Stock Ride Height 2.3 vs 3.0
#1
Intermediate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Age: 41
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stock Ride Height 2.3 vs 3.0
Hi, I am in the market to get a 99 cl. I am not sure what engine to get but the question I have is the ride height. I notice the 2.3 sits higher up than the 3.0 in the rear. Is this just me or does the 2.3 sit higher up than the 3.0? I am guessing they have different springs for the different wieghts of the car. Anyone have a clue? Thanks much
#2
i like orange juice
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Anto, Tejas
Age: 39
Posts: 7,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the 3.0 is a lil heavier so it might sit a lil lower...but i think they are setup diffrent cause the springs are diffrent in aftermarket i think..not 100% sure
#7
-S namyaC-
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: TN
Age: 39
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CLUofI
if they are different it is news to me, maybe one had a full tank the other was empty, that would be 100 pounds difference.
As far as the engine. 3.0 is for stock power or little mods. If you want crazy speed, get the 2.3 5spd, and like was said - swap the motor, turbo, running mice, etc.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1fatcrxnem1
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
22
06-01-2018 01:23 AM
Yumcha
Automotive News
3
09-14-2015 10:48 AM