XM subscription vs HD FM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-21-2007, 08:42 PM
  #41  
Old Man Yelling at Clouds
 
1Louder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 57
Posts: 16,973
Received 7,362 Likes on 3,906 Posts
I've had Sirius (prev. car) and XM now in the new. I liked Sirius channel selection over XM, but it's OK. Anything is better than commercials and DJ's. When I'm in my wife's car listentening to FM, I can't stand it.

I've found a good rotation of 6 channels that I like and just keep moving through them. This helps reduce noticing if they play a loop over and over (I've never noticed it). The talk channels, and on occasion a music channel that's playing a special segment, will have commercials. But the vast majority of music channels are clear.
Old 04-22-2007, 01:34 AM
  #42  
Instructor
 
Roffles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Age: 43
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by vidgamer
Most of the time, I'd say that FM sounds better. This goes double if what you say is true about 40kbps for music! I usually think of 64kbps as scraping the bottom. No wonder they don't want to publicize it.





How will XM be able to change? There's this huge installed base of hardware, and unless that already supports VBR...? I mean, if it does support it, why wouldn't XM have done that in the first place?
I don't know all that much about how it is streamed, but VBR is a software encoding method. It has nothing to do with hardware...so there may be a chance for a transition to happen. And about my preferance for XM audio over FM, I'm talking about the clarity. I have always experienced random annoying static when listening to FM radio. Add that annoyance to the 10 minute commercial pauses and the complete lack of musical selection and it becomes ammusing to hear anyone defend FM. FM is deprecated.
Old 04-22-2007, 10:41 AM
  #43  
Advanced
 
wenge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So far I'm fairly happy with XM, but on some channels the slow-bandwidth compression leaves some truly annoying artifacts. If every channel sounded like 100-103 (classical) I'd be all over it... I'll probably end up getting it because it's nice to be able to tune into a genre. The talk stations are just okay; I usually listen to my local NPR which has significantly better fidelity* than the high compression on the talk stations on XM.

--W

* They cheat: they mix down to mono, which on FM, which essentially doubles their bandwidth. It's talk radio, who cares about stereo.
Old 04-22-2007, 10:43 AM
  #44  
Advanced
 
wenge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you're not aware, some of the channels (specifically those with "cm" in the name) (a) have ads and (b) are programmed by ClearChannel. xL is "explicit language," if you were wondering.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:40 AM.