General Car Talk Discussion Thread

Old 08-29-2014, 02:10 AM
  #10041  
Chapter Leader (Southern Region)
 
Majofo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Waffles, BU
Posts: 88,888
Received 11,841 Likes on 8,573 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
310 in the Mustang. But a tune should hit 350 easily.
Well shit..

Originally Posted by oonowindoo
...why does diesel cars always/usually have some kind of FI with it?
Sam hit many of the marks in regards to what gave diesels a bad rep and indeed older gen diesel cars and trucks ran NA Diesel. But the main reason most if not all modern diesels are FI is it takes a fucking long time to get it going from a standstill. 0-60 in about 3 weeks.. One of the first vehicles I drove was an old NA diesel truck. I can't tell you how many times people fucking honked at me after the light turned green, or got passed in a fit of rage.

I'm super fucking surprised how little you guys know about the history of diesel engines and the basic properties of them. :aman:
Old 08-29-2014, 02:14 AM
  #10042  
Chapter Leader (Southern Region)
 
Majofo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Waffles, BU
Posts: 88,888
Received 11,841 Likes on 8,573 Posts
Diesel engines, especially the old NA ones were as tough as they came. You could fill the tank with piss and cigarette butts and it would find a way to combust it. Now even adding boost, they are still super reliable, they're built for it. So you might ask.. well fuck.. why not boost the shit out of it..

Well.. that power has to go to the wheels somehow.. My brosef has a 10 second twin turbo diesel dually. Huge fucking hair dryers.. He's in the upper 900's..

..and on his 6th transmission.
Old 08-29-2014, 02:18 AM
  #10043  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
Originally Posted by Majofo
Well shit..



Sam hit many of the marks in regards to what gave diesels a bad rep and indeed older gen diesel cars and trucks ran NA Diesel. But the main reason most if not all modern diesels are FI is it takes a fucking long time to get it going from a standstill. 0-60 in about 3 weeks.. One of the first vehicles I drove was an old NA diesel truck. I can't tell you how many times people fucking honked at me after the light turned green, or got passed in a fit of rage.

I'm super fucking surprised how little you guys know about the history of diesel engines and the basic properties of them. :aman:
Well, diesels have always had a stigma about them. At least in the states. So as a result they are less common, and so people know less about them.

If you ask me, I'd rather dunk my nutsack in lava than buy a hybrid over a turbo diesel. One of my not so weird "ideas for a daily" was a Golf TDI. They hold value like crazy for a reason.
Old 08-29-2014, 02:22 AM
  #10044  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
I love diesel from my limited seat time (1 week) with 328d. The problem is there are no affordable turbo diesel cars with enough HP and 6mt out there right now after BMW cut 335d.

Last edited by oonowindoo; 08-29-2014 at 02:24 AM.
Old 08-29-2014, 07:03 AM
  #10045  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
I love diesel from my limited seat time (1 week) with 328d. The problem is there are no affordable turbo diesel cars with enough HP and 6mt out there right now after BMW cut 335d.
If Audi would just bring the 3.0 TDI here in their A4.
Old 08-29-2014, 08:18 AM
  #10046  
Race Director
iTrader: (7)
 
crazyasiantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Clovis CA
Age: 36
Posts: 12,594
Received 596 Likes on 430 Posts
Originally Posted by Majofo
Diesel engines, especially the old NA ones were as tough as they came. You could fill the tank with piss and cigarette butts and it would find a way to combust it. Now even adding boost, they are still super reliable, they're built for it. So you might ask.. well fuck.. why not boost the shit out of it..

Well.. that power has to go to the wheels somehow.. My brosef has a 10 second twin turbo diesel dually. Huge fucking hair dryers.. He's in the upper 900's..

..and on his 6th transmission.

