Supercharged 2010 TL-SH-AWD 6-speed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-2011, 09:30 AM
  #281  
Instructor
 
CapoTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Age: 43
Posts: 117
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
this kit should be offered to the dealers to install as an option
CapoTL is offline  
Old 05-15-2011, 09:52 AM
  #282  
Three Wheelin'
 
jnc2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,439
Received 114 Likes on 66 Posts
Originally Posted by CapoTL
I know that jnc2000 you will get the charger, your car is gonna look fantastic with the wheels and mods you have already!
Thanks man - I've thought about it, but honestly as a DD putting 40-50K miles a year I'm much more tempted to build NA.... but you never know what the future holds.
jnc2000 is offline  
Old 05-15-2011, 01:29 PM
  #283  
Racer
 
maddogtheta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 43
Posts: 371
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
I'm 80% sure that I'm going to pull the trigger on getting this installed in my car, the only things that I'm waiting to find out is the actual total cost to getting this installed, and then I want to make sure that my the TL can handle the power without breaking 6 months down the road from the supercharger.
maddogtheta is offline  
Old 05-15-2011, 03:20 PM
  #284  
Chapter Leader (Southern Region)
 
Majofo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Waffles, BU
Posts: 88,888
Received 11,841 Likes on 8,573 Posts
Originally Posted by maddogtheta
I'm 80% sure that I'm going to pull the trigger on getting this installed in my car, the only things that I'm waiting to find out is the actual total cost to getting this installed, and then I want to make sure that my the TL can handle the power without breaking 6 months down the road from the supercharger.
Rough estimate w/ tune & meth will probably be around $12k if you don't do the install yourself. Reliability..
Majofo is offline  
Old 05-15-2011, 06:07 PM
  #285  
Racer
 
maddogtheta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 43
Posts: 371
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by Majofo
Rough estimate w/ tune & meth will probably be around $12k if you don't do the install yourself. Reliability..
I'm definitely going to have to do some more research on both points, at this point it's a fun project to think of having done to my TL.
maddogtheta is offline  
Old 05-15-2011, 06:14 PM
  #286  
Drifting
iTrader: (5)
 
HeartTLs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Age: 37
Posts: 3,230
Received 416 Likes on 365 Posts
Wow, I was thinking 6k max for a SC. Guess I'll have to stick to cheaper mods...

Originally Posted by Majofo
Rough estimate w/ tune & meth will probably be around $12k if you don't do the install yourself. Reliability..
HeartTLs is offline  
Old 05-15-2011, 06:27 PM
  #287  
Racer
 
maddogtheta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 43
Posts: 371
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
the kit is probably going to be 5k based on ct-e's other sc kits prices, I'm not sure where the other 7k Majofo estimated is going.
maddogtheta is offline  
Old 05-15-2011, 06:52 PM
  #288  
Three Wheelin'
 
jnc2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,439
Received 114 Likes on 66 Posts
Tuning - meth - install

SC shouldn't take more than a day to install..

And honestly you guys that get it really need to think HARD about meth injection and knock monitoring.
jnc2000 is offline  
Old 05-15-2011, 07:05 PM
  #289  
Proud owner of a GoosedTL
 
GoosedTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Raeford, NC originally from NJ
Age: 38
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think a good turbo setup will be better!
GoosedTL is offline  
Old 05-15-2011, 08:38 PM
  #290  
Instructor
 
CapoTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Age: 43
Posts: 117
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I just dont see a turbo kit being right for this car, to me its a luxury car(or adleast the most luxury car I ever owned). It wouldnt feel or sound right to me, be a little bit too ricey for my taste. A supercharger would fit the bill nice. As long as the kit is all bolt on and the setup and tuning is rock solid it would compliment the car nicely. I dunno just my opinion.
CapoTL is offline  
Old 05-15-2011, 09:23 PM
  #291  
Three Wheelin'
 
jnc2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,439
Received 114 Likes on 66 Posts
For those that are interested in a little reading..

