200HP Civic, What Does it Mean for the TSX?
#42
Originally Posted by scheißterhöffer
![rofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
But even then, Honda has a turbo car in its JD market. There's a car called "That's" and it comes with an optional turbo from the factory.
#44
What does it mean for the TSX?
I means we'll see a lot of new riced-out Civics zipping by us while we kick back and relax in our beautiful, comfortable, capable TSXs. *shrug*
Different car, different market.
I means we'll see a lot of new riced-out Civics zipping by us while we kick back and relax in our beautiful, comfortable, capable TSXs. *shrug*
Different car, different market.
#45
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Island,New York
Age: 38
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah sorry I dont See a Horsepower boost because of the new civic..we allready have more then the Accord 4 banger...w/ the same engine...so honda prob figures thats fine...trust me no one would like to have an extra 40 Horses more then me...But I just dont see it in the cards right now...
#46
Advanced
Join Date: May 2004
Location: 503 Oregon
Age: 45
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
40 more hP is useless IMO unless they boose the Torque. Sure, 40 more HP is probably very possible by pushing redline, but I would rather see a 20ft/lb boost in torque.
just my opinion of course.
![Wish](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wish.gif)
#47
White and Nerdy
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cranberry, PA
Age: 53
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just got back from getting the oil changed on my CR-V, and I was checking out the showroom Accords and it got me thinking of this post. It would seem to me that real issue that the 200 HP Civic will bring is that Honda needs to bump up the HP for the 4 cylinder 165 HP Accords.
The sticker on the 4 cyl Accord at my dealer was a little over 25,000. If I were a buyer, I would either go with a 200HP Civic, which I assume would cost less (but that could just be an assumption until we know what the price is going to be) or spend very little more for a TSX. Either way, the 4 cyl Accord is going to be in trouble, although I would expect Honda is going to up the HP on the Accord 4 cyl as well.
Speaking of HP increases, I think the CR-V is due for a bit of a boost as well.
The sticker on the 4 cyl Accord at my dealer was a little over 25,000. If I were a buyer, I would either go with a 200HP Civic, which I assume would cost less (but that could just be an assumption until we know what the price is going to be) or spend very little more for a TSX. Either way, the 4 cyl Accord is going to be in trouble, although I would expect Honda is going to up the HP on the Accord 4 cyl as well.
Speaking of HP increases, I think the CR-V is due for a bit of a boost as well.
#48
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by Godwhacker
Just got back from getting the oil changed on my CR-V, and I was checking out the showroom Accords and it got me thinking of this post. It would seem to me that real issue that the 200 HP Civic will bring is that Honda needs to bump up the HP for the 4 cylinder 165 HP Accords.
The sticker on the 4 cyl Accord at my dealer was a little over 25,000. If I were a buyer, I would either go with a 200HP Civic, which I assume would cost less (but that could just be an assumption until we know what the price is going to be) or spend very little more for a TSX. Either way, the 4 cyl Accord is going to be in trouble, although I would expect Honda is going to up the HP on the Accord 4 cyl as well.
Speaking of HP increases, I think the CR-V is due for a bit of a boost as well.
The sticker on the 4 cyl Accord at my dealer was a little over 25,000. If I were a buyer, I would either go with a 200HP Civic, which I assume would cost less (but that could just be an assumption until we know what the price is going to be) or spend very little more for a TSX. Either way, the 4 cyl Accord is going to be in trouble, although I would expect Honda is going to up the HP on the Accord 4 cyl as well.
Speaking of HP increases, I think the CR-V is due for a bit of a boost as well.
And the CR-V is rumored to be receiving the V6 as an engine choice in its upcoming revision.
#49
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Godwhacker
Just got back from getting the oil changed on my CR-V, and I was checking out the showroom Accords and it got me thinking of this post. It would seem to me that real issue that the 200 HP Civic will bring is that Honda needs to bump up the HP for the 4 cylinder 165 HP Accords.
The sticker on the 4 cyl Accord at my dealer was a little over 25,000. If I were a buyer, I would either go with a 200HP Civic, which I assume would cost less (but that could just be an assumption until we know what the price is going to be) or spend very little more for a TSX. Either way, the 4 cyl Accord is going to be in trouble, although I would expect Honda is going to up the HP on the Accord 4 cyl as well.
Speaking of HP increases, I think the CR-V is due for a bit of a boost as well.
The sticker on the 4 cyl Accord at my dealer was a little over 25,000. If I were a buyer, I would either go with a 200HP Civic, which I assume would cost less (but that could just be an assumption until we know what the price is going to be) or spend very little more for a TSX. Either way, the 4 cyl Accord is going to be in trouble, although I would expect Honda is going to up the HP on the Accord 4 cyl as well.
Speaking of HP increases, I think the CR-V is due for a bit of a boost as well.
The 4 cylinder Accord is actaully 160HP but thats not important. Remember, that 200HP will only be available in a Civic COUPE not the sedan or at least not initially. Nobody will be cross shopping a Civic Coupe wilh a Accord Sedan.
