TSX Dynos
#87
Stokeless
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: South East Daygo
Age: 44
Posts: 2,856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JTso
K&N CAI, DC header, Hondata gasket and TB bypass mod
nice....i need to do those mods...buty im lazy right now and its cold out so yea hahaha. If I do do them Im gonna have to be really motivated. Im really debating on doing a turbo on my car custom or just waiting...I am pickin up a hatch and droppin my GSR turbo motor in there...we will see what i do here soon haha
#91
Moderator Alumnus
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
4 Posts
Check out the guy's comments I quoted here, post #9: https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=17469
#92
Audi Driving Snob
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For fun I input this dyno into cartest and ran a simulation.
Stock it gives a time of an optimum 0-60 of 6.9 seconds and 1/4 in 15.3. Interestingly it says you'll get better times by dumping the clutch at 1800 as opposed to slipping it at 3000 rpms like most people who have gone to the track do. I have a feeling in the simulation it has slightly better traction than stock.(which is tweakable just haven't gotten around to it yet)
Hondata + I/H/E 0-60 5.43 seconds, 1/4 at 14.1 @99mph.
Stock it gives a time of an optimum 0-60 of 6.9 seconds and 1/4 in 15.3. Interestingly it says you'll get better times by dumping the clutch at 1800 as opposed to slipping it at 3000 rpms like most people who have gone to the track do. I have a feeling in the simulation it has slightly better traction than stock.(which is tweakable just haven't gotten around to it yet)
Hondata + I/H/E 0-60 5.43 seconds, 1/4 at 14.1 @99mph.
#94
Audi Driving Snob
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stokeless_TSX
Tinky can you put my inputs into this simulator and see what it comes out to? My dyno sheet it posted here somewhere in the thread.
I'll try and have it up this afternoon...boss is out the door at 2 today = pwing
#95
Moderator Alumnus
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
4 Posts
Originally Posted by TinkySD
For fun I input this dyno into cartest and ran a simulation.
Stock it gives a time of an optimum 0-60 of 6.9 seconds and 1/4 in 15.3. Interestingly it says you'll get better times by dumping the clutch at 1800 as opposed to slipping it at 3000 rpms like most people who have gone to the track do. I have a feeling in the simulation it has slightly better traction than stock.(which is tweakable just haven't gotten around to it yet)
Stock it gives a time of an optimum 0-60 of 6.9 seconds and 1/4 in 15.3. Interestingly it says you'll get better times by dumping the clutch at 1800 as opposed to slipping it at 3000 rpms like most people who have gone to the track do. I have a feeling in the simulation it has slightly better traction than stock.(which is tweakable just haven't gotten around to it yet)
#97
Euro Accord 2.4 VS Acura TSX
What i've heard it that TSX and the Euro Accord is having the same power HP but the way we calculate hp is different (SAE Hp and DIN Hp) and that this would explain the 10 HP differance.
Isn't this a possibility?
What i've heard it that TSX and the Euro Accord is having the same power HP but the way we calculate hp is different (SAE Hp and DIN Hp) and that this would explain the 10 HP differance.
Isn't this a possibility?
#98
Finally, I had my TSX dyno'd tonight. I went to the same place where Hondata had their car dyno'd at.........at Church Automotive Testing. Therefore, the dyno is of the Dynapack (not a Dynojet). I forgot to get a print out from Shawn Church, but I did get the data from his computer. I plotted the data in Excel and generated the graph. Unfortunately, my site is down now so I can't upload it. I'll upload it and post it here whenever my site is back up. For now, I'll just say that my TSX's max power is 185.9 hp and max torque is 158.2 ft-lbs. My TSX is totally stock (engine wise).
#99
Audi Driving Snob
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by vwong
Finally, I had my TSX dyno'd tonight. I went to the same place where Hondata had their car dyno'd at.........at Church Automotive Testing. Therefore, the dyno is of the Dynapack (not a Dynojet). I forgot to get a print out from Shawn Church, but I did get the data from his computer. I plotted the data in Excel and generated the graph. Unfortunately, my site is down now so I can't upload it. I'll upload it and post it here whenever my site is back up. For now, I'll just say that my TSX's max power is 185.9 hp and max torque is 158.2 ft-lbs. My TSX is totally stock (engine wise).
