Tire inflation and handling characteristics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2004, 06:36 PM
  #1  
Not an Ashtray
Thread Starter
 
darth62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Stuck in traffic south of Burbank
Age: 62
Posts: 1,818
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Tire inflation and handling characteristics

From what I can gather from reading this board, most of us inflate our tires a bit more than Acura recommends. I've personally been using 36 F/34 R. But, on whole, it sounds like most of us are also following Acura's recommendation of more PSI up front than in the rear. I suppose this reflects the reality that the rear wheels are mostly along for the ride in a FWD car.

I wondered what would happen if we changed the balance? From what I've read (and, I understand that I could be completely wrong), more rear wheel inflation should lead to less understeer, right? I have been wondering whether it might make sense then to change the balance - most pressure in the back, less up front.

And, yeah, I know increasing the pressure degrades ride quality. I've always though the ride on the TSX was far to stiff, but I really coulnd't care less. So, if I do something that improves handling but detracts from the ride, I'll be happy.

Thoughts?

Moderator: I did not put this thread in the "Tires and Wheels" forum because I hope we can have more of a general discussion about handling.
Old 11-23-2004, 06:54 PM
  #2  
Instructor
 
SacQuacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about the way your car handles are you trying to correct? ...If you are concerned about understeer, I'm afraid that is the nature of a FWD car. It has to do with 1) the balance of weight and 2) factory suspension set up.
The TSX is a great handling car. Frankly, I'd leave it alone unless you are planning to autocross it. A bit of understeer is considered safer than oversteer in "normal" everyday driving.
I's guess that increasing rear tire pressure could lead to oversteer if the pressure is sufficient to decrease rolling resistance or the contact patch of the tires. I'll defer on that matter to the engineers and racers of the group.
Old 11-23-2004, 07:11 PM
  #3  
Not an Ashtray
Thread Starter
 
darth62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Stuck in traffic south of Burbank
Age: 62
Posts: 1,818
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm not trying to "correct" anything. I'm trying to "improve" and also trying to learn about my car.

I'd agree that understeer is a FWD issue, in general, although I find that to be less of an issue with the TSX than any FWD car I've ever driven.
Old 11-23-2004, 07:56 PM
  #4  
Bye TSX, hello domestic?
 
xizor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NOVA
Age: 42
Posts: 8,552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by darth62
I wondered what would happen if we changed the balance? From what I've read (and, I understand that I could be completely wrong), more rear wheel inflation should lead to less understeer, right? I have been wondering whether it might make sense then to change the balance - most pressure in the back, less up front..
I've been trying out different pressures on my stock, and Kumho tires whenever I autocross, including changing pressure between runs. personally i've found that changing PSI between front and back doesn't make a whole lot difference IMO.

Logic would say to over inflate the rear tires so they have a smaller contact patch and therefore break easier preventing understeer... but I didn't find that this really made a difference. I tried higher PSI in the front and the oversteer/understeer was similar. It doesn't necessarily make sense, but vwong (a good autocrosser) said he preferred high in the front, so who knows

high PSI overall does increase handling however as it stiffens the sidewalls, but IMO and testing so far the difference between front/back doesn't change much.
Old 11-23-2004, 08:02 PM
  #5  
Not an Ashtray
Thread Starter
 
darth62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Stuck in traffic south of Burbank
Age: 62
Posts: 1,818
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Thanks for the input Xizor. Knowing this board, it was a sure bet that somebody had tried this out and examined it carefully!

BTW: If inflating a tire reduces the contact patch, was does my TSX seem to handle better with the overinflated tires? I never let the front drop below 36 PSI, but the car handles great.
Old 11-24-2004, 07:32 AM
  #6  
Racer
 
Jim Holloman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North Carolina
Age: 80
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by darth62
BTW: If inflating a tire reduces the contact patch, was does my TSX seem to handle better with the overinflated tires? I never let the front drop below 36 PSI, but the car handles great.
Because of the stiffer sidewalls. The difference made by an increase in air pressure will generally be more noticeable on high-profile tires than on low-profile tires. I suspect that the Acura recommendation of different air pressure for front and rear (32/30) has more to do with weight distribution than with understeer/oversteer.

If I nearly always had two adults in the back seat, I would probably carry 35 PSI in all four tires during the summer and 32 PSI during the winter (lower pressure for more surface contact -- and hopefully grip). I am currently running 34/32 (front/rear) in the tires.

It is astonishing how many vehicles I see with under inflated tires. I lot of people do not realize how dangerous under inflated tires can be.
Old 11-24-2004, 08:30 AM
  #7  
Troutslap Mod-DUH-rator
 
dzuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 8,018
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well to be honest with you, i think that you should always run the recommended tire pressure. i mean, honda engineers spend some time figuring out WHAT to recommend.

plus on top of that, you know that tires have a maximum pressure rating right? i think mine are rated at 41 or 42 psi. just keep that in mind, just b/c you are running 36, air expands when it gets hot, so if you keep your tires too high, they will pop.
Old 11-24-2004, 08:32 AM
  #8  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Along the same lines as dzuy's post, you should also be careful about underinflating your tires too much. This can cause them to cup in the middle, reducing your contact patch and causing uneven wear. All things to keep in mind when you're fiddling with the tire pressures.

Of course, a couple of PSI in either direction from the recommended tire pressure won't likely be too bad.
Old 11-24-2004, 08:56 AM
  #9  
ric
Safety Car
 
ric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
Age: 75
Posts: 4,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SacQuacker
What about the way your car handles are you trying to correct? ...If you are concerned about understeer, I'm afraid that is the nature of a FWD car. It has to do with 1) the balance of weight and 2) factory suspension set up.
The TSX is a great handling car. Frankly, I'd leave it alone unless you are planning to autocross it. A bit of understeer is considered safer than oversteer in "normal" everyday driving.
I's guess that increasing rear tire pressure could lead to oversteer if the pressure is sufficient to decrease rolling resistance or the contact patch of the tires. I'll defer on that matter to the engineers and racers of the group.
I think the combination of the design of the suspension and the vsa are designed to modify as much of the inherent understeer that front wheel drive cars have. When I first shifted from my last (front wheel drive) car, I had to reshape my driving skills just a bit, as the TSX was not nearly as devoted to understeer. I tried to find the review that spoke to the technics, and noted that Acura had modded the suspension of the TSX to compensate for inherent front drive issues as much as possible, but couldn't find it which pisses me off because it was a critical article in my leaning towards the TSX.
Old 11-24-2004, 09:05 AM
  #10  
Instructor
 
SacQuacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ric
I think the combination of the design of the suspension and the vsa are designed to modify as much of the inherent understeer that front wheel drive cars have. When I first shifted from my last (front wheel drive) car, I had to reshape my driving skills just a bit, as the TSX was not nearly as devoted to understeer. I tried to find the review that spoke to the technics, and noted that Acura had modded the suspension of the TSX to compensate for inherent front drive issues as much as possible, but couldn't find it which pisses me off because it was a critical article in my leaning towards the TSX.
I agree the Acura engineers have done an incredible job.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
peti1212
ILX
22
01-05-2022 05:14 PM
JarrettLauderdale
2G CL Dynograph Gallery
5
09-21-2015 07:51 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
4
09-15-2015 06:44 PM
fallacy
2G TSX (2009-2014)
10
09-04-2015 10:15 AM
holografique
3G RLX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
4
09-01-2015 07:54 PM



Quick Reply: Tire inflation and handling characteristics



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:10 PM.