Technology Get the latest on technology, electronics and software…

Amazon Glacier

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-17-2017, 11:33 AM
  #1  
Needs more Lemon Pledge
Thread Starter
 
stogie1020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 51
Posts: 52,768
Received 2,000 Likes on 1,173 Posts
Amazon Glacier

Anyone else using Glacier for backups?

I found a nice program that makes uploads/downloads pretty easy, along with folder/sub-folder creation, etc.

It's called FastGlacier and the paid version is $40. The free version gives you two upload "channels" so it may be kind of slow, but the paid version lets you set as many upload channels as you want (there is a functional limit of what's practical based on your ISP upload speed). I currently have a 150GB backup running with 20 channels and it's running at ~95MB/s.

FastGlacier also allows for client side encrypted upload and compression.

https://fastglacier.com/
Old 01-17-2017, 12:11 PM
  #2  
Needs more Lemon Pledge
Thread Starter
 
stogie1020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 51
Posts: 52,768
Received 2,000 Likes on 1,173 Posts
Speeds (upload) settled down to about 4-6MB/s... on a 20MB/s up line.
Old 01-17-2017, 12:53 PM
  #3  
Go Giants
 
Whiskers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: PA
Age: 52
Posts: 69,899
Received 1,231 Likes on 821 Posts
Interesting
Old 01-18-2017, 12:51 PM
  #4  
Team Owner
 
Doom878's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Miami, FL
Age: 45
Posts: 27,883
Received 1,287 Likes on 952 Posts
I assume Glacier is more a commercial product?
Old 01-18-2017, 03:30 PM
  #5  
Needs more Lemon Pledge
Thread Starter
 
stogie1020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 51
Posts: 52,768
Received 2,000 Likes on 1,173 Posts
Originally Posted by Doom878
I assume Glacier is more a commercial product?
It's super low cost Amazon S3 storage. It's low cost because the expectation of retrieval is low, so there are built in delays (retrieval can be delayed by 4 hours, etc.) and the cost to retrieve is significantly higher than the cost to store (around $0.004/GB)

it's certainly not as simple to work/manage as something like Carbonite or Crashplan, but it's cheap, effective and when you need to store terabytes of data, pretty cost effective.

The following users liked this post:
Doom878 (01-19-2017)
Old 01-19-2017, 02:32 AM
  #6  
_
 
AZuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,692
Received 3,097 Likes on 1,867 Posts
?How to Use Amazon Glacier as a Dirt Cheap Backup Solution
The following users liked this post:
Doom878 (01-19-2017)
Old 09-28-2018, 11:27 AM
  #7  
Needs more Lemon Pledge
Thread Starter
 
stogie1020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 51
Posts: 52,768
Received 2,000 Likes on 1,173 Posts
I am now approaching 24TB stored in Amazon Glacier, and am still using FastGlacier to perform the uploads.

While I have not had to perform any restores yet (and hopefully never will), I am pleased with both the cost and service, as well as the FastGlacier program.
The following users liked this post:
doopstr (09-28-2018)




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:43 AM.