#101
Originally Posted by vwong
Finally, I had my TSX dyno'd tonight. I went to the same place where Hondata had their car dyno'd at.........at Church Automotive Testing. Therefore, the dyno is of the Dynapack (not a Dynojet). I forgot to get a print out from Shawn Church, but I did get the data from his computer. I plotted the data in Excel and generated the graph. Unfortunately, my site is down now so I can't upload it. I'll upload it and post it here whenever my site is back up. For now, I'll just say that my TSX's max power is 185.9 hp and max torque is 158.2 ft-lbs. My TSX is totally stock (engine wise).
hmmmmmmm
#104
Bye TSX, hello domestic?
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NOVA
Age: 42
Posts: 8,552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
for the love of god people, please stick to dynojet's when possible. there's many more out there and a whole lot more dyno's available have been done on dynojets.
#105
Originally Posted by xizor
for the love of god people, please stick to dynojet's when possible. there's many more out there and a whole lot more dyno's available have been done on dynojets.
#106
Bye TSX, hello domestic?
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NOVA
Age: 42
Posts: 8,552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by vwong
So, IMO, I think the Dynapack is better.
#107
Originally Posted by xizor
the best we can do is compare curves I guess.
I had my Prelude (before the rebuild) dyno'd on a Dynojet before, and then again after the rebuild on a Dynapack. I can't really compare the two, but at least I can compare the Prelude's power to the TSX's power now.
#108
Audi Driving Snob
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The number one most interesting comparison I, and I think most of us would like to see is a stock tsx before and after reflash. You can make our dreams come true vwong!
haha, j/k, but i'm interested to see it for one big reason. Hondata says the tsx flash/vtec lowering an be used with stock airbox/headers while the rsx flash requires a cai. Kurt says he feels some serious gains with just an icebox which is not significantly different from stock.
haha, j/k, but i'm interested to see it for one big reason. Hondata says the tsx flash/vtec lowering an be used with stock airbox/headers while the rsx flash requires a cai. Kurt says he feels some serious gains with just an icebox which is not significantly different from stock.
#109
Originally Posted by xizor
for the love of god people, please stick to dynojet's when possible. there's many more out there and a whole lot more dyno's available have been done on dynojets.
#110
Originally Posted by Stokeless_TSX
I bet if I went to a dynopack I would at the 200 or so mark...curious.
:troutslap.
you sure talk the talk dude. but can you walk the walk?
get dynoed and stop screwing around hehe.
:troutslap
#111
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Huntington Beach
Age: 42
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by vwong
Finally, I had my TSX dyno'd tonight. I went to the same place where Hondata had their car dyno'd at.........at Church Automotive Testing. Therefore, the dyno is of the Dynapack (not a Dynojet). I forgot to get a print out from Shawn Church, but I did get the data from his computer. I plotted the data in Excel and generated the graph. Unfortunately, my site is down now so I can't upload it. I'll upload it and post it here whenever my site is back up. For now, I'll just say that my TSX's max power is 185.9 hp and max torque is 158.2 ft-lbs. My TSX is totally stock (engine wise).
Since we both did the dyno at the same place, it's safer to compare our cars.
The differences are 10.8hps and 10.8 lbs/ft.
So in conclusion, injen cai and hondata together added 10.8 "peak" hps and torque for my car.
Also, your car did 185.9 / 200hps stock = 7.05% loss in drive train according to this type of dyno.Meaning, my car is at around peak 210.6 hps.
While hondata's with the header is at 210 x 1.0705 = peak 224.8hps
Damn, i want a header for those high end gains....
Oh yeah, i also have a dyno graph showing the injen cold air intake actaully beating the $%^# out of both comptech intake and header without hondata.
If anyone wants to host it and compare hondata's tsx with comptech header and intake without hondata vs my car with injen intake without hondata, let me know. I am very happy I went with injen as should most of you in this forum. I cant wait to have an injen cai and header combo.... it'll be the bomb! hopefully peak will reach near 230 - 240ish at the crank.
#112
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Huntington Beach
Age: 42
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
on another interesting note... 192.4hp was my peak with injen cai without hondata. So injen cai did a 6.5 peak hp increase for me. torque was 166.9, so 8.7lbs/feet torque max. Wow! injen gave me more torque than hp lol
#113
Originally Posted by taewlee
Also, your car did 185.9 / 200hps stock = 7.05% loss in drive train according to this type of dyno.Meaning, my car is at around peak 210.6 hps.