#51
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
And the CR-V is rumored to be receiving the V6 as an engine choice in its upcoming revision.
#52
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by phile
OT: So then we can safely assume that upcoming RDX will definitely be a V6, as it will share underpinnings with the revised CR-V?
#54
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
I somehow still doubt the V6 will be used in the CRV/RDX. My money is on a high output I4.
#55
Pro
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Henderson, NV
Age: 49
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
The problem is that Toyota has already confirmed an optional 6-cylinder engine for the next gen Rav4 so to stay competitive, Honda should be doing the same.
When you think about it, only Toyota and Honda have been sticking with i4's as of late.
#56
SO it seems like the 200hp Civic will be the Civic Coupe concept that comes with brembos and 18" rims.... That means its something similiar to a tuned Civic like a Civic Type R ...so the regular civic coupe and sedans wont have the 200hp....
#57
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by pcdawg
SO it seems like the 200hp Civic will be the Civic Coupe concept that comes with brembos and 18" rims.... That means its something similiar to a tuned Civic like a Civic Type R ...so the regular civic coupe and sedans wont have the 200hp....
#59
Originally Posted by domn
It better come to play with 160HP standard IMO. The Maz3 starts at 148 and the Corolla a 130. Why just match the competition.
#61
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by phile
Because currently Honda can easily sell the current Civic with just 116hp and 127hp for the LX and EX models. It would be nice to see 160hp standard, but Honda generally is conservative when it comes to their bread and butter volume sellers. I mean the new Accord I-4 is only around 10hp stronger than the last gen Accord.
The current Civic isn't selling well at all. The Corolla outsells it by 10K a month now and considering the Corolla is only available as a Sedan, thats bad news.
#62
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by 03CoupeV6
160HP Civic, 160HP Accord four-cylinder -- is that likely? I would think the Accord four-cylinder would need a boost first.
Good point, hadn't thought of that but I still say 160HP is nessesary. Optional for sure.
#63
Photography Nerd
The 160hp accord is a great little car. Sure it's not going to set any speed records but it's more than adequate for hauling the family around. I don't see a whole lot of competition between civic and accord because people will buy the accord for the size.
#64
Pro
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Henderson, NV
Age: 49
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by domn
The current Civic isn't selling well at all. The Corolla outsells it by 10K a month now and considering the Corolla is only available as a Sedan, thats bad news.
To some degree the Corolla looked better then the Civic before Honda saw fit to change the bumper cover, head lights, and grill. Now the Civic look down right sporty.
Also the Corolla is available in a "sport" package that well adds a little flair to it.
Now I do think that it is awfully narrow and tall looking compaired the the more "hunkered" down look of the Civic.
#65
goldmemberererer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: West Hills, CA
Posts: 1,736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Yes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/yes.gif)
Originally Posted by Precision Crafted
Also the Corolla is available in a "sport" package that well adds a little :ghey: to it.
#66
Originally Posted by domn
The current Civic isn't selling well at all. The Corolla outsells it by 10K a month now and considering the Corolla is only available as a Sedan, thats bad news.
Also, the Corolla is only available as a sedan, but Toyota includes sales of the Matrix into the Corolla numbers. Granted that may only be a small number anyways, but those numbers for the Corolla are not just for the sedans.
http://www.aicautosite.com/editoria/asmr/svsedan.asp
#67
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by phile
It's a different story in the US. In some months the Civic actually outsells the Corolla. But the Corolla outsold the Civic in 2004 by over 20K units (Civic 309,196, Corolla 333,161), so it's not outselling the Civic by 10K each month.
Also, the Corolla is only available as a sedan, but Toyota includes sales of the Matrix into the Corolla numbers. Granted that may only be a small number anyways, but those numbers for the Corolla are not just for the sedans.
http://www.aicautosite.com/editoria/asmr/svsedan.asp
Also, the Corolla is only available as a sedan, but Toyota includes sales of the Matrix into the Corolla numbers. Granted that may only be a small number anyways, but those numbers for the Corolla are not just for the sedans.
http://www.aicautosite.com/editoria/asmr/svsedan.asp
I actually was refferiring to the US. In Canada the Civic handliy outsells the Corolla and has been the best selling car in Canada 6 years running. The 10K a month figure was I think from this past January but your right the gap isn't as big as I suggested.
And the Matrix really helps as well, I bet it accounts for at least 7-8K per month.
#69
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Precision Crafted
Toyota does the same thing with the Camary and Solara.
Only fair since the Accord has a coupe as well. And the Solara is the "Camry" Solara.
#70
Time Attack Race Car
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SND
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Turbo Tsx
Why wait until 2007? Why can't you turbo your TSX now? You will have the option of a better turbo over factory. Any TSX has turbo beside the one in the magazine right now.
![Agree](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/agree.gif)
I'm just looking for a turbo-charged TSX by 2007 when the lease on my current one comes up. Then I'll step into the turbo version...
