Ingalls or SPC rear camber kit ?

Old 11-03-2012, 02:23 PM
  #41  
Racer
 
DeMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SE. TX
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Actual rear
(left)-1.4 degree camber (Right) -1.8d*
(left)-0.02 degree toe (Right)-0.01d

before

(left)-1.4 degree (Right) -1.8d*

(left)0.05 degree (Right) -0.32d*

spec range

(left)-1.5 degree -0.5d camber (Right) -1.5d -0.5d
(left)-0.08d 0.08d Toe (Right) -0.08d 0.08d




Total toe actual -0.03d before 0.26d * SR -.16D 0.16D
Thrust Angle actual -0.01d before 0.18d


Hopefully this can be understood. Had trouble with uploading sheet.

Front end is or was within specs after alignment.

Last edited by DeMAN; 11-03-2012 at 02:29 PM.
Old 11-07-2012, 07:27 PM
  #42  
Racer
 
DeMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SE. TX
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by DeMAN
Actual rear
(left)-1.4 degree camber (Right) -1.8d*
(left)-0.02 degree toe (Right)-0.01d

before

(left)-1.4 degree (Right) -1.8d*

(left)0.05 degree (Right) -0.32d*

spec range

(left)-1.5 degree -0.5d camber (Right) -1.5d -0.5d
(left)-0.08d 0.08d Toe (Right) -0.08d 0.08d




Total toe actual -0.03d before 0.26d * SR -.16D 0.16D
Thrust Angle actual -0.01d before 0.18d


Hopefully this can be understood. Had trouble with uploading sheet.

Front end is or was within specs after alignment.
Any comments on these figures
Old 11-08-2012, 01:22 PM
  #43  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Excelerate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: www.ExceleratePerformance.com
Age: 43
Posts: 9,877
Received 624 Likes on 478 Posts
The SPC kit only adjusts camber but it looks like that's all you need. The INGALLS kit includes an arm for camber and toe. Both are linked below and you need a qty of 2 of either:

SPC:

http://store.excelerateperformance.c.../i-397045.aspx

INGALLS:

http://store.excelerateperformance.c...5/i-60220.aspx
Old 11-17-2012, 12:21 PM
  #44  
Racer
 
DeMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SE. TX
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Post Camber kit numbers now listed in navy

Actual rear
(left)-1.4 degree camber (Right) -1.8d* now -0.6 (L & R)
(left)-0.02 degree toe (Right)-0.01d now 0.00 (L) 0.01(R)

before

(left)-1.4 degree (Right) -1.8d*

(left)0.05 degree (Right) -0.32d*

spec range

(left)-1.5 degree -0.5d camber (Right) -1.5d -0.5d
(left)-0.08d 0.08d Toe (Right) -0.08d 0.08d




Total toe actual -0.03d before 0.26d * SR -.16D 0.16D Now 0.01
Thrust Angle actual -0.01d before 0.18d Now 0.00


Thanks for the info. Hopefully this slows the uneven tire wear I had been experiencing over the last few tire changes. Time will tell.

Last edited by DeMAN; 11-17-2012 at 12:24 PM.
Old 11-18-2012, 04:09 PM
  #45  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
MrHeeltoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pac Northwest
Posts: 6,944
Received 509 Likes on 323 Posts
Fingers crossed for you. We do believe the Ingalls is a better rear choice, check them out here on special for a limited time:
https://acurazine.com/forums/heeltoe-automotive-365/camber-kits-group-buy-htspec-skunk2-ingalls-tl-cl-tsx-accord-847421/
Old 01-19-2013, 08:15 PM
  #46  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
MrHeeltoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pac Northwest
Posts: 6,944
Received 509 Likes on 323 Posts
We recently got an email from a customer looking for comment on the Ingalls bushing "donut" issue. First I'd like to say I have no idea what this "donut" phenomenon is. A donut is a cakey excuse to eat dessert for breakfast, or an adjective for the shape of an object if it resembles said breakfast treat. When a bushing is deformed by a side load I'd say it, well, deformed.