My buddy (who jumped/flipped his truck a few years ago) has a lifted Dmax on 35's. He upgraded the turbo, and I think he's running NOS. any who, it hauls ass. I've never seen all four tires light up like that

I think he's in the 900's as well. If not, he's pretty damn close
Old 08-29-2014, 08:51 AM
  #10047  
Ex-OEM King
 
SamDoe1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 15,870
Received 5,815 Likes on 3,842 Posts
Originally Posted by Costco
Well, diesels have always had a stigma about them. At least in the states. So as a result they are less common, and so people know less about them.

If you ask me, I'd rather dunk my nutsack in lava than buy a hybrid over a turbo diesel. One of my not so weird "ideas for a daily" was a Golf TDI. They hold value like crazy for a reason.
Because people are after gas mileage over just about anything else for their daily commuter car...and what's better than one that gets 50mpg and doesn't have a battery?

Originally Posted by oonowindoo
I love diesel from my limited seat time (1 week) with 328d. The problem is there are no affordable turbo diesel cars with enough HP and 6mt out there right now after BMW cut 335d.
The awesome part about diesel is you can tune the sh1t out of them without fear that you'll blow the engine up. Get a Jetta TDI and you can push some serious power out of that motor with a tune...just make sure you get the manual and not the automatic.
Old 08-29-2014, 01:40 PM
  #10048  
Suzuka Master
 
Rick_TL-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,234
Received 1,194 Likes on 687 Posts
Was looking at the C6 Z06 market today. And man, if you got the cash, now is the perfect time to pick up a mint one. Several ones no younger than 2009 with 30,000 miles avergae (20x on the low, 40x on the high end) on the market, prime examples.

Shame they're just too far out of my reach.
Old 08-29-2014, 01:46 PM
  #10049  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,045
Received 9,952 Likes on 5,135 Posts
would love a C6 Z06. 11.5 @ 127.

unfortunately not in reach for me right now either.

Old 08-29-2014, 01:46 PM
  #10050  
Registered Bike Offender
iTrader: (3)
 
Vlad_Type_S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Age: 35
Posts: 2,788
Received 843 Likes on 625 Posts
^Nice. That's why I'll probably never buy a car new. Have patience and a great deal will eventually present itself. Gotta be okay with sitting on other people's farts tho.
Old 08-29-2014, 01:48 PM
  #10051  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,045
Received 9,952 Likes on 5,135 Posts
Originally Posted by Vlad_Type_S
^Nice. That's why I'll probably never buy a car new. Have patience and a great deal will eventually present itself. Gotta be okay with sitting on other people's farts tho.
if you have a really big problem with that you could always buy new seats.
Old 08-29-2014, 01:59 PM
  #10052  
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
CLtotheTL32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Charlotte
Age: 35
Posts: 36,653
Received 9,493 Likes on 6,165 Posts
Originally Posted by Rick_TL-S
Was looking at the C6 Z06 market today. And man, if you got the cash, now is the perfect time to pick up a mint one. Several ones no younger than 2009 with 30,000 miles average (20x on the low, 40x on the high end) on the market, prime examples.

Shame they're just too far out of my reach.
My uncle just got one; 2007 with only 5k miles. While I don't know exactly what he paid for it, he said he basically stole it. My cousin took it out near NASA and got it up to 120 before getting pulled over
Old 08-31-2014, 06:39 PM
  #10053  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,045
Received 9,952 Likes on 5,135 Posts
General Car Talk Discussion Thread-fm52nqd.jpg
Old 08-31-2014, 06:41 PM
  #10054  
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
CLtotheTL32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Charlotte
Age: 35
Posts: 36,653
Received 9,493 Likes on 6,165 Posts
Damn the NSX looks tiny
The following users liked this post:
Aman (08-31-2014)
Old 08-31-2014, 08:04 PM
  #10055  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,045
Received 9,952 Likes on 5,135 Posts
I think it's fast

The following users liked this post:
Aman (08-31-2014)
Old 08-31-2014, 10:55 PM
  #10056  
Suzuka Master
 
YeuEmMaiMai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,863
Received 435 Likes on 342 Posts
Originally Posted by SamDoe1
I did a lot of work on diesel engines in skool, I'll try and answer some of these...



