NYC Autoshow - 2016 Tucson and Sorento take-aways

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-03-2017, 01:53 PM
  #81  
Burning Brakes
 
musty hustla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 985
Received 101 Likes on 88 Posts
I think the Tuscon and Sorento are nice vehicles. Here is my flawed problem with buying one: I can get the cheapest Tuscon for $19K or I can get the loaded version for $35K. If I get the loaded version, I feel like I've paid an additional $16K on a vehicle that was engineered to sell for $19K.

Last edited by musty hustla; 02-03-2017 at 01:57 PM.
Old 02-03-2017, 03:18 PM
  #82  
Team Owner
 
TacoBello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: In an igloo
Posts: 30,487
Received 4,416 Likes on 3,322 Posts
How isn't that true about every car?

you can buy a base 370z for 25k. You can get a loaded Nismo for 20k more.

I assure you the base and Nismo are two very different beasts.

I can give you 100 more examples, if you'd like. I'd say the sorento was