We posted higher up why we prefer the Ingalls...mostly because of the ball-joint issue the SPC, CT, Eibach, etc all have. But if this bushing deformation is a concern we can only really say it is something that has never really come back to bite our customers that we know of. In the rare event someone with an Ingalls kit comes back we have always been able to support them in getting replacement parts. It isn't so much a question of "which part is better" because honestly both parts are good for different people (Ingalls are better for correcting camber, and SPC et al are better for fitting wheels that don't fit). The real question is, who is going to support you later when you need help?
Old 04-13-2013, 05:22 PM
  #47  
Instructor
 
vatltltl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 57
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I too just discovered the worn bushings phenomena in my Ingalls rear camber kit. I've had them on for probably 70,000 miles and 5 years with Tein H-Techs.
Old 04-13-2013, 07:14 PM
  #48  
-------Tim-------
 
Slpr04UA6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Tampa, Fl
Age: 45
Posts: 2,541
Received 609 Likes on 513 Posts
^What issues are you experiencing? I only ask because I may be experiencing them as well! If u can please elaborate? Thnks


I have had the rear Ingalls installed for about 2-2 1/2 yrs.
Old 04-14-2013, 07:04 AM
  #49  
Instructor
 
vatltltl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 57
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Slpr04UA6
^What issues are you experiencing? I only ask because I may be experiencing them as well! If u can please elaborate? Thnks


I have had the rear Ingalls installed for about 2-2 1/2 yrs.
I actually wasn't experiencing any issues that I was aware of. I have always done the work on my car, but I had surgery and couldn't rotate my tires so I took it to the shop and they discovered it while on the lift. The rear wheels wobbled and they traced it to the bushings on the camber kit. They were surprised I couldn't feel or hear it while driving and that my fairly new tires weren't chewed up.
Old 04-14-2013, 12:50 PM
  #50  
Pro
iTrader: (1)
 
Lazer187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Age: 42
Posts: 585
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
I have had rear in galls for a few years now and live in Wisconsin and I would just like to say ALL of the nuts on the camber arm are seized tight and can't be broken loose. When I first installed them I caked the threads and nut with anti seize . I say if u have winters these ingals will only last a few seasons
Old 04-14-2013, 06:01 PM
  #51  
2014 Jeep SRT
 
ebelp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 45
Posts: 3,906
Received 1,615 Likes on 1,030 Posts
Originally Posted by Lazer187
I have had rear in galls for a few years now and live in Wisconsin and I would just like to say ALL of the nuts on the camber arm are seized tight and can't be broken loose. When I first installed them I caked the threads and nut with anti seize . I say if u have winters these ingals will only last a few seasons
That's awful news. I may be adjusting my camber soon, and my rear Ingalls kit has been through a couple NY winters, so this might be the case for me too.
Old 04-17-2013, 01:07 PM
  #52  
Pro
iTrader: (1)
 
Lazer187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Age: 42
Posts: 585
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by ebelp
That's awful news. I may be adjusting my camber soon, and my rear Ingalls kit has been through a couple NY winters, so this might be the case for me too.

Sad thing is, I forgot to mention that EVERY fall and Spring since i had these, the camber arms have been adjusted. So basically this happened over one winter. It would be a great idea if Ingall put a plastic washer or something to help protect from the metal on metal corrosion.
Old 04-17-2013, 05:17 PM
  #53  
Burning Brakes
 
4drviper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,138
Received 78 Likes on 61 Posts
Originally Posted by Lazer187
Sad thing is, I forgot to mention that EVERY fall and Spring since i had these, the camber arms have been adjusted. So basically this happened over one winter. It would be a great idea if Ingall put a plastic washer or something to help protect from the metal on metal corrosion.

i want to get some rubber sheets and wrap it around the thread, and zip tie both ends,, would that keep it from "winter elements" causing corrosion?

or is it pure metal to metal corrosion
Old 04-18-2013, 10:57 AM
  #54  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Excelerate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: www.ExceleratePerformance.com
Age: 43
Posts: 9,877
Received 624 Likes on 478 Posts
Originally Posted by Lazer187
I have had rear in galls for a few years now and live in Wisconsin and I would just like to say ALL of the nuts on the camber arm are seized tight and can't be broken loose. When I first installed them I caked the threads and nut with anti seize . I say if u have winters these ingals will only last a few seasons
That isn't an INGALLS issue though; it's an Acura issue. Even the factory bolts get seized. Every car that comes through here for a rear INGALLS camber kit install has seized bolts.
Old 09-19-2013, 06:16 PM
  #55  
2007 TL
 
tj19855's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Name:  TireWear.jpg
Views: 2812
Size:  46.9 KB
Originally Posted by MrHeeltoe
Don't waste your money on a camber kit if that is your problem. Most likely you have a bad alignment (toe is off) and/or your rear shocks are worn causing excess droop and cycling of the suspension (both of which affect toe).
I have this problem at the moment with my stock suspension, shop says the alignment is ok, I'm starting to think is my shocks that are bad. https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...9#post14675349

