0-60 Automatic times?
07-26-2005, 08:47 AM
#4
Senior Moderator
To my knowledge only once has an AT gone head to head with an MT on a track. Both cars were similararly modded and the MT was about 0.5 sec quicker in the 1/4 mile. 15.7 to 16.2 or so If I recall correctly.
07-27-2005, 11:21 AM
#5
Intermediate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My god...9 seconds??!? That's pretty slow..... Any word on how easy it is to mod the auto TSXes to go faster?
I'm thinking about getting one in a year or so, and while I'm not a speed demon, I was expecting it to be comparable to the V6 I have now ~ 7-8 second range, which is what I'd heard...but I guess that's just for the manual. Hmmm.
I'm thinking about getting one in a year or so, and while I'm not a speed demon, I was expecting it to be comparable to the V6 I have now ~ 7-8 second range, which is what I'd heard...but I guess that's just for the manual. Hmmm.
07-27-2005, 11:27 AM
#6
Senior Moderator
Its not a 9 sec car. Most 1/4 mile time even stock have been 16.1 to 16.4. Those times are not consistent with a 9 sec 0-60. More along the lines of 8 sec. The 9 sec time was done by people who would have gotten 8.x in an MT.
Having said all that, the AT is still pretty slow.
Having said all that, the AT is still pretty slow.
07-27-2005, 11:28 AM
#7
My Garage
Originally Posted by jkp1187
My god...9 seconds??!? That's pretty slow..... Any word on how easy it is to mod the auto TSXes to go faster?
Trending Topics
07-27-2005, 02:35 PM
#9
Rep'n Taxbrain.com
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: N. Cali-forn-i-a
Age: 44
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
There is info and dynos here about the Hondata reflash on an AT, no intake.
http://www.hondata.com/reflash_tsx.html
http://www.hondata.com/reflash_tsx.html
07-28-2005, 10:42 AM
#11
Team Owner
Originally Posted by jkp1187
Yeah, I saw those, but I was wondering if anyone had 1/4 mile times.
jlukja, who it too lazy to search for the link.
07-28-2005, 10:54 AM
#12
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by jkp1187
Yeah, I saw those, but I was wondering if anyone had 1/4 mile times.
Someone ran a 16.1. I Think against dzuy on a track like I mentioned above. He had Injen. Hondata and I'm not sure what else.
Someone else ran a 16.2 or 16.3 bone stock. And he had the slips to prove it.
Its a high 15 sec car at the VERY best and you'll likely need CAI and Hondata to get there.
07-28-2005, 11:02 AM
#15
Troutslap Mod-DUH-rator
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 8,018
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
Someone ran a 16.1. I Think against dzuy on a track like I mentioned above. He had Injen. Hondata and I'm not sure what else.
Someone else ran a 16.2 or 16.3 bone stock. And he had the slips to prove it.
Its a high 15 sec car at the VERY best and you'll likely need CAI and Hondata to get there.
Someone else ran a 16.2 or 16.3 bone stock. And he had the slips to prove it.
Its a high 15 sec car at the VERY best and you'll likely need CAI and Hondata to get there.
my slowest time with a MT was 15.7
my fastest time was 15.57 @ ~91.5 mph
i think triz08 (injen cai, hondata, comptech exhuast)
fastest time was 16.1
he now has header and high flow cat tho.
but no way i'm running my car in this florida heat.
my car has been readin 108-110 outside the last couple of weeks.
07-28-2005, 11:21 AM
#17
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by dzuy
Dude, you have these show quality pics of your car and it looks great. You have to upgrade to complete the package.
I'd just get some nice slotted or cross drilled rotors and paint your calipers. Keep it cheap.
07-28-2005, 11:38 AM
#18
Old fart
Originally Posted by jlukja
I think Clutch Performer and, hmmm, was it TSX R' US, ran the quarter and posted timeslips.
jlukja, who it too lazy to search for the link.
jlukja, who it too lazy to search for the link.
16.9 was my quickest...with no brake torquing
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rockyboy
2G RDX (2013-2018)
171
08-04-2024 10:35 AM