BTW, he said that the Dynapack is measuring the hp and torque at the hubs, not the flywheel or the crank. IMHO, I like to think that the Dynapack is measuring at the wheels while the Dynojet is measuring the hp and torque that are actually applied to the ground, therefore wheel size and tire choice is in consideration in this case.
#114
Photography Nerd
Originally Posted by taewlee
Good info, my car with injen cai and hondata peaks were 196.7hp and 169.0 ft-lbs...
Since we both did the dyno at the same place, it's safer to compare our cars.
The differences are 10.8hps and 10.8 lbs/ft.
So in conclusion, injen cai and hondata together added 10.8 "peak" hps and torque for my car.
Since we both did the dyno at the same place, it's safer to compare our cars.
The differences are 10.8hps and 10.8 lbs/ft.
So in conclusion, injen cai and hondata together added 10.8 "peak" hps and torque for my car.
Also, your car did 185.9 / 200hps stock = 7.05% loss in drive train according to this type of dyno.Meaning, my car is at around peak 210.6 hps.
While hondata's with the header is at 210 x 1.0705 = peak 224.8hps
Damn, i want a header for those high end gains....
While hondata's with the header is at 210 x 1.0705 = peak 224.8hps
Damn, i want a header for those high end gains....
#115
Audi Driving Snob
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good info vwong. On dyno jets tsx usually dyno 2-4 hp higher than 01-04 rsxs, all the while with much heavier/larger wheel and tire packages. By eliminated that is a variable and locking it to a hub I think you can see the effects pretty well.
Tawelee I would lvoe to see that dyno and i can host it. Send it to me jeffc31337@yahoo.com
Tawelee I would lvoe to see that dyno and i can host it. Send it to me jeffc31337@yahoo.com
#116
Stokeless
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: South East Daygo
Age: 44
Posts: 2,856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dzuy
:blah:
:troutslap.
you sure talk the talk dude. but can you walk the walk?
get dynoed and stop screwing around hehe.
:troutslap
:troutslap.
you sure talk the talk dude. but can you walk the walk?
get dynoed and stop screwing around hehe.
:troutslap
#117
Originally Posted by TinkySD
Good info vwong. On dyno jets tsx usually dyno 2-4 hp higher than 01-04 rsxs, all the while with much heavier/larger wheel and tire packages. By eliminated that is a variable and locking it to a hub I think you can see the effects pretty well.
Tawelee I would lvoe to see that dyno and i can host it. Send it to me jeffc31337@yahoo.com
Tawelee I would lvoe to see that dyno and i can host it. Send it to me jeffc31337@yahoo.com
#118
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Huntington Beach
Age: 42
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
email sent, please host my picture if you can, im using photobucket and that thing makes the images smaller like the last dyno i posted. Anyways, if you look at the dyno, the solid blue and purple lines are my car.
The dotted green and blue lines are hondatas.
Solid blue is my car with only injen cai
Dotted blue is hondata's
As you can see, they beat each other at different rpms.... injen cai and comptech stuff definetely have their own torque curve characteristics... however, if you compare the area under the cover which I consider more important than the peak, you can see that the injen cai alone gives more torque at around 1 - 2rpm, 3.5 - 5 rpm, and 6.5 - 7.2 rpm. Injen is the bomb!!!! Hondata likes inejn as well and hondata has requested an intake system from injen for their tsx.
The dotted green and blue lines are hondatas.
Solid blue is my car with only injen cai
Dotted blue is hondata's
As you can see, they beat each other at different rpms.... injen cai and comptech stuff definetely have their own torque curve characteristics... however, if you compare the area under the cover which I consider more important than the peak, you can see that the injen cai alone gives more torque at around 1 - 2rpm, 3.5 - 5 rpm, and 6.5 - 7.2 rpm. Injen is the bomb!!!! Hondata likes inejn as well and hondata has requested an intake system from injen for their tsx.
#119
Originally Posted by Stokeless_TSX
Been dynoed its just so old its not posted anymore. And from that dyno I still have more power than anyone here. And it was on a dynojet not pack so thats what I was saying. On a Pack I should be higher than what i had on the jet. Get it.
i wonder how i would do on a dynojet.
#120
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Huntington Beach
Age: 42
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dzuy
it's posted on his hondata review thread.