Last edited by tj19855; 09-19-2013 at 06:19 PM.
Old 05-14-2015, 06:13 PM
  #56  
3rd Gear
 
structuredata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Excelerate
The INGALLS rear kit is a better kit; it gives you toe and camber adjustment for the same price as the Eibach/SPC. By the way, Eibach is just SPC re-branded. We have never had any quality issues on the INGALLS kits and we sell and install a lot of them.

Here is a link to them (you need a qty of 2 if ordering):

Ingalls Alignment Kit - Excelerate Performance - Japanese and European Performance Specialists!!
I have 04 Acura TL with XXR 527 with 18/8/75 with offset 20 running Continental DW 225/40/18, i did approximately 1.5" to 2" drop. My rear camber came out -2.6 from alignment report yesterday, my front camber is 1.6. XLR8 could you recommend front and rear camber for my situation? thanks
Old 05-15-2015, 09:39 AM
  #57  
Former Sponsor
 
ExcelerateRep's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Branford, CT
Posts: 2,228
Received 350 Likes on 287 Posts
If you have -2.6 in the rear you'll want two of these:
Ingalls Alignment Kit - Excelerate Performance - Japanese and European Performance Specialists!!

Two of these will take care of the +1.6 in the front:
Ingalls Alignment Kit - Excelerate Performance - Japanese and European Performance Specialists!!
Old 05-15-2015, 12:34 PM
  #58  
Burning Brakes
 
t-rd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: HERE
Age: 49
Posts: 979
Received 123 Likes on 99 Posts
SPC = yes
Ingalls = NO
Old 05-15-2015, 12:35 PM
  #59  
Race Director
 
nfnsquared's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: MAGA country
Posts: 12,474
Received 1,793 Likes on 1,346 Posts
Originally Posted by ExcelerateRep
You forgot to tell him that the Ingalls kits come without a warranty if installed on a non-stock suspension....

"Use of this product in competition, or use on vehicles altered from original manufacturer's specifications or settings, EXPRESSLY VOIDS WARRANTY. The user is urged to inspect for suspension binding or interference when the product is used in these manners. However, due to the varying conditions and manner of use which the product will be subjected to in such uses, Ingalls Engineering Co., Inc. makes no warranties, either express or implied, including any warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose for use in competition or with specifications or setting other than those specified by the original manufacturer's specifications."

The SPC rear camber arms will handle your rear camber issue with ease...and SPC makes no statement about voiding the warranty on non-stock vehicles....

Last edited by nfnsquared; 05-15-2015 at 12:39 PM.
Old 05-17-2015, 09:26 AM
  #60  
Burning Brakes
 
t-rd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: HERE
Age: 49
Posts: 979
Received 123 Likes on 99 Posts
No offense, but ExcelerateRep needs to stop jumping in to push Ingalls. Have we not put out enough warnings out there?!
Old 06-05-2015, 05:25 PM
  #61  
Instructor
 
3GTLCHICK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: So Cal
Posts: 169
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
I think enough people now know. If some of this could spread to fb pages, the information would travel faster.
Old 06-05-2015, 07:50 PM
  #62  
Instructor
 
Navy TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Browns Summit, NC
Posts: 160
Received 17 Likes on 5 Posts
Before i order the SPC rear camber kit, i just want to make sure that all i need to order is one arm for each tire?
Old 06-06-2015, 05:07 PM
  #63  
-------Tim-------
 
Slpr04UA6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Tampa, Fl
Age: 45
Posts: 2,541
Received 609 Likes on 513 Posts
^yes, one arm per side for the rear.
The following users liked this post:
Navy TL (06-06-2015)
Old 07-06-2015, 02:05 AM
  #64  
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (2)
 
Bruce Banner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,081
Received 81 Likes on 74 Posts
I'm confused by the back and forth as to which solution is really the least problematic.