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
![Agree](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/agree.gif)
I'm just looking for a turbo-charged TSX by 2007 when the lease on my current one comes up. Then I'll step into the turbo version...
![Racing](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/racing.gif)
#71
Photography Nerd
Originally Posted by ix8vii
Why wait until 2007? Why can't you turbo your TSX now? You will have the option of a better turbo over factory. Any TSX has turbo beside the one in the magazine right now.
![No](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/no.gif)
As soon as there is some sort of aftermarket fuel management system that works with our DBW system there will be an endless flood of turbo'd k24's.
#72
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by ix8vii
Why wait until 2007? Why can't you turbo your TSX now? You will have the option of a better turbo over factory. Any TSX has turbo beside the one in the magazine right now.
And plus, I have a lease so it'd be a waste of my money to put a turbo in. I'm just going to enjoy the remainder of my lease and then trade up when the lease comes up.
#73
Time Attack Race Car
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SND
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There's no demand for the fuel management system. Correct me if I'm wrong. TSX does not even have LSD. Tuners are not interested on modifying TSX for now. They're busy and back logged modifying STI and EVO's. But if anyone would start to offer a turbo kit for the TSX I would be subscribing.
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
Right now, ![No](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/no.gif)
As soon as there is some sort of aftermarket fuel management system that works with our DBW system there will be an endless flood of turbo'd k24's.
![No](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/no.gif)
As soon as there is some sort of aftermarket fuel management system that works with our DBW system there will be an endless flood of turbo'd k24's.
#74
Time Attack Race Car
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SND
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you're looking for a turbo TSX obviously you're thinking of 1) speeding on the freeway. 2) tracking 3) drag racing or 4) all of the above. Now if you answer 1 of the 4 why are you concern about factory warranty. I can understand your lease is getting close. You can also uninstall the turbo and back your tsx to stock. Just my .02
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
2 words...factory warranty
And plus, I have a lease so it'd be a waste of my money to put a turbo in. I'm just going to enjoy the remainder of my lease and then trade up when the lease comes up.
And plus, I have a lease so it'd be a waste of my money to put a turbo in. I'm just going to enjoy the remainder of my lease and then trade up when the lease comes up.
#75
Photography Nerd
Originally Posted by ix8vii
There's no demand for the fuel management system. Correct me if I'm wrong. TSX does not even have LSD. Tuners are not interested on modifying TSX for now. They're busy and back logged modifying STI and EVO's. But if anyone would start to offer a turbo kit for the TSX I would be subscribing.
-No the TSX doesn't have an LSD but you can add one.
-Yes tuners like the STI and EVO but there are also tons of tuners for Honda and Acura.
#76
Time Attack Race Car
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SND
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
300 post were not all 100% going to buy. If that 300 post will put a down payment, I bet you it will get done. So I would guess the tuners thinks it does not warrant for the time and money to research. What do you think that needs to get done to have the support from the tuners for a turbo kit TSX? $$$
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
-No demand? Have you seen the 300 post thread on the hondata kpro?
-No the TSX doesn't have an LSD but you can add one.
-Yes tuners like the STI and EVO but there are also tons of tuners for Honda and Acura.
-No the TSX doesn't have an LSD but you can add one.
-Yes tuners like the STI and EVO but there are also tons of tuners for Honda and Acura.
#77
Photography Nerd
Originally Posted by ix8vii
300 post were not all 100% going to buy. If that 300 post will put a down payment, I bet you it will get done. So I would guess the tuners thinks it does not warrant for the time and money to research. What do you think that needs to get done to have the support from the tuners for a turbo kit TSX? $$$
The fact is the K series engines are here to stay and DBW is likely to be a key component in any new car based on them. The DBW system adds a great deal of complexity to a system and it's not something any tuner shop is going to crack over night. Hondata is very well respected for producing a quality product and they won't release something until it's been thoroughly tested.
It's probably still a year away but it will be big once it's available.
#78
Bye TSX, hello domestic?
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NOVA
Age: 42
Posts: 8,552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ix8vii
There's no demand for the fuel management system. Correct me if I'm wrong. TSX does not even have LSD. Tuners are not interested on modifying TSX for now. They're busy and back logged modifying STI and EVO's. But if anyone would start to offer a turbo kit for the TSX I would be subscribing.
![Dunno](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
And I'd say there is good demand and now that the car is in its 2nd MY the user base is growing. What else does Hondata have to do lately other than making the same old K20 ECU and Gaskets, I imagine they should be putting R&D into new frontiers for Honda ECU's
#79
Three Wheelin'
Originally Posted by xizor
Maybe the 2006 Civic Si will use DBW w/ its K24 ![Dunno](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
![Dunno](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
#80
Originally Posted by STL
Do you really think we'll see a 2.4 liter in the Si? I would be very surprised to see that big of an engine. Most people believe it will be some 2.0 liter K variant.