Yes, you can run a diesel without a turbo. Many larger applications of diesel engines running for max torque rather than max power (ships/trains/generators for example) will run a diesel without a turbo.

Many older cars/trucks came without a turbo diesel. These are the super smoky and smelly cars that gave diesel a bad name to begin with. The non-FI diesel engines tend to not burn as cleanly because of lower combustion pressures, adding a turbo increases that pressure and provides a more complete fuel burn.

In the automotive world, a diesel all but needs to come with a turbo. A N/A diesel motor will produce a lot less power than a similarly sized N/A gas engine and because the diesel motor weighs a lot more due to component weight, something needs to be done to bring the power to weight ratio more in line with a gas engine. Turbos aren't all that heavy and can add a ton of power, hence why they are included. Add to that the fact that you can basically run a diesel up to max operating pressure in terms of boost and it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to not run a turbo. There doesn't need to be any knock sensors or timing changes because the fuel is injected at the time of combustion and...well there's no spark plug to adjust timing on...



Low end torque is inherent to any diesel, the turbo aids in the high end power. Turbos were added in the late 60's to early 70's to long haul trucks because that's when the interstate system was ramping up to what it is now. Before then, a lot of transport was by train and trucks didn't need to travel at high speeds, that's what requires horsepower as I'm sure you know.



Your instructor is absolutely right. The turbo just helps the higher end of the rev range by shoving more air and fuel into the combustion space.

An exhaust path has an effect on any engine regardless of fuel choice. The biggest part of a turbo system is exhaust pulse timing, you want the engine to send a pulse of exhaust gas at the exact time a turbine blade is in position to take full advantage of it. If the system is timed between blades, you lose power. If the system is sometimes between blades, you lose power. Downstream of the turbo, the bigger the better since you want to evacuate the gas as fast as possible. The reason that large trucks have large exhausts is simply because they have a large volume of expelled exhaust to get rid of. A 1.8L diesel engine in a passenger car doesn't have a whole lot of exhaust gas to expel. A 15L+ diesel engine in a semi truck has a hell of a lot more to push out.

Hope this helps.
while smaller gensets are typically non turbo, the bigger ones are definitely turbocharged and quite often run 2-4 turbos for maximum engine power... the 2+MW monters CAT have are beats....

Old 09-02-2014, 06:01 PM
  #10057  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,200
Received 22,626 Likes on 13,878 Posts
Sharing an image I found of the BMW M3 and M4 cabrios through the years...

The following 5 users liked this post by Yumcha:
crazyasiantl (09-03-2014), Mr. Maker (09-03-2014), RPhilMan1 (09-03-2014), tsxymazda (09-06-2014), ttribe (09-03-2014)
Old 09-02-2014, 06:18 PM
  #10058  
'08 MX5 GT 6spd.
 
MarbleGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Lone Star State
Posts: 6,234
Received 1,192 Likes on 485 Posts
Fantastic example of how extraordinarily talented designers can make something new and refreshing while keeping it familiar.
Old 09-03-2014, 11:45 AM
  #10059  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,200
Received 22,626 Likes on 13,878 Posts
I <3 the Unimog...

Arnuld's goes up for sale if you're BoostedJack-rich and can afford it and the gas it'll drink...

From here: http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1...es-up-for-sale

Some people just don't look right in regular cars. Arnold Schwarzenegger is one of those people. The man who made a Harley-Davidson Fat Boy look small in Terminator 2: Judgement Day has counted a HumVee, a Unimog and even a tank among his personal vehicles, all of which seem strangely appropriate for a man who made his name beating, shooting and killing his foes on the silver screen.