There is some general consensus form both sides that the SPC will handle the camber and it has been mentioned that buying the ingalls, you can adjust the toe too, but from OEM toe is already adjustable. I'm not following how this is some additional advantage.

The SPC kit only adjusts camber but it looks like that's all you need. The INGALLS kit includes an arm for camber and toe. Both are linked below and you need a qty of 2 of either
Old 07-06-2015, 08:08 PM
  #65  
Intermediate
 
TonyN923's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Arizona
Posts: 32
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I went with SPC and glad I did, seems to hold up better than Ingalls if you use the OEM rubber ball joint cover. Also the Toe has plenty of adjustment, im droped 1.5 and easily zeroed out the toe, no need for Ingalls, especially since they have cheap bushings that fail over time.
Old 07-06-2015, 10:39 PM
  #66  
Race Director
 
nfnsquared's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: MAGA country
Posts: 12,474
Received 1,793 Likes on 1,346 Posts
Originally Posted by TonyN923
I went with SPC and glad I did, seems to hold up better than Ingalls if you use the OEM rubber ball joint cover. Also the Toe has plenty of adjustment, im droped 1.5 and easily zeroed out the toe, no need for Ingalls, especially since they have cheap bushings that fail over time.
The old red boots were cracking. SPC fixed that with the new black "accordion" boots. No need to replace the new boots.
The following 2 users liked this post by nfnsquared:
MonkeyTrucker (09-02-2015), TonyN923 (07-06-2015)
Old 07-06-2015, 10:41 PM
  #67  
Intermediate
 
TonyN923's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Arizona
Posts: 32
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by nfnsquared
The old red boots were cracking. SPC fixed that with the new black "accordion" boots. No need to replace the new boots.
sweet, i was going to replace the boot this weekend, guess i dont need too now. thanks
Old 07-12-2015, 11:35 AM
  #68  
Instructor
 
3GTLCHICK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: So Cal
Posts: 169
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
here is what you can expect with Ingalls kit.

This is the third set of bushings and many $$$$ wasted on tires and alignments. Stay away from this ill engineered kit. Ingalls refuses to admit that there is an issue, even though all better quality aftermarket arms come with oem bushing design to eliminate this issue. I had this researched thoroughly for me by a few suspension experts.

The first kit wore out the fastest, likely because heel toe Marcus guy installed them loaded as It was explained to me. He tightened them while the car was in the air and not once it was at ride height and in proper position. If you look at his earlier replies, he refuses to own up to this, but rather deflects any part of this conversation.

Last edited by 3GTLCHICK; 07-12-2015 at 11:38 AM.
Old 07-12-2015, 12:00 PM
  #69  
Instructor
 
3GTLCHICK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: So Cal
Posts: 169
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
https://acurazine.com/forums/attachm...711_163620.jpg

Here is what end result has looked like since first install.
Old 07-15-2015, 07:54 AM
  #70  
6th Gear
 
UA7NBP_616's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ingalls +1
Old 07-16-2015, 12:07 PM
  #71  
Burning Brakes
 
t-rd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: HERE
Age: 49
Posts: 979
Received 123 Likes on 99 Posts
If you care about your car as a daily driver, DO NOT GET INGALLS ARMS. It will ruin your tires and the rear suspension becomes very soft with unusual compression during cornering. 3 years of real world experience here. I'm not a vendor proposing to sell you anything. If you are at show ride status and drive your car with rear wheels completely and ridiculously slanted with more than -3 degree of camber on stretched out tires then go ahead and try to ruin the tires and ride quality since they are already ruined anyway.

