Two Door TSX
#3
GEEZER
no.
#4
More On
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Larchmont, NY
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by briny319
Why would there be a two door tsx when the rsx is a two door? Answer, there wouldn't be.
Why would there be a two door tsx when the rsx is a two door? Answer, there wouldn't be.
BTW there's a duplicate thread; maybe they should be merged.
#5
Originally posted by larchmont
Actually, briny, I can see plenty of reason. The TSX is a quite different car, and I can imagine that many potential TSX buyers might prefer a 2-door.
BTW there's a duplicate thread; maybe they should be merged.
Actually, briny, I can see plenty of reason. The TSX is a quite different car, and I can imagine that many potential TSX buyers might prefer a 2-door.
BTW there's a duplicate thread; maybe they should be merged.
#6
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by finalheaven
I really highly doubt that. The back end of the TSX and RSX are already so damn similar. Added to that what are they going to call it? I think if they just redesign the RSX completely to make it a TSX coupe i would understand but otherwise the RSX i think will be the only lower end coupe. Of course the coupe i think people are waiting for is the replacement for CL. I think they are just going to upgrade the RSX as most and not produce a TSX coupe.
I really highly doubt that. The back end of the TSX and RSX are already so damn similar. Added to that what are they going to call it? I think if they just redesign the RSX completely to make it a TSX coupe i would understand but otherwise the RSX i think will be the only lower end coupe. Of course the coupe i think people are waiting for is the replacement for CL. I think they are just going to upgrade the RSX as most and not produce a TSX coupe.
Acura is supposedly bring the TL upmarket a little to compete with the 5 series. The replacement for the CL should compete with the 6 series, IMHO.
#7
More On
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Larchmont, NY
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by finalheaven
I really highly doubt that. The back end of the TSX and RSX are already so damn similar. Added to that what are they going to call it? I think if they just redesign the RSX completely to make it a TSX coupe i would understand but otherwise the RSX i think will be the only lower end coupe. Of course the coupe i think people are waiting for is the replacement for CL. I think they are just going to upgrade the RSX as most and not produce a TSX coupe.
I really highly doubt that. The back end of the TSX and RSX are already so damn similar. Added to that what are they going to call it? I think if they just redesign the RSX completely to make it a TSX coupe i would understand but otherwise the RSX i think will be the only lower end coupe. Of course the coupe i think people are waiting for is the replacement for CL. I think they are just going to upgrade the RSX as most and not produce a TSX coupe.
TSX is much more luxurious, roomier, much more comfortable seats (many many TSX'ers said they just couldn't stand the seats in the RSX), more comfortable ride.
RSX is more of a driver's car, with better performance.
The cars are just very different. I don't see how it can be said that the existence of the RSX takes care of any would-be TSX'ers who want a 2-door. Very few of those people would just get an RSX; they'd go completely elsewhere.
Probably the Accord coupe -- which is maybe why Honda/Acura isn't too worried about it.
Trending Topics
#8
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by briny319
Why would there be a two door tsx when the rsx is a two door? Answer, there wouldn't be.
Why would there be a two door tsx when the rsx is a two door? Answer, there wouldn't be.
I would love a 2-door TSX, but I haven't heard or seen any evidence of one being developed.
It would be _logical_ (or relatively easy) for Honda/Acura to bring their JDM/Euro Accord wagon here as a TSX wagon. I don't know what kind of market demand there would be for a TSX wagon. On the other hand, a number of manufacturers have been introducing new wagons lately. The field is getting more and more crowded. I'm not a wagon fan, but the concept and market for them has always been there under different marketing GUISES, such as the SUV, XUV, and now the Cross-Over.
I can't see Honda/Acura leaving the 2-door entry-level luxury market empty, but they did discontinue the CL...perhaps to make room for a 2-door TSX????
#9
Originally posted by larchmont
TSX is much more luxurious, roomier, much more comfortable seats (many many TSX'ers said they just couldn't stand the seats in the RSX), more comfortable ride.
RSX is more of a driver's car, with better performance.
The cars are just very different. I don't see how it can be said that the existence of the RSX takes care of any would-be TSX'ers who want a 2-door. Very few of those people would just get an RSX; they'd go completely elsewhere.
Probably the Accord coupe -- which is maybe why Honda/Acura isn't too worried about it.
TSX is much more luxurious, roomier, much more comfortable seats (many many TSX'ers said they just couldn't stand the seats in the RSX), more comfortable ride.
RSX is more of a driver's car, with better performance.
The cars are just very different. I don't see how it can be said that the existence of the RSX takes care of any would-be TSX'ers who want a 2-door. Very few of those people would just get an RSX; they'd go completely elsewhere.
Probably the Accord coupe -- which is maybe why Honda/Acura isn't too worried about it.
#10
More On
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Larchmont, NY
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by finalheaven
......That is true that i would not want to get RSX, however i do not want any 2 doors......
......That is true that i would not want to get RSX, however i do not want any 2 doors......
There used to be a feeling that 2-doors are more dangerous to you in an accident -- that they're less solid and you're more likely to get hurt bad.
Is there anything to this? If not, maybe did it used to be true?
#11
Originally posted by larchmont
There used to be a feeling that 2-doors are more dangerous to you in an accident -- that they're less solid and you're more likely to get hurt bad.
Is there anything to this? If not, maybe did it used to be true?
There used to be a feeling that 2-doors are more dangerous to you in an accident -- that they're less solid and you're more likely to get hurt bad.
Is there anything to this? If not, maybe did it used to be true?
2 door convertibles and hardtops (of which there are very few left on the market) *used* to be more dangerous because, lacking B pillars, they were offered less protection in rollover accidents. Which is why in the mid 70's Detroit stopped making both due to the threat of lawsuits.
Most modern 2-doors are coupes with robust b and c pillars and offer at least as much rollover protection as any comparable car with four doors.
Of course, with modern finite-element analysis design tools, there is no reason why even hardtops can't be as safe as cars with thick B pillars. Indeed, MB thinks so, as witnessed by the current CLK series.
#12
More On
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Larchmont, NY
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by fjtorres
Contemporary 2 doors are not per se more dangerous.
2 door convertibles and hardtops (of which there are very few left on the market) *used* to be more dangerous because, lacking B pillars, they were offered less protection in rollover accidents. Which is why in the mid 70's Detroit stopped making both due to the threat of lawsuits.
Most modern 2-doors are coupes with robust b and c pillars and offer at least as much rollover protection as any comparable car with four doors.
Of course, with modern finite-element analysis design tools, there is no reason why even hardtops can't be as safe as cars with thick B pillars. Indeed, MB thinks so, as witnessed by the current CLK series.
Contemporary 2 doors are not per se more dangerous.
2 door convertibles and hardtops (of which there are very few left on the market) *used* to be more dangerous because, lacking B pillars, they were offered less protection in rollover accidents. Which is why in the mid 70's Detroit stopped making both due to the threat of lawsuits.
Most modern 2-doors are coupes with robust b and c pillars and offer at least as much rollover protection as any comparable car with four doors.
Of course, with modern finite-element analysis design tools, there is no reason why even hardtops can't be as safe as cars with thick B pillars. Indeed, MB thinks so, as witnessed by the current CLK series.
P.S. Does this site kick ass or what?
#15
More On
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Larchmont, NY
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by moreace
I think Larchmont talked about the 2-door TSX coming out.....
I think Larchmont talked about the 2-door TSX coming out.....
From all I can tell (i.e. from what I've seen on our boards), there won't be one, at least not any time soon.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Eggs999bacon
2G TSX (2009-2014)
10
09-24-2015 10:08 AM