Did you guys read about it in Motortrend?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2006, 11:15 AM
  #1  
I'm a llama :(
Thread Starter
 
Motohip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Washington
Posts: 4,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did you guys read about it in Motortrend?

It's supposed to start at $31k and go up to $37k. They said it handles amazing!
Old 06-02-2006, 02:07 PM
  #2  
Aint Doing Sh*t
 
batman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: GA
Age: 44
Posts: 1,037
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
37K!! That's a little on the high side.
Old 06-02-2006, 02:52 PM
  #3  
Racer
 
sdho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: SSF, CA
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
37K with technology package...I think it's too much for entry level cross-over SUV. I guess it's time to wait for what Toyota does with the new Highlander and 4Runner.
Old 06-02-2006, 03:03 PM
  #4  
'02blAcuRAT!! soooCool!!
 
DudeLuv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orlando, Florida
Age: 59
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What I did like about the RDX is that it will have the SH-AWD from the RL....I expect this will be carried over to the entire model line shortly....to the TL by the release of the all new 2008 model....the RSX will not be made next year but there will be a TSX coup in development.
Old 06-02-2006, 04:54 PM
  #5  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by sdho
37K with technology package...I think it's too much for entry level cross-over SUV. I guess it's time to wait for what Toyota does with the new Highlander and 4Runner.
I don't think so. A similarly equipped BMW X3(without xenon headlamps, without the sophisticated AWD system, without the real leather, without DVD-A, etc.) costs an obscenely expensive $43,675 before taxes.

Also, consider that a 4-cylinder RAV4 4x4 costs $28310 and doesn't come with a lot of the stuff that will be on the base RDX.

I think the RDX is actually really well priced, given its competition. The base model can compete with some of the less costly competition by offering some additional equipment, and the Tech package allows Acura to still undercut the more expensive premium competition. Works for me.
Old 06-02-2006, 05:42 PM
  #6  
3rd Gear
 
featherland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree... $37K is a bit steep to get the navigation system. I drove the CX-7 last night and really liked how it performed. Looks like it will run around $32K with the technology package. Didn't like the interior of the Rav4 at all.

So in my price range I'm debating the CX-7 or a certified used RX-330. I really have promised myself navigation in "my next car".

Darn. I really thought the RDX would "the car" for me.
Old 06-02-2006, 05:43 PM
  #7  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
I don't think so. A similarly equipped BMW X3(without xenon headlamps, without the sophisticated AWD system, without the real leather, without DVD-A, etc.) costs an obscenely expensive $43,675 before taxes.

Also, consider that a 4-cylinder RAV4 4x4 costs $28310 and doesn't come with a lot of the stuff that will be on the base RDX.

I think the RDX is actually really well priced, given its competition. The base model can compete with some of the less costly competition by offering some additional equipment, and the Tech package allows Acura to still undercut the more expensive premium competition. Works for me.

Don't you dare bring logic into this......
Old 06-02-2006, 05:44 PM
  #8  
Smitty's Moral Police
 
unlemming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
This all simply proves that SUVs are overpriced :/
Old 06-02-2006, 08:52 PM
  #9  
She said: it's GINORMOUS!
 
mg7726's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NYC
Age: 46
Posts: 2,913
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by unlemming
This all simply proves that SUVs are overpriced :/
overweight too

i can't wait to test drive the turbo 4-cyl. and awd.
Old 06-02-2006, 09:02 PM
  #10  
Drifting
 
Phrosttz0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Upstate, NY
Age: 39
Posts: 2,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a TSX Coupe
Old 06-02-2006, 10:01 PM
  #11  
Three Wheelin'
 
hondamore's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Western Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 1,947
Received 996 Likes on 530 Posts
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
I don't think so. A similarly equipped BMW X3(without xenon headlamps, without the sophisticated AWD system, without the real leather, without DVD-A, etc.) costs an obscenely expensive $43,675 before taxes.

Also, consider that a 4-cylinder RAV4 4x4 costs $28310 and doesn't come with a lot of the stuff that will be on the base RDX.