https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...meth+injection

https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...meth+injection

https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...meth+injection
jnc2000 is offline  
Old 05-16-2011, 01:46 AM
  #292  
Chapter Leader (Southern Region)
 
Majofo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Waffles, BU
Posts: 88,888
Received 11,841 Likes on 8,573 Posts
Originally Posted by CapoTL
I just dont see a turbo kit being right for this car, to me its a luxury car(or adleast the most luxury car I ever owned). It wouldnt feel or sound right to me, be a little bit too ricey for my taste. A supercharger would fit the bill nice. As long as the kit is all bolt on and the setup and tuning is rock solid it would compliment the car nicely. I dunno just my opinion.


Originally Posted by jnc2000
Tuning - meth - install

SC shouldn't take more than a day to install..

And honestly you guys that get it really need to think HARD about meth injection and knock monitoring.
It'll take a easy going weekend if you add meth injection, battery relocation, intercooler, injectors, aftermarket knock sensor, guage mounting (afr, boost, knock) with the S/C and aem fic install. I think most of you guys can do it.. far less cumbersome than installing a turbo and it'll save you at least $1-2k. The next progression would be reducing exhaust restriction, but that's another weekend. Getting the tune down will be a lot more effort.

You AT guys will probably want to do type-f ATF w/ magnefine filter and atf cooler (not sure if you 4G guys already have a cooler or not). I think transfer case and rear diff fluid discussion would be a good to have as well. The rear diff is the last thing you want to fuck up. It'll be more expensive than replacing the transmission.
Majofo is offline  
Old 05-16-2011, 11:06 AM
  #293  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,492
Received 834 Likes on 518 Posts
Originally Posted by Tyresian
When I'm driving on thr highway or with people In the car I don't drive as hard and want good mileage. But I still want the power for padding, fun driving, and to be able to get out of a tight spot that you get put in when the people around you don't know how to drive.
Mpg will go down a bit (may be 5-10% in normal driving?). It won't be a huge difference though. After all, mpg depends on many other factors such as weight of the car, aerodynamics, gearing, driving habits, etc. If you drive hard though then yes mpg will drop a lot because the engine is sucking a lot more air in and you need more fuel to burn.
iforyou is offline  
Old 05-16-2011, 12:02 PM
  #294  
Suzuka Master
 
Mr Marco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,490
Received 609 Likes on 493 Posts
$12k is a lot of money. Other than for the love of the TL, wouldn't one be better off just to buy a 550+hp CTS-V?
I'm reserving my usual save your money quote on this one because you all have my vote for more hp on the 4G.
Mr Marco is offline  
Old 05-16-2011, 12:06 PM
  #295  
13.2@106mph G37 RWD Sedan
iTrader: (3)
 
kdawg8526's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Van. BC
Age: 35
Posts: 1,373
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
^ thats what i was thinking too i love the cts-v its a beast but that thing just guzzles the gas like no tommorow cant afford that with the rising prices of gas too nowadays
kdawg8526 is offline  
Old 05-16-2011, 01:09 PM
  #296  
Suzuka Master
 
Mr Marco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,490
Received 609 Likes on 493 Posts
^good point. That is a 6.2ltr? I never considered that.
Mr Marco is offline  
Old 05-16-2011, 02:48 PM
  #297  
Racer
 
maddogtheta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 43
Posts: 371
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Lots of good reading, I definitely feel like I'm better equipped to ask mostly the right questions about the supercharger for the 2010 TL. Hopefully as CT-e gets closer to releasing the retail version there will be more info regarding what they used for engine management (although I'm pretty sure Rob said they used AEM FIC) I'm definitely interested in finding out what the extra power does to the rear diff and transmission and clutch as well.
maddogtheta is offline  
Old 05-17-2011, 12:35 PM
  #298  
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (1)
 
Pseudomaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Burlington, KY
Age: 46
Posts: 1,523
Received 244 Likes on 137 Posts
I'm thinking there's ever so close to 400 crank horse to be had out of the J37 - just needs a tuneable ECU or an EMS to dial in the fuel and timing after all the bolt-ons.
Pseudomaniac is offline  
Old 05-17-2011, 12:53 PM
  #299  
Racer
 
maddogtheta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 43
Posts: 371
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
I just got back from Acura of Lynnwood having the CT-e axle back exhaust installed on my car (pics later today as well as a short review.). I was able to talk more to Rob about the SC. He was estimating that the SC could be installed at ~6k basing this off of the cost of previous model SC installs. They are using the AEM FIC for engine management which is able to control the AF ratio and I assume other stuff as well.