Last edited by t-rd; 07-16-2015 at 12:10 PM.
Old 07-16-2015, 01:57 PM
  #72  
Safety Car
iTrader: (7)
 
thisaznboi88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Jose, CA/ Charleston, WV
Posts: 4,045
Received 619 Likes on 459 Posts
your toe is off since your not running extreme camber. toe eat tires faster than camber. Also I recommended the spc over ingalls
Old 07-16-2015, 04:57 PM
  #73  
Instructor
 
3GTLCHICK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: So Cal
Posts: 169
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
This deserves it's very own thread with pics. I have many. Many still don't get it...lol.
Old 07-16-2015, 05:05 PM
  #74  
Instructor
 
3GTLCHICK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: So Cal
Posts: 169
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by MrHeeltoe
We recently got an email from a customer looking for comment on the Ingalls bushing "donut" issue. First I'd like to say I have no idea what this "donut" phenomenon is. A donut is a cakey excuse to eat dessert for breakfast, or an adjective for the shape of an object if it resembles said breakfast treat. When a bushing is deformed by a side load I'd say it, well, deformed.

We posted higher up why we prefer the Ingalls...mostly because of the ball-joint issue the SPC, CT, Eibach, etc all have. But if this bushing deformation is a concern we can only really say it is something that has never really come back to bite our customers that we know of. In the rare event someone with an Ingalls kit comes back we have always been able to support them in getting replacement parts. It isn't so much a question of "which part is better" because honestly both parts are good for different people (Ingalls are better for correcting camber, and SPC et al are better for fitting wheels that don't fit). The real question is, who is going to support you later when you need help?
Here is your doughnut, sweetheart. We can also call it muffin pie...haha. See link in post 69.

Last edited by 3GTLCHICK; 07-16-2015 at 05:08 PM.
The following users liked this post:
MonkeyTrucker (09-02-2015)
Old 07-16-2015, 05:14 PM
  #75  
Former Sponsor
 
ExcelerateRep's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Branford, CT
Posts: 2,228
Received 350 Likes on 287 Posts
We carry a wide assortment of alignment products from brands like SPC, Skunk2, Eibach, and Progress. There are plenty of great options depending on your needs and what you're looking to achieve.

Suspension - Excelerate - HOA - Japanese Performance Specialist
Old 07-16-2015, 06:30 PM
  #76  
Safety Car
iTrader: (7)
 
thisaznboi88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Jose, CA/ Charleston, WV
Posts: 4,045
Received 619 Likes on 459 Posts
Originally Posted by 3GTLCHICK
Here is your doughnut, sweetheart. We can also call it muffin pie...haha. See link in post 69.
here some more donuts. So please keep recommending them








The following 2 users liked this post by thisaznboi88:
EvilVirus (07-19-2015), MonkeyTrucker (09-02-2015)
Old 07-17-2015, 02:36 PM
  #77  
Instructor
 
3GTLCHICK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: So Cal
Posts: 169
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Do you guys want to get together for a class action suit? I'm out a ton of money here. Tires...alignments...labor. Ingalls and the vendors here don't really care about this issue or us in my opinion. I guess I could be wrong, but actions speak louder than words. Marcus didn't have any good words if you followed our exchange, then he just bailed out when it wasn't to his liking.

This is a huge nuisance and safety issue.
Old 07-17-2015, 02:54 PM
  #78  
Safety Car
iTrader: (7)
 
thisaznboi88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Jose, CA/ Charleston, WV
Posts: 4,045
Received 619 Likes on 459 Posts
I don't have record of my purchase it's been over 6 years. I had firestone lifetime warranty and they were pissed I came in every 3 months
Old 07-17-2015, 03:13 PM
  #79  
Jeff
iTrader: (3)
 
Oh Sickest TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Port City, New Brunswick Canada
Posts: 5,728
Received 815 Likes on 726 Posts
jesus
Old 07-17-2015, 04:01 PM
  #80  
Burning Brakes
 
t-rd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: HERE
Age: 49
Posts: 979
Received 123 Likes on 99 Posts
It is MASSIVELY annoying that Excelerate keeps jumping in to "recommend Ingalls."

I aligned about 5 times in 3 years while on Ingalls. The rear toe was way off every single time. I have record of my purchase. It's pointless if a vendor or Ingalls would just give you another set of the same ones with the same problem. I'm more than 6 months out on the last alignment, now with SPC upper arms. Car is still straight as an arrow. My summer gas mileage also improved 2 to 3 mpg because of this good setup.

For a class action lawsuit, we would need to gather a whole load of people to win though
The following users liked this post:
MonkeyTrucker (09-02-2015)

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Ingalls or SPC rear camber kit ?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 AM.