can understand (but can still bitch about). Its been said its on the way, or that they're a kidnapped honda engineer away from solving the VIN number problem. However, if you read between the lines, the 05 5at reflash is about as real as unicorns. Fuck it, go get something else for your car.
That would make it awfully tempting to mess with my internals. (My tranny doesn't count as "internals") I'd be all over the Hytech setup (RH/C/IM) that's being released for the RSX. Additionally, the newer Kpros have added functions where I can fix my speedo error from my RSX-S gears.
I always get jealous when reading the forums at clubrsx and k20a. Oh well, at least I have an idea what the K24A2 is capable of.
#45
Originally Posted by Black_6spd
I always get jealous when reading the forums at clubrsx and k20a. Oh well, at least I have an idea what the K24A2 is capable of.
I love this engine, it's a real technological marvel, but not having the crucial ingredient to wring all the potential out of it is extremely frustrating. I love the TSX too...aside from being FWD it is my favorite car yet. Sadly, it'll probably be relegated to being my daily driver now that I'm getting a new "project" that I can actually do cool stuff with.
#46
Originally Posted by Black_6spd
I have a feeling Kpro for the TSX is more likely before a 05AT reflash is done.
Originally Posted by Black_6spd
I always get jealous when reading the forums at clubrsx and k20a. Oh well, at least I have an idea what the K24A2 is capable of.
#49
Originally Posted by drunkenbuda
Just called Hondata, Same answer " we're working on it ". I need a real answer, whats taking so long?
The TSX isn't exactly a huge market compared to something along the lines of the Civic Si.
#50
Originally Posted by hondata
05 TSX Auto Reflash:
For the maths majors amongs you. Imagine you have a combination lock with 1.2 times 10 to the power of 16 combinations and you can try one combination per second. What is the average time required to find the combination?
Although this is not the only way it may give you some insight into my oft repeated statement"
Due to the nature of the work we do we cannot give you any timeframe on any ECU reflash"
If Honda were to give us the information and we had an 05 TSX Auto, we could have the reflash done in 48 hours. That however is unlikely.
My recommendation for 05 Auto owners at this point is to consider a reflashed 04 Auto ECU coded to your keys.
For the maths majors amongs you. Imagine you have a combination lock with 1.2 times 10 to the power of 16 combinations and you can try one combination per second. What is the average time required to find the combination?
Although this is not the only way it may give you some insight into my oft repeated statement"
Due to the nature of the work we do we cannot give you any timeframe on any ECU reflash"
If Honda were to give us the information and we had an 05 TSX Auto, we could have the reflash done in 48 hours. That however is unlikely.
My recommendation for 05 Auto owners at this point is to consider a reflashed 04 Auto ECU coded to your keys.
120 raised to the power 16 is the following
L = number of levels (or values) within factors = 120
k = number of factors within experiment = 16
So, using the classic 1-FAAT (1 factor at a time) technique, you need 18,400,000,000,000 trials for this experiment. However, I have serious doubts that Hondata ran a full factorial. They most likely ran a fractional factorial where they were able to reduce the number of levels(usually to only 2) and possible interactions.
With that said, they could've ran a two-level fractional factorial where only certain interactions were accounted for. This significantly reduced the amount of trials and resources needed to crack the ECU.
Sarcasm aside, 16 factors makes sense to me. I remember reading that the vtec crossover point was controlled in multiple values within the ECU code. How much more for fuel maps and other areas?
#51
Originally Posted by Black_6spd
120 raised to the power 16 is the following
L = number of levels (or values) within factors = 120
k = number of factors within experiment = 16
So, using the classic 1-FAAT (1 factor at a time) technique, you need 18,400,000,000,000 trials for this experiment.
L = number of levels (or values) within factors = 120
k = number of factors within experiment = 16
So, using the classic 1-FAAT (1 factor at a time) technique, you need 18,400,000,000,000 trials for this experiment.
#52
LOL. I was hoping another nerd would chime in.