I think the RDX is actually really well priced, given its competition. The base model can compete with some of the less costly competition by offering some additional equipment, and the Tech package allows Acura to still undercut the more expensive premium competition. Works for me.
Very well said - I agree completely.
Old 06-02-2006, 10:10 PM
  #12  
Three Wheelin'
 
hondamore's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Western Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 1,947
Received 996 Likes on 530 Posts
I will refer all posters bitching about the pricing to the last sentence in Motohip's opening to this thread. Once you drive one you will understand. SH-AWD is NOT just a catchy name. The technology works and it works incredibly well. What price do you place on the smile you will have every time you drive. If sticker price is that much more important to you than driving pleasure, interior fit and finish, technological goodies etc. then by all means buy a CX-7 or a RAV-4 or a CRV, they are all great vehicles and will save you a few bucks.
Old 06-02-2006, 11:34 PM
  #13  
4th Gear
 
Mak Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Age: 55
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is this article on-line yet? Can anyone post a link or cut and paste the article into this thread?

Also, I agree that $37K seems like a fair price for the RDX with the Tech Package, which includes a lot of stuff (nav, rear camera, souped up stereo, hands-free link and more).
Old 06-02-2006, 11:55 PM
  #14  
Advanced
 
busterrobertson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ATL
Age: 37
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well in car and driver they said "in between 30 and 37grand". car and driver had nothing but raves about it. they loved everything about it. and they think it starts at 32...and the tech package on all the acuras cost about 2-3 grand....so that means at most it would be 35$. 37$ is WAY out of the picture....except MAYBE if you add the 19in. wheels. they only chose 37 grand because of the price of x3.
Old 06-05-2006, 09:16 AM
  #15  
Advanced
 
1092's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Age: 64
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Drive out with TTL will = $37K
Old 06-05-2006, 01:30 PM
  #16  
LOVES HIS TL!!!
 
ChuckyD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Age: 43
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I went out and bought the 3 big magazines (R & T, Motortrend and C & D) What i found interesting is that all of the magazines drove it and commented on how it handled and drove overall, but not one of them produced actual numbers to reflect on their opions on straighline performance. ... Strange... All i saw was "MFR EST"...
As a side note, All the reviews were good so far (as they usually are for descent new cars). In my opinion, Motortrend had the best written review.
Old 06-05-2006, 01:41 PM
  #17  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by ChuckyD
I went out and bought the 3 big magazines (R & T, Motortrend and C & D) What i found interesting is that all of the magazines drove it and commented on how it handled and drove overall, but not one of them produced actual numbers to reflect on their opions on straighline performance. ... Strange... All i saw was "MFR EST"...
As a side note, All the reviews were good so far (as they usually are for descent new cars). In my opinion, Motortrend had the best written review.
This is because they were probably invited to participate in an initial media preview, but no instrumented testing was allowed.
Old 06-05-2006, 02:09 PM
  #18  
Burning Brakes
 
Rexorg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,160
Received 19 Likes on 17 Posts
Have not received my copies of MT, or R&T, but have read the C&R article. Looks like a late July availability date is a go. However, the article must have been written a few weeks ago, so who knows for sure?

I talked at length with a Honda salesman last week when we were buying my wife's '06 Civic Coupe EX (super car by the way) and he offered to order a RDX for me, but he had no info either at the time. He told me that the RDX has been in production for a few weeks already and that most are being "tested" by Acura execs, and if there are any defects/problems, production could be slowed or stopped. He also said most will be sold at sticker, but some dealers will be adding ADP (greedy sobs) as there has been a lot of people wanting to pre-order. He thought the RDX base price would be above the TL/Navi and the Tech Package would add about $3K. So, if he knows what he is talking about (remember he is a car salesman after all) the RDX/TP will be about $37K, or thereaouts. I was hoping for $35K. He also said forget about any finance or lease deals for at least a year.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tonio
Car Talk
252
02-05-2019 05:43 PM
OculiAquilae
3G TL (2004-2008)
62
11-19-2018 02:24 PM
1fatcrxnem1
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
22
06-01-2018 01:23 AM
JarrettLauderdale
2G CL Dynograph Gallery
5
09-21-2015 07:51 PM
SilverJ
1/2G MDX (2001-2013)
13
09-21-2015 02:40 PM



Quick Reply: Did you guys read about it in Motortrend?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:10 AM.