Premium Gas Necessary?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-27-2011, 10:04 AM
  #1  
2nd Gear
Thread Starter
 
statboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Premium Gas Necessary?

Premium gas is "required " for my 2009 MDX. What are the consequences of using regular or mid grade?
Old 02-27-2011, 10:48 AM
  #2  
MATT
 
06cmv6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 836
Received 73 Likes on 58 Posts
there is a reason for it..it only amounts to a few dollars at the pump even if you fill up...don't risk effing up your engine components by putting something less than the premium in it
Old 02-27-2011, 11:17 AM
  #3  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,640
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
You'll more than likely lose gas mileage as well, its not worth it.
Old 02-27-2011, 01:24 PM
  #4  
cb4
Cruisin'
 
cb4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Age: 51
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 2011 fuel flap says "required". It doesn't say recommended. The manual should tell you. If it says recommended for your particular year then you should be able to go with non premium but you will likely get less power. If it says required, well it's obvious what you should do.
Old 02-27-2011, 08:48 PM
  #5  
Intermediate
 
moto94536's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: reno nv
Age: 44
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you can get away with 87 or 89. acura required 91. Acura get 300 HP from using octane 91.

If you care about high gas prices, you can use octane 87 or 89 from top tier gas such as chevron, texaco,conoco, 76, mobil, exxon, shell, so on.. it may probably 290 HP at peak RPM.. but who need it?
Old 02-28-2011, 12:11 PM
  #6  
Intermediate
 
M3EP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Age: 58
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I 've never driven on only 87 ,but on a few occasions used 89 and mix of 87/93. Never noticed lack of power nor pour MPG.
Old 02-28-2011, 12:15 PM
  #7  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 31
Posts: 17,431
Received 1,485 Likes on 1,049 Posts
Car will retard timing to avoid knock, which might happen anyways, you'll see a reduction in fuel economy and power, and your car will just run worse all around. To top it all off, you won't actually be saving a noticeable amount of money.
Old 03-02-2011, 05:59 PM
  #8  
My Work is Done Here
 
ccannizz11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Still too far from the beach
Posts: 11,134
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
The short answer is, no. But every car is different, even within the same make and model, and it may change over time with your car. Typically, the older it gets, the less efficient it will be on lower grade fuel (assuming premium is recommended). I do this experiment on every non-high performance car I buy. I have never found a car (mine or anyone else's) pre-2003 MY that would be cost effective to drive on lower octane fuel. After 2003, it is still rare, as far as I can tell.


Here's my stats for our 2005 MDX:

Date Range: June 2, 2010 through August 18, 2010
Average daytime high temp: 94 degrees F
Conditions: Day and night; 60% highway 40% city streets, with one long trip on each type of fuel (almost one full tank used without stopping)
Fuel tested: 91 Octane and 89 Octane, purchased at various QuikTrips (guaranteed gasoline! may contain up to 10% ethanol )
Each type of fuel tested for 3 full tanks, with one tank of each fuel type used prior to beginning measurements.


Numbers:

91 Octane
Average price/gallon: $2.93*
Total cost of 3 tanks: 1-18.374 gallons ($53.65) 2-18.889 gallons ($55.35) 3-18.995 gallons ($55.85) = $164.85**
Total Miles: 1085.8
Avg MPG: 19.3
Avg cost per mile driven: $0.15182
Total cost extrapolated over 1 year: $1,743.50***


89 Octane
Average price/gallon: $2.83*
Total cost of 3 tanks: 1-18.448 gallons ($52.21) 2-18.987 gallons ($53.73) 3-19.112 gallons ($54.09) = $160.03**
Total Miles: 1051.8
Avg MPG: 18.6
Avg cost per mile driven: $0.15215
Total cost extrapolated over 1 year: $1,747.29***


Conclusion:

The difference in how far my dollar gets me on 89 Octane versus 91 Octane is statistically insignificant. Putting 89 Octane in the MDX serves no purpose other than to make me feel better at the time of fill-up.


*These prices are based on the number displayed on the pump at time of fill-up, added together and divided by 3. It is not based on the total cost and the total gallons purchased at each fill-up. This is for informational purposes. I don't care what my total average cost per gallon is, I only care how far my money lets me go.

**This is why people want to try 89 Octane.

***Using 11,484 miles driven from February 2010 to February 2011.
Old 03-03-2011, 12:12 AM
  #9  
Burning Brakes
 
ichi d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 965
Received 76 Likes on 64 Posts
if you are thinking about putting 87 in your mdx i think its time for you to trade in and get a CRV.
Old 03-03-2011, 10:00 AM
  #10  
Rich and Famous
 
EL_PIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by M3EP
I 've never driven on only 87 ,but on a few occasions used 89 and mix of 87/93. Never noticed lack of power nor pour {poor} MPG.
Acura says 91 octane but also Prem required on fuel cover.
Note that ethanol will decrease octane and foul up your intake.
Its very easy to mix if you fillup with tank half empty.
One time use Plus and the next use Prem.
Here in Austin Plus is posted as 89 and Prem as 93 - reg is 86.

Originally Posted by ccannizz11
The short answer is, no. But every car is different, even within the same make and model, and it may change over time with your car. Typically, the older it gets, the less efficient it will be on lower grade fuel (assuming premium is recommended). I do this experiment on every non-high performance car I buy. I have never found a car (mine or anyone else's) pre-2003 MY that would be cost effective to drive on lower octane fuel. After 2003, it is still rare, as far as I can tell.