Now, his Unimog—a Unimog U1300 SE 6.4 made to his own specifications—is up for sale on German classifieds Mobile (via World Car Fans). And if you've got the required 200,000 euros or so to buy it, you too can absorb some of Arnie's powers. Or something. Whatever happens, you'll have a pretty striking vehicle which is road-legal in the U.S, as well as its native Germany. As a 1977 model, it also benefits from full vintage car approval in its home country—though it does have a more modern engine.
Schwarzenegger might have been supportive of several green policies during his time as Governator of California, but the Unimog's 6.4-liter, 320-horsepower turbodiesel isn't exactly the cleanest of lumps. Designed more for commercial use, it only complies with Euro 3 emissions regulations which came into force in January 2000 and permit over ten times the harmful particulate matter that current European regulations do. Still, this probably won't be a daily driver for its eventual owner, who might instead appreciate the 22-inch wheels and Michelin XZL 445/65 tires, the air suspension, the trailer brake system, roll bar, Hella lights or the flatbed—complete with a built-in bench seat for three.

Its full after-tax price of 208,250 euros (175,000 before Germany's 19 percent purchase tax) could be considered a bargain, though. That currently equates to just under $275,000, or only around $25,000 more than it was originally rumored to cost when Arnie took delivery. There's some celebrity mark-up there for sure (Arnie's signature even features on the dash), but it only shows 2,100 kilometers (1,300 miles) on the odometer and as a 1977 example it's definitely a classic (of sorts)—and we all know the classic market is on its way up...



The following users liked this post:
00TL-P3.2 (09-03-2014)
Old 09-03-2014, 12:42 PM
  #10060  
Suzuka Master
 
Rick_TL-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,234
Received 1,194 Likes on 687 Posts
So I had to make a delivery at work today down south past Motorsport Ranch in Granbury. About a QTR mike away from the track, I notice this really aggressive Charger with a duck tail spoiler. As she went by, I noticed it had Michigan M plates and sure enough, it was a Hellcat.

Tried to speed up to grab a pic, but she turned onto the track entrance road. Unfortunately, I didn't have a lot of time to spare, so I couldn't follow it. Did sound amazing coming off the light though.
Old 09-03-2014, 01:47 PM
  #10061  
Team Owner
iTrader: (4)
 
Mr. Maker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southeast, Va
Posts: 22,956
Received 3,628 Likes on 1,768 Posts
Love the E46.
Old 09-03-2014, 06:44 PM
  #10062  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
Miata being revealed today:

Old 09-03-2014, 06:47 PM
  #10063  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 31
Posts: 17,427
Received 1,484 Likes on 1,048 Posts
Sweet. Lots of hype around this car, can't wait to finally see it.
Old 09-04-2014, 06:12 AM
  #10064  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,045
Received 9,952 Likes on 5,135 Posts
Miata looks pretty nice and I think it's a nice evolution for the marque. Well done Mazda.



lol got to love social media... Nissan tweeted to deadmau5

Old 09-04-2014, 07:06 AM
  #10065  
Living the Dream
 
cmschmie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: near Charlotte
Age: 44
Posts: 4,924
Received 130 Likes on 71 Posts
I didn’t want to start a new thread for this...
I had been planning on purchasing a new car sometime early next year but that timeline may be moved up since I was rear ended a couple weeks ago. I doubt the car will be totaled but I would like to be prepared just in case.

The car that has been high my list for a while is the Golf TDI. I like the styling and love the mpg. My commute is 45 miles each way and 40 of that is interstate.
My question for you is what other vehicles should I have on my radar? Available now or early next year (if car is not totaled).
I like hatchbacks/wagons but am not opposed to sedans. Current car is a 2006 TSX (non-nav) 6-spd

Requirements:
Good mpg (above 35 ideal)
Below $30k
Heated seats
Auto or manual (doesn’t matter)
Bluetooth

Nice to haves:
Homelink
Nav
Satellite radio (this is almost a requirement...)

