Gas octane (heh yes again)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-2005, 05:28 PM
  #1  
Suzuka Master
Thread Starter
 
r3mix3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gas octane (heh yes again)

We'll this afternoon Im at a gas station (mobil to be exact) and I'm putting in my 87 like usual. I see another CL pull up next to me also a 97' pretty much stock except clear corners. I was watching him fill up and he put in 93 octane. My friend has a CL and he puts in 93 octane also. He says "It's better for the engine". I say "Your suppose to use 87"...

Now are they getting any benefit at all? Engine run better on 93? I've always used 87 He's like "I only used 87 once or twice when I had to"

Is there anyone who can scan the manual or somewhere where it talks about the octane. I dont have a manual and I want to show my friend.
Old 02-12-2005, 06:45 PM
  #2  
Burn you with a 2.2
 
cantCL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TOronTO
Age: 39
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The manual reads " Use an unleaded gasoline with a pump octane number of 86 or higher. Use of a lower octane gasoline can cause persistent, heavy matallic rapping noise in the engine that can lead to mechanical damage." There basically isn't much benefit from using the 93 instead of 87. In fact, it could actually result in poorer performance, emissions, fuel economy and is just a waste of money from using a higher than recommended octane fuel.
Old 02-12-2005, 07:20 PM
  #3  
Suzuka Master
Thread Starter
 
r3mix3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks. What makes everyone think

93 octane = best for the engine?
Old 02-12-2005, 07:42 PM
  #4  
Intermediate
 
acleco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: toronto
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the manual does say 86 or higher. but i use higher octane because when i first bought the car, the dealer put 87 in and it was really loud, i tried using a higher octane and after getting rid of the old gas, it sounded much better. not sure about the performance though.
Old 02-12-2005, 08:14 PM
  #5  
The movement has started
 
baka_t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hawaii
Age: 44
Posts: 3,645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Using anything above is a waste. My friend a tech at honda advised me to run only 87. When I 1st bought the car, I was running 92, and the gas mileage wasn't great, and the car lagged from time to time. After switching to 87 gas mileage went up, and the car felt less sluggish.
Old 02-12-2005, 09:26 PM
  #6  
Burning Brakes
 
VB87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Age: 37
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So there is NO benefits for us using 93?
Old 02-12-2005, 10:55 PM
  #7  
Flap.
 
Hobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: St. Louis, Mo USA
Age: 38
Posts: 5,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by VB87
So there is NO benefits for us using 93?

no.

octane is a rating of how hard it is to ignite, higher octane prevents detonation, save your money and use the cheap stuff
Old 02-12-2005, 11:17 PM
  #8  
Trailblazer = SUCK
 
LCARUCA 97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Quad Cities IL.
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it all depends on your compression ratio. my f22 ran great on 87 but now i gotta use 93 in the h because of the high compression. which sucks, cause that shit is expensive as hell!
Old 02-12-2005, 11:35 PM
  #9  
Peace, Love & Acura
 
ajtcl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: OK
Age: 54
Posts: 3,284
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Waste of meny, especially these days. Stick to the 87, unless you have changed to a multi-fire ignition module. Then, only on the race course, you might get a benifit from 97. Best to stick to the 87.
Old 02-13-2005, 12:26 PM
  #10  
-S namyaC-
 
proaudio22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: TN
Age: 39
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hobo is right.

Octane is the measure of how much pressure it takes for the fuel to ingnite on it's own. With high compression engines like the CL Type-S, if you use a lower octane fuel, the fuel will literally start to ignite itself before the spark plug even fires (= detonation). The engine (well, computer) will then alter anything it as to compensate (and keep the motor from self destructing), which of course will result in less power. Using high octance in an engine that doesn't need it (like ours) will cause the computer to pull timing so that it will ignite properly - which also will result in a loss of power.

This assumes an engine is good working order. With crappy plugs, whack valves, etc - who knows what it needs to be happy. If your engine is in good working order tho, you should have no reason to use anything other than 87.

High octane engines don't have any extra detergents, cleaners, etc. Gas companies want you to buy it because they make more money. It's about $2-3 difference in price per fill up. Think if they have 100 customers a day, at 10,000 locations, with $2 difference - they made $2M extra that day. Times 365 days is $730 MILLION DOLLARS by having everyone buy the $0.20 more gas. You can see how it would be benificial to them for you to "waste" a couple dollars. There are quite a few more than 10,000 gas stations too, feel free to add a few zeros to that $730M: $7.3 BILLION, $73 BILLION. Oil companies are rich fuckers...
Old 02-13-2005, 12:35 PM
  #11  
Safety Car
 
ghost_masterCL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Somewhere in Denver, CO
Age: 39
Posts: 4,447
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I usually use 87, but I'll toss in some 93 from shell, their V-power shit, to keep the injectors clean, but that's about all I do it for, like once every 4 or 5 fill ups will I do that, all the rest is 87.
Old 02-13-2005, 12:54 PM
  #12  
-S namyaC-
 
proaudio22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: TN
Age: 39
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ghost_masterCL
I usually use 87, but I'll toss in some 93 from shell, their V-power shit, to keep the injectors clean, but that's about all I do it for, like once every 4 or 5 fill ups will I do that, all the rest is 87.
The 93 won't have any extra detergents, they simply advertise them for the high priced fuels, and don't for the others. It gives the appearence that the higher priced one is "better".