Here's my stats for our 2005 MDX:

Date Range: June 2, 2010 through August 18, 2010
Average daytime high temp: 94 degrees F
Conditions: Day and night; 60% highway 40% city streets, with one long trip on each type of fuel (almost one full tank used without stopping)
Fuel tested: 91 Octane and 89 Octane, purchased at various QuikTrips (guaranteed gasoline! may contain up to 10% ethanol )
Each type of fuel tested for 3 full tanks, with one tank of each fuel type used prior to beginning measurements.


Numbers:

91 Octane
Average price/gallon: $2.93*
Total cost of 3 tanks: 1-18.374 gallons ($53.65) 2-18.889 gallons ($55.35) 3-18.995 gallons ($55.85) = $164.85**
Total Miles: 1085.8
Avg MPG: 19.3
Avg cost per mile driven: $0.15182
Total cost extrapolated over 1 year: $1,743.50***


89 Octane
Average price/gallon: $2.83*
Total cost of 3 tanks: 1-18.448 gallons ($52.21) 2-18.987 gallons ($53.73) 3-19.112 gallons ($54.09) = $160.03**
Total Miles: 1051.8
Avg MPG: 18.6
Avg cost per mile driven: $0.15215
Total cost extrapolated over 1 year: $1,747.29***


Conclusion:

The difference in how far my dollar gets me on 89 Octane versus 91 Octane is statistically insignificant. Putting 89 Octane in the MDX serves no purpose other than to make me feel better at the time of fill-up.


*These prices are based on the number displayed on the pump at time of fill-up, added together and divided by 3. It is not based on the total cost and the total gallons purchased at each fill-up. This is for informational purposes. I don't care what my total average cost per gallon is, I only care how far my money lets me go.

**This is why people want to try 89 Octane.

***Using 11,484 miles driven from February 2010 to February 2011.
I think this is valid logic.

Note - the octane posted on pump is overstated !!!
Ethanol and methanol {if any state still uses it after they figured out it is cancer causing} decreases the octane.

Does anyone know how much octane is decreased with 10 or 15 % ethanol mixed in ???

Last edited by EL_PIC; 03-03-2011 at 10:08 AM.
Old 03-03-2011, 10:10 AM
  #11  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 31
Posts: 17,431
Received 1,485 Likes on 1,049 Posts
Ethanol decreases octane?

Say wha?

Pretty sure ethanol is an octane booster. Or are you saying that the octane of pure gas in E10 or E15 is lower than it is in E0, since ethanol's higher octane makes up for it?
Old 03-03-2011, 11:48 AM
  #12  
Rich and Famous
 
EL_PIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by Aman
Ethanol decreases octane?

Say wha?

Pretty sure ethanol is an octane booster. Or are you saying that the octane of pure gas in E10 or E15 is lower than it is in E0, since ethanol's higher octane makes up for it?
Simple True but wrong logic.
Pure Ethanol is like 110 + but ...
there are many various types with differ numbers used in gas mixtures and when mixed with pure gas often causes a decrease in overall octane.
This is due to compatability, water, and phase content effects.
http://www.fuel-testers.com/gasoline...hanol_E10.html

Would like to hear comments from a real Chemical Engineering Dude ...
Old 03-03-2011, 11:51 AM
  #13  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 31
Posts: 17,431
Received 1,485 Likes on 1,049 Posts
Thanks for the link.
Old 03-07-2011, 08:57 PM
  #14  
3rd Gear
 
Double_R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My mom has had an X5, ML500, and a GL550 and she has never used premium in them and has also never had any problems, so who knows... I put prem in my MDX
Old 03-11-2011, 07:12 PM
  #15  
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (2)
 
RACINGHART03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SOMEWHERE IN NJ
Age: 49
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 7 Posts
I currently have a customer in with a 2008 MDX who has been using regular and I mean JUNK regular, and has burnt a valve. Please people, The engine was designed to run on Premium unleaded. It matters! If you dont want to put the correct gas in the vehicle, be prepared for the potential consequences.
Old 03-11-2011, 08:51 PM
  #16  
Intermediate
 
moto94536's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: reno nv
Age: 44
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think he will burn a valve even if he use No-Name brand ( preminum). The key is to use top-tier gas. In my opinion, acura can use octane 87 from chevron,texaco,shell, conoco,76,mobil .
Old 03-12-2011, 08:23 AM
  #17  
Rich and Famous
 
EL_PIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 24 Posts
The truth is ...
you don't really what you pump in regardless of what advertised.
Gas additives are like what individual tobacco companies add to cigs.
The main gas players "also cleaverly marketed" as top teir might be more consistent but the addition of ethanol/other is an open variable.
Ethanol's downfall is water and it soaks it up rapidly from ground
and air {more problems with the wet high R/H areas}.
Water in your gas decreases HP, MPG, and increases corrison.
Learn from Brazil's cheap high sugar cane ethanol % and how it eats engines and gives poor MPG, HP.
I have been working with Shell Plus 89 and Shell Prem 93 at 50/50 mixes and it seems good.
But only $3.00 difference between plus and prem and a 20 gal tank.
When US ups ethanol from 10 to 15 %+... I will then use all 93 prem.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
xsilverhawkx
2G TL Problems & Fixes
4
10-05-2015 11:00 AM
MilanoRedDashR
3G TL Problems & Fixes
2
10-02-2015 10:49 AM
Skirmich
2G TL (1999-2003)
4
10-01-2015 12:59 PM
San Yasin
2G RDX (2013-2018)
21
09-29-2015 10:52 AM



Quick Reply: Premium Gas Necessary?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:48 AM.