Other cars that I have looked at (on-line only) are:
new Honda Fit (just not sure how “solid” it will feel but Honda reliability a plus)
Mazda 3 (love the exterior, not sure about interior with that stupid nav/info screen layout)
Subaru Impreza (a little boring)
Subaru Outback (checks a lot of the boxes but mpg could be better)
the 2015 (2016) VW Golf Wagon TDI when it hits our shores in early 2015

Last edited by cmschmie; 09-04-2014 at 07:11 AM.
Old 09-04-2014, 07:25 AM
  #10066  
Living the Dream
 
cmschmie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: near Charlotte
Age: 44
Posts: 4,924
Received 130 Likes on 71 Posts
Damnit, too late to edit:
The Subaru Impreza may currently be #2 on the list. I like the utility of it.
The mileage could be better and I am not 100% sold on CVTs.
Old 09-04-2014, 07:47 AM
  #10067  
Race Director
iTrader: (7)
 
crazyasiantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Clovis CA
Age: 36
Posts: 12,594
Received 596 Likes on 430 Posts
If you're looking for an appliance, the Civic is a good choice. Mine has been mostly problem free. I'm at 30k in about a year and a half, and I've averaged 42mpgs after a long six hour drive.

I think there are better/funner options if that's what you want.

from your list, I'd go Golf or Mazda3

Last edited by crazyasiantl; 09-04-2014 at 07:49 AM.
Old 09-04-2014, 08:18 AM
  #10068  
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
 
civicdrivr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: VA
Age: 35
Posts: 35,916
Received 8,130 Likes on 4,801 Posts
I'd go Golf.
Old 09-04-2014, 09:02 AM
  #10069  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
Originally Posted by civicdrivr
I'd go Golf.
I would definitely consider that. With that said, the MK6 JSW TDIs are going for well under invoice in some areas.

But if I had my choice, I'd rather have the new Mk7 TDI.

I haven't been inside the Mazda3 but I don't think I'd get tired of looking at a Mazda3 S in my driveway.

I can get around 29-30mpg in 75H/25C driving in my Focus ST. I don't think you necessarily need to go buy some econobox with a hamster motor.
Old 09-04-2014, 09:24 AM
  #10070  
Living the Dream
 
cmschmie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: near Charlotte
Age: 44
Posts: 4,924
Received 130 Likes on 71 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
I would definitely consider that. With that said, the MK6 JSW TDIs are going for well under invoice in some areas.

But if I had my choice, I'd rather have the new Mk7 TDI.

I haven't been inside the Mazda3 but I don't think I'd get tired of looking at a Mazda3 S in my driveway.

I can get around 29-30mpg in 75H/25C driving in my Focus ST. I don't think you necessarily need to go buy some econobox with a hamster motor.
Yeah, not looking at 100% econoboxes and it is nice with the TSX to have the ability to drive "move" when the need arises (passing on country roads, merging onto interstates etc...). I may add the GTI to the list, but I think the price will start to creep too high.

The cars that I will more than likely test drive first are:
Golf TDI SE (probably DSG)
Mazda 3S Touring or Grand Touring (maybe an i Grand Touring with manual)
Subaru Impreza Sport Limited
Old 09-04-2014, 09:27 AM
  #10071  
Moderator
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 25,643
Received 5,282 Likes on 3,621 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
I would definitely consider that. With that said, the MK6 JSW TDIs are going for well under invoice in some areas.

But if I had my choice, I'd rather have the new Mk7 TDI.

I haven't been inside the Mazda3 but I don't think I'd get tired of looking at a Mazda3 S in my driveway.

I can get around 29-30mpg in 75H/25C driving in my Focus ST. I don't think you necessarily need to go buy some econobox with a hamster motor.
I've driven the 6MT 3i & it's not a bad drive. The one I drove was the only 6MT they had at the time (Dec last year) so it was a basic Touring model sedan.

The 3s 6MT should have started hitting lots now.

I'm trying to keep the TL going long enough to see what comes out in the next months. Maybe wait for the new MX5.
Old 09-04-2014, 09:36 AM
  #10072  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
Originally Posted by 00TL-P3.2
I've driven the 6MT 3i & it's not a bad drive. The one I drove was the only 6MT they had at the time (Dec last year) so it was a basic Touring model sedan.