The SC'd TL wasn't available today so I wasn't able to get any pics or videos this time. I have to say that I'm very excited to see how the SC does on the 09-12 TL's. Rob says that so far the TL has been holding up very well to the boost which he said was ~6psi.
maddogtheta is offline  
Old 05-17-2011, 01:50 PM
  #300  
2010 TL AWD 6MT: New King
 
docboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: WA
Age: 47
Posts: 1,821
Received 165 Likes on 104 Posts
Originally Posted by maddogtheta
I just got back from Acura of Lynnwood having the CT-e axle back exhaust installed on my car (pics later today as well as a short review.). I was able to talk more to Rob about the SC. He was estimating that the SC could be installed at ~6k basing this off of the cost of previous model SC installs. They are using the AEM FIC for engine management which is able to control the AF ratio and I assume other stuff as well.

The SC'd TL wasn't available today so I wasn't able to get any pics or videos this time. I have to say that I'm very excited to see how the SC does on the 09-12 TL's. Rob says that so far the TL has been holding up very well to the boost which he said was ~6psi.
Nice. Keep us updated!

I'm curious to know if the supercharger would add any wear/tear on the tranny and clutch, or it the SC is completely irrelevant to the tranny/clutch.
docboy is offline  
Old 05-17-2011, 01:55 PM
  #301  
Drifting
iTrader: (5)
 
HeartTLs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Age: 37
Posts: 3,230
Received 416 Likes on 365 Posts
Originally Posted by maddogtheta
I just got back from Acura of Lynnwood having the CT-e axle back exhaust installed on my car (pics later today as well as a short review.). I was able to talk more to Rob about the SC. He was estimating that the SC could be installed at ~6k basing this off of the cost of previous model SC installs. They are using the AEM FIC for engine management which is able to control the AF ratio and I assume other stuff as well.

The SC'd TL wasn't available today so I wasn't able to get any pics or videos this time. I have to say that I'm very excited to see how the SC does on the 09-12 TL's. Rob says that so far the TL has been holding up very well to the boost which he said was ~6psi.
Giggling like a girl and saying excellent like Mr. Burns.
HeartTLs is offline  
Old 05-17-2011, 02:27 PM
  #302  
Chapter Leader (Southern Region)
 
Majofo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Waffles, BU
Posts: 88,888
Received 11,841 Likes on 8,573 Posts
Originally Posted by docboy
Nice. Keep us updated!

I'm curious to know if the supercharger would add any wear/tear on the tranny and clutch, or it the SC is completely irrelevant to the tranny/clutch.
Majofo is offline  
Old 05-17-2011, 03:02 PM
  #303  
2010 TL AWD 6MT: New King
 
docboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: WA
Age: 47
Posts: 1,821
Received 165 Likes on 104 Posts
Originally Posted by Majofo
Per Acura on the 4G TL 6MT:

In creating the manual transmission....the transmission would be paired with the largest and most powerful engine in Acura history, additional modifications were required to handle the increased torque output of the 3.7L engine. In addition, since the 6-speed transmission was an all-new design...The 6-speed transmission uses a heavy-duty die-cast aluminum case that houses a mainshaft that is 14-percent larger in diameter compared to the mainshaft used with the TL Type-S 6-speed manual transmission...
The gears feature improved design including being treated to glass beading and water jet blasting to smooth the outer metal surface as well as to reduce stress risers. First gear synchronizers are a triple cone design, Third and Fourth gear synchronizers feature 5.9-percent higher torque capacity, Fifth and Sixth gear synchronizers feature 9.1-percent higher torque capacity...