I had my doubts whether or not fractional factorial would work for Hondata for the reasons you stated. I also don't think they'd be able to reduce it to a 2-level factorial. Regardless, you've got to hand it to them for being able to crack any of the ECU's.
I had my doubts whether or not fractional factorial would work for Hondata for the reasons you stated. I also don't think they'd be able to reduce it to a 2-level factorial. Regardless, you've got to hand it to them for being able to crack any of the ECU's.
#53
Originally Posted by Black_6spd
LOL. I was hoping another nerd would chime in.
I had my doubts whether or not fractional factorial would work for Hondata for the reasons you stated. I also don't think they'd be able to reduce it to a 2-level factorial. Regardless, you've got to hand it to them for being able to crack any of the ECU's.
I wonder what the actual sticking point in the ECU they haven't gotten is. CGEarl said something about a VIN?
#54
Originally Posted by jpt
I actually would have guessed that making a replacement ECU would be easier than reverse-engineering the software on the factory one enough to make a usable reflash -- if you make your own unit, all you need to do is figure out the protocol for the connected sensors and devices (much easier to do in general because you can figure each out independently) and then write your own software. Nobody does this, though, so presumably it's pretty easy to figure out the software in most cases
#55
Originally Posted by jpt
Nobody does this, though, so presumably it's pretty easy to figure out the software in most cases
#56
Originally Posted by Tsx536
I think you're oversimplifying this. Making a complete plug and play ECU replacement that maintains all of the current functionality (guages, a/c, DBW) wouldn't be easy. There is a lot of complex logic within the ECU controlling the engine and telling it how to behave properly based on the status of many different sensors.
We would still be able to have gauges, A/C, etc like you mentioned. This is the route they took for the 05/06 K-pro rather than messing around all over again. However, they still have to buy an 03/04 primary O2 sensor.
#58
Originally Posted by Black_6spd
Just forget cracking the 2005 AT or reflashing ours for other setups. I'd rather just get an 04 RSX-S ECU and one of these babies:
We would still be able to have gauges, A/C, etc like you mentioned. This is the route they took for the 05/06 K-pro rather than messing around all over again. However, they still have to buy an 03/04 primary O2 sensor.
We would still be able to have gauges, A/C, etc like you mentioned. This is the route they took for the 05/06 K-pro rather than messing around all over again. However, they still have to buy an 03/04 primary O2 sensor.
#59
Is it possible to use the RSX-S ECU on TSX? Both engines are similar but not the same. If there's K-Pro avaliable, and the RSX-S can use it on TSX without the lose of all neccessary function such as A/C or guage, then it's a good investment.
#60
Originally Posted by Black_6spd
Just forget cracking the 2005 AT or reflashing ours for other setups. I'd rather just get an 04 RSX-S ECU and one of these babies:
We would still be able to have gauges, A/C, etc like you mentioned. This is the route they took for the 05/06 K-pro rather than messing around all over again. However, they still have to buy an 03/04 primary O2 sensor.
We would still be able to have gauges, A/C, etc like you mentioned. This is the route they took for the 05/06 K-pro rather than messing around all over again. However, they still have to buy an 03/04 primary O2 sensor.
#61
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
The RSX K-Pro will control our engine, but you'll still lose your gauges, HVAC, cruise control, and VSA.
#67
Originally Posted by hrj_1985
i guess, we (05 AT owners) have to trade our cars to 06 tsx..
#71
Originally Posted by kwjustin89
Ahh but why is it only the 05 AT reflash that is impossible to crack? Did they just get lucky with all other TSX, RSX, 2006 Si, etc. reflashes??
#73
Originally Posted by kwjustin89
Why in the hell would they decide to do that in JUST the 05 AT ECU's and not any other previous OR future ECU's. That is just plain strange to me.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
urbtsx
1G TSX Performance Parts & Modifications
9
03-04-2017 06:53 PM
mrkingstonvi
Member Cars for Sale
2
02-22-2016 01:53 PM
k6biv
Member Cars for Sale
1
09-10-2015 06:37 PM