If you want to clean the injectors better, switch to Chevron.
Old 02-13-2005, 05:12 PM
  #13  
7th Gear
 
Bullit_Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Canada
Age: 39
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have been using 87 on my CL as well and I can't think of any reason to go higher.

Just out of curitosity, what kind of fuel milage are most getting on their CL's?
Old 02-13-2005, 05:25 PM
  #14  
~ The Endless One ~
 
endlessdragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Age: 47
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my 3.0L cl is crap on mileage...

i get about just over 400 km per tank...i drive 90% city...
Old 02-13-2005, 07:31 PM
  #15  
cl-:P
 
sxsublime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Colts Neck N.J
Age: 37
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
if the type s is supposed to use 93 and the 4 cyl. supposed to use 87, where does the 3.2 cl p fit into all of this?
Old 02-13-2005, 09:45 PM
  #16  
Suzuka Master
Thread Starter
 
r3mix3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
r0dxx's theory would state 89, because its in between. But it's probally 93 also
Old 02-13-2005, 11:46 PM
  #17  
Pro
 
Blenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Calgary, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
400km per tank is pretty damn good for a 3.0, unless they have bigger gas tanks than the 2.2. I'm getting around 500km per tank and mine is a 2.2 with a V2 intake that has seemed to help the milage. I use 87 octane by the way.
Old 02-13-2005, 11:54 PM
  #18  
I'm a llama :(
 
Motohip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Washington
Posts: 4,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My brother who is a technician said that cars that run low octane have a higher build-up of carbon deposits than cars that run higher octane.
Old 02-14-2005, 02:20 PM
  #19  
Suzuka Master
Thread Starter
 
r3mix3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
alright i guess imma start using 93 also? an extra few bucks is worth it for my cars good health.
Old 02-14-2005, 02:23 PM
  #20  
Senior Moderator
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
iTrader: (6)
 
97BlackAckCL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ShitsBurgh
Age: 43
Posts: 92,237
Received 4,477 Likes on 3,070 Posts
I dunno about you guys, but I get a lot better mileage out of a tank of 93. Also, all the myths I hear is it'll burn cleaner, and is better for your engine, never heard much to back it up though. I like arm and a leg 93 though
Old 02-14-2005, 02:54 PM
  #21  
Trailblazer = SUCK
 
LCARUCA 97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Quad Cities IL.
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by r0dxx
alright i guess imma start using 93 also? an extra few bucks is worth it for my cars good health.

dude......did you not read anything we have been talking about? our cars run best on 87. period. dont waste your money on expensive gas. its not there to make your car run better, its there for the cars that require it, i.e. cars with high compression. save your money and stick with the 87. anyone who says they are getting better results out of anything else are just fucking retarded. Its been dyno proven that 87 runs best on the f22 and the j30.
Old 02-14-2005, 08:00 PM
  #22  
2600lb CL
iTrader: (2)
 
Cocoa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: TX
Age: 41
Posts: 9,941
Likes: 0
Received 112 Likes on 83 Posts
I use 100....but only when I run....and for the obvious reasons, lol.......
Old 02-14-2005, 08:01 PM
  #23  
2600lb CL
iTrader: (2)
 
Cocoa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: TX
Age: 41
Posts: 9,941
Likes: 0
Received 112 Likes on 83 Posts
but yes, stick with 87 man...no need for 93.....unless your squeezing or running some other source of forced induction....
Old 02-14-2005, 08:41 PM
  #24  
AWD Torque Monster
 
VXCL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NJ
Age: 42
Posts: 4,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the compression is so LOW in the f22 and f23 cl that it cant burn the extra octane anyways. you get no benefit. my cl ran better and got 32 mpg on the high way easy even having 80k on it and being 8 yrs old. just throw som cleaner in th tank like evry other oil change and use 87. dont wast your money
Old 02-14-2005, 10:24 PM
  #25  
how handsome I am
 
agranado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Age: 39
Posts: 12,983
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I just put 343.3 miles on 15.3 gallons worth of gas. (yes, I record my miles/gas.)

took me 30 bucks to fill the entire tank (1.94!)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
xsilverhawkx
2G TL Problems & Fixes
4
10-05-2015 11:00 AM
Skirmich
2G TL (1999-2003)
4
10-01-2015 12:59 PM
DementiaPhuro
3G TL Problems & Fixes
1
09-29-2015 05:31 PM
San Yasin
2G RDX (2013-2018)
21
09-29-2015 10:52 AM



Quick Reply: Gas octane (heh yes again)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 PM.