If Acura had to re-engineer the manual transmission to handle the torque of 3.7L engine, I find it prudent to ask what affects and wear (if any) the SC will have on the tranny if I were to spend $6k. MHO.
docboy is offline  
Old 05-17-2011, 04:17 PM
  #304  
Three Wheelin'
 
jnc2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,439
Received 114 Likes on 66 Posts
Bottom line... you gotta pay to play. The car was engineered within 80% of a theoretical limit (I'm just throwing that number out there)... if you exceed the engineered capacity of a part such as the drivetrain, clutch, axle, piston, rod etc.. you pay.

This is the big leagues boys and girls. Don't drop $6k on a SC, additional money on tuning and installation... then complain if something breaks and you don't have the money. As with anything performance related the possibility for something to go wrong IS REAL. If you can't admit that, don't buy the part - stay OEM and you'll have a nice reliable car.
jnc2000 is offline  
Old 05-17-2011, 04:26 PM
  #305  
Racer
 
maddogtheta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 43
Posts: 371
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
^ Definitely good advice, I'm definitely curious about the wear and tear aspect, I'm hopeful that running low boost and not doing constant hard starts and street racing (I never street race, I'm not about to endanger other drivers and I'm about to be dad...), the SC would not put catastrophic amounts of pressure on the wrong components. But like jnc2000 said, you have to pay to play.

I'm definitely going to keep up with Rob at Acura of Lynnwood on the condition of their prototype, apparently the person who gets to drive the car every day drives it hard.
maddogtheta is offline  
Old 05-17-2011, 04:28 PM
  #306  
Drifting
 
Pete2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Boston Metro
Age: 43
Posts: 2,761
Received 86 Likes on 66 Posts
I agree. The tranny i'm not so worried about. It'd be the clutch (i'm guessing require a stronger one, or maybe a stronger pressure plate?)

And also how strong the rear end is - if it can take the added torque.

We can check with the 3G side of things to see on the tranny/clutch stuff, but not on the rear diff.
Pete2010 is offline  
Old 05-17-2011, 04:51 PM
  #307  
Racer
 
maddogtheta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 43
Posts: 371
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Unfortunately I think that it's going to be a wait and see what happens to early adopters.

I would also think that restricting the amount of hard starts from a stop and heavy racing (on a track) would help to keep any damage from being catastrophic. I wonder if there's a better rear diff fluid that could be used to help control heat and friction?

The guys at Acura of Lynnwood didn't seem to worried about it when I was asking about any possible weak points that would need to be addressed. Of course I am by no trying to put words in their mouths or claim exactly what they said, just my perception from the conversation.
maddogtheta is offline  
Old 05-17-2011, 08:42 PM
  #308  
an adult perspective
 
Six Shifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: York, Pa
Age: 71
Posts: 1,784
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
I don't know if anyone will consider this relevant or not, but keep this in the back of your minds ...

It was the unreliability of the CT SC - coupled with some serious problems with getting CT support when failures occurred - that caused some very mod-friendly dealerships here on the East Coast (Park Avenue in NJ and Tischer in Laurel MD to name a few) to get out of the aftermarket business all together. The SC in question was the one used in the 3.2 CL Type-S's.
Six Shifter is offline  
Old 05-17-2011, 11:01 PM
  #309  
Drifting
 
Pete2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Boston Metro
Age: 43
Posts: 2,761
Received 86 Likes on 66 Posts
Although I believe that the CT SC for the NSX didn't void the factory warranty (because it was so solid). So I think it could go either way...
Pete2010 is offline  
Old 05-19-2011, 03:48 PM
  #310  
Drifting
iTrader: (5)
 
HeartTLs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Age: 37
Posts: 3,230
Received 416 Likes on 365 Posts
How many miles have been put on the test car since the SC has been on?
HeartTLs is offline  
Old 05-20-2011, 05:49 AM
  #311  
Proud owner of a GoosedTL
 
GoosedTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Raeford, NC originally from NJ
Age: 38
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the setup for the SC can be tuned and worked out to 100% I will consider buying it. I dont know how they are treating the test vehicle but I want to say I would beat on her just a little and increase that over time. I would assume we want to identify any potential issues that can arise from daily drivers who are hard on their cars. I know I have a lead foot and I dont want to have issues that can be avoided with the right testing.
GoosedTL is offline  
Old 05-20-2011, 05:50 AM
  #312  
Proud owner of a GoosedTL
 
GoosedTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Raeford, NC originally from NJ
Age: 38
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh and one more thing for 6,000 I need more of an increase than that. So when this baby hits its potential like I said I will strongly consider it!
GoosedTL is offline  
Old 05-20-2011, 02:47 PM
  #313  
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
rob_acuraoflynnwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle
Posts: 303
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by HeartTLs
How many miles have been put on the test car since the SC has been on?
We got the car with 120 miles on it. We have put on about 800 more. We should have several thousand by the time this kit hits the streets.
rob_acuraoflynnwood is offline  
Old 05-20-2011, 03:04 PM
  #314  
Drifting
iTrader: (5)
 
HeartTLs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Age: 37
Posts: 3,230
Received 416 Likes on 365 Posts
I don't want to come off as having a negative demeanor as I'm already crazy about the possibility of a SCer, but is there anyway we can safely up the power to more than 90 whp to better justify this?

Last edited by HeartTLs; 05-20-2011 at 03:15 PM.
HeartTLs is offline  
Old 05-20-2011, 03:19 PM
  #315  
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
rob_acuraoflynnwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle
Posts: 303
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by HeartTLs
I don't want to come off as having a negative demeanor as I'm already crazy about the possibility of a SCer, but is there anyway we can safely up the power to more than 90 whp to better justify this?
As I didn't make this kit you are not hurting my feelings with these questions.

With that said. This is one of the highest producing kits that CT-E has made to date. It made this car what it should be like from the factory. Plus remember that this is a bolt-on kit that should be as reliable as factory. I don't know that you would be able to go much more on stock internals but time will tell. Someone will always try to push the limits (maybe us )
rob_acuraoflynnwood is offline  
Old 05-20-2011, 03:21 PM
  #316  
Drifting
 
Pete2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Boston Metro
Age: 43
Posts: 2,761
Received 86 Likes on 66 Posts
Any chance of some more pics or vids? I'm dying to see/hear this thing.
Pete2010 is offline  
Old 05-20-2011, 03:29 PM
  #317  
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
rob_acuraoflynnwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle
Posts: 303
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by BLACKURA_NY
Any update? Dying to see this....
Sorry we have not taken the car to our local dyno yet. And still haven't gotten a better pic than the one my cell phone. We have it set for next week.
rob_acuraoflynnwood is offline  
Old 05-20-2011, 03:40 PM
  #318  
Racer
 
FallenTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 310 CA
Age: 41
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
Is this going to be CA legal? I know with superchargers, chances are that they meet CARB standards is nominally high. Just wanted to make sure. Thanks!

-DeL
FallenTSX is offline  
Old 05-20-2011, 03:41 PM
  #319  
Racer
 
maddogtheta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 43
Posts: 371
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
I'm definitely interested to see the numbers. I'm more interested in getting a supercharger in my TL...
maddogtheta is offline  
Old 05-20-2011, 03:44 PM
  #320  
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
rob_acuraoflynnwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle
Posts: 303
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by FallenTSX
Is this going to be CA legal? I know with superchargers, chances are that they meet CARB standards is nominally high. Just wanted to make sure. Thanks!

-DeL
To date all the CT-E superchargers in stock boost form have been CARB Legal.
rob_acuraoflynnwood is offline  


Quick Reply: Supercharged 2010 TL-SH-AWD 6-speed



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:36 AM.