View Poll Results: Would you sacrifice some handling, for some more power?
Yes
21
30.43%
No
48
69.57%
Voters: 69. You may not vote on this poll

Would you sacrifice some handling, for some power?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-30-2003, 12:49 AM
  #41  
Suzuka Master
 
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Age: 43
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Lung Fu Mo Shi
....the TSX is...stealing market share from itself....
How does that work?
Old 10-30-2003, 10:12 PM
  #42  
Racer
 
dnl2ba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I wanted more power and less handling, I would've just bought the Accord EX V6 with navigation.

Originally posted by AKay
I knowwwwwwww your not talking about me nor calling me an ignoramus. I know what drive by wire is and i was talking about tuning issues. If you need reference material read the june issue of import tuner and the article on Bisi Ezerioha if i had a scanner i would scan the page for you mr almighty flamer.
AKay
Seems pretty clear to me that he wanted the explanation for himself.
Old 10-30-2003, 10:19 PM
  #43  
Moderator Alumnus
 
provench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Raleigh, NC
Age: 51
Posts: 4,858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by dnl2ba
If I wanted more power and less handling, I would've just bought the Accord EX V6 with navigation.
Well ... the problem is you get the bonus of the 4-door Accord being beat by the ugly stick :busted: and being a bit bigger or a think at least a few of us might have done just that.
Old 10-30-2003, 10:26 PM
  #44  
Porn Connoisseur
 
AKay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Paterson, NJ
Age: 46
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by dnl2ba
If I wanted more power and less handling, I would've just bought the Accord EX V6 with navigation.



Seems pretty clear to me that he wanted the explanation for himself.

Dammit!
This is why the net can be so informal.
My apologies if this was the case.
AKay
Old 10-31-2003, 03:21 AM
  #45  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,376
Received 632 Likes on 508 Posts
The Euro Accord has the same 2.4 engine as the TSX but in Euro trim it makes 190 HP. 0-100kph (62mph) is 7.9s for the 6 sp and 9.0s for the auto. I assume the type R everyone is talking about is the old Accord - no type R for the new one (yet) The above numbers are for the Type-S as its called (vs the base 2.0L 155HP engine).
It's not just with Honda, but all Euro cars will be getting somewhat draconian (by past Euro standards) emission requirements in the next few years (imagine all of US having CA standards). That will affect what kind of engines/HP will be available for this car. As an alternative, Honda is offering the i-CDI diesel. While it has only 140HP, it has a mountain of torque (50% more at 1/2 the RPM) and gets almost twice the milage of the Type-S Accord and emissions are less.
I don't think any Euro Accord ever had or will have a 6 cyl engine - that's reserved for the Legend as its still called outside of NA.
Old 10-31-2003, 08:01 AM
  #46  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
There is a Euro R which is our TSX but equipped with the 2.0 220HP K series engine from the JDM ITR.
Old 10-31-2003, 09:35 AM
  #47  
Racer
 
dnl2ba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think any Euro Accord ever had or will have a 6 cyl engine - that's reserved for the Legend as its still called outside of NA.
Isn't the RL the Legend? Both it and the TL have V6s. Aren't both available outside of NA?
Old 11-06-2003, 09:11 PM
  #48  
Banned
 
Iceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Age: 53
Posts: 620
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What I want is, lighter wheels + better tires. That way I get a faster car AND better handling.
Old 11-06-2003, 10:58 PM
  #49  
Burning Brakes
 
briny319's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 856
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Only if there was a slight decrease in handling and a major increase in power. Overall I'm very pleased with the power and handling of the tsx.
Old 11-07-2003, 02:03 AM
  #50  
My other "car" is a 4x4
 
XPLORx4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Age: 55
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the TSX had been designed to give up a little handling, but got some extra power for it, there would only be posts like "would you give up power for better handling" or "is the <insert desired HP here> worth the extra $2500?" or "would you give up a little power to get better fuel economy"?

I think the bottom line is that, no matter what products we're offered by the automotive industry, it could always be "better".

Example: Name your "perfect" car. (It must already exist!) I bet one or more others could point out deficiencies in it, making it not quite so "perfect" anymore.