The 3s 6MT should have started hitting lots now.

I'm trying to keep the TL going long enough to see what comes out in the next months. Maybe wait for the new MX5.
The Mazda website doesn't list the 3S having a 6MT option yet : /
Old 09-04-2014, 09:42 AM
  #10073  
Ex-OEM King
 
SamDoe1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 15,870
Received 5,815 Likes on 3,842 Posts
Golf SportWagen would be the only thing on that list I'd consider. The new Fit is fine but like you said, you only get so much quality out of that price point. The Golf SW TDI can be tuned for wicked performance and also for awesome economy all with the same motor, that's not something you can do with any of the other cars.

If you're just looking for a commuter and don't care, my friend bought a brand new Hyundai Accident for like $15k, it gets 40ish mpg and isn't horrible in quality. Definitely not good and certainly not as good as the VW but far cheaper and with the 100k powertrain warranty...it's a bargain to run for a long time.
Old 09-04-2014, 10:29 AM
  #10074  
Moderator
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 25,643
Received 5,282 Likes on 3,621 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
The Mazda website doesn't list the 3S having a 6MT option yet : /
They're out, just MazdaUSA hasn't updated the site. You can configure one on Edmunds & a few people on Mazdas247 & M3Rev have picked one up already.
Old 09-04-2014, 10:34 AM
  #10075  
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
 
civicdrivr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: VA
Age: 35
Posts: 35,916
Received 8,130 Likes on 4,801 Posts
Speaking of Mazda, what do you guys think of the new MX-5?
Old 09-04-2014, 11:26 AM
  #10076  
Moderator
 
ttribe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 15,266
Received 5,877 Likes on 2,896 Posts
Originally Posted by civicdrivr
Speaking of Mazda, what do you guys think of the new MX-5?
I like it.
Old 09-04-2014, 11:27 AM
  #10077  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,200
Received 22,626 Likes on 13,878 Posts
Originally Posted by civicdrivr
Speaking of Mazda, what do you guys think of the new MX-5?
Not bad...I prefer the look of the prior/existing gen still...But, time will tell if I like the new look more.
Old 09-04-2014, 11:50 AM
  #10078  
Moderator
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 25,643
Received 5,282 Likes on 3,621 Posts
Originally Posted by civicdrivr
Speaking of Mazda, what do you guys think of the new MX-5?
I'm liking it from the few shots available. TG:UK had a few more shots than some of the other sites I've seen. Not sure if the US will get the dash mounted tablet that the Euro/JDM units will get.

Originally Posted by Yumcha
Not bad...I prefer the look of the prior/existing gen still...But, time will tell if I like the new look more.
I never was a huge fan of the NC. If the ND comes in as light as has been rumored & is NA-gen fun to drive. I'll be sold.
Old 09-04-2014, 12:59 PM
  #10079  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
The MX-5 has strayed from the typical British roadster look that it's had since its inception, but I like it a lot better.
Old 09-04-2014, 01:21 PM
  #10080  
Race Director
iTrader: (7)
 
crazyasiantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Clovis CA
Age: 36
Posts: 12,594
Received 596 Likes on 430 Posts
Originally Posted by SamDoe1
Golf SportWagen would be the only thing on that list I'd consider. The new Fit is fine but like you said, you only get so much quality out of that price point. The Golf SW TDI can be tuned for wicked performance and also for awesome economy all with the same motor, that's not something you can do with any of the other cars.

If you're just looking for a commuter and don't care, my friend bought a brand new Hyundai Accident for like $15k, it gets 40ish mpg and isn't horrible in quality. Definitely not good and certainly not as good as the VW but far cheaper and with the 100k powertrain warranty...it's a bargain to run for a long time.
Isn't VW releasing the Golf GTD? I'd get that

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: General Car Talk Discussion Thread



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44 PM.