With the TSX, we've got a car that is an excellent blend of reliability, fuel economy, value, safety, comfort, luxury, power, and handling. I can't imagine a vehicle that would be more pleasing to own and drive than the TSX.
Old 11-07-2003, 03:32 AM
  #51  
Inspired
 
kenbiddulph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by dnl2ba
Isn't the RL the Legend? Both it and the TL have V6s. Aren't both available outside of NA?
The RL and Legend are the same.

The 2nd generation TL was available in Japan as the Inspire, as was the 1st generation.

The 3rd generation TL (2004) is available (so far) in the US and Canada.

Japan still has the Honda Inspire, but it is now a US Accord with a 250 hp 3.0 V6 with Cylinder deactivation.

To my knowledge, Europe can only get two V6 Honda cars, the NSX and the Legend.
Old 11-07-2003, 09:29 AM
  #52  
Instructor
 
Spud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Age: 54
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Overall I'm very satisfied with the TSX as is. Not to say I won't be pissed if they bring out a 2005 model with 15-20% more hp and torque.

But were I after straightline power instead of an overall well-balanced package, I'd have gone with the Accord V6
Old 11-07-2003, 11:07 AM
  #53  
Suzuka Master
 
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Age: 43
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by XPLORx4
....Example: Name your "perfect" car. (It must already exist!) I bet one or more others could point out deficiencies in it, making it not quite so "perfect" anymore.....
Porsche 911 Turbo. Deficient?
Old 11-07-2003, 12:15 PM
  #54  
My other "car" is a 4x4
 
XPLORx4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Age: 55
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by ClutchPerformer
Porsche 911 Turbo. Deficient?
Too expensive. Insufficient passenger capacity. Gotcha.

But the real question is: are the steering wheel controls lit?
Old 11-07-2003, 12:19 PM
  #55  
fdl
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 49
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
BMW m3 or m5. The only thing wrong with these cars is the price
Old 11-07-2003, 01:14 PM
  #56  
Moderator Alumnus
 
sauceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally posted by fdl
BMW m3 or m5. The only thing wrong with these cars is the price
And even then, they have a reputation of being among the best power/price ratio sports/GT cars.
Old 11-07-2003, 01:15 PM
  #57  
Audi Driving Snob
 
TinkySD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For some reason i've always wanted an m5 much more than an m3. I'd also be happy with an e55
Old 11-07-2003, 02:15 PM
  #58  
Suzuka Master
 
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Age: 43
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by TinkySD
For some reason i've always wanted an m5 much more than an m3....
Same here. What the heck happened to the 4-door M3?
Old 11-07-2003, 02:17 PM
  #59  
Suzuka Master
 
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Age: 43
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by XPLORx4
Too expensive. Insufficient passenger capacity. Gotcha.

But the real question is: are the steering wheel controls lit?


What? It has a backseat......technically. :P
Old 11-07-2003, 06:39 PM
  #60  
Not an Ashtray
 
darth62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Stuck in traffic south of Burbank
Age: 62
Posts: 1,818
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by Iceman
What I want is, lighter wheels + better tires. That way I get a faster car AND better handling.
Could I possibly agree more?
Old 11-07-2003, 09:24 PM
  #61  
Racer
 
dnl2ba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by kenbiddulph
The RL and Legend are the same.

The 2nd generation TL was available in Japan as the Inspire, as was the 1st generation.

The 3rd generation TL (2004) is available (so far) in the US and Canada.

Japan still has the Honda Inspire, but it is now a US Accord with a 250 hp 3.0 V6 with Cylinder deactivation.

To my knowledge, Europe can only get two V6 Honda cars, the NSX and the Legend.
Oh crap, the new Inspire is 250 HP with cylinder deactivation? Last I checked, it had the TSX interior too. That's what I want! As the Spanish would say, S O C K S.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MrHeeltoe
1G TSX Tires, Wheels, & Suspension
20
02-23-2023 01:54 PM
iRaw
ILX Photograph Gallery
30
08-05-2016 04:41 PM
knight rider
Car Talk
9
03-04-2016 08:59 AM
MrHeeltoe
2G TSX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
3
09-29-2015 10:43 PM
MrHeeltoe
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
0
09-28-2015 05:43 PM



Quick Reply: Would you sacrifice some handling, for some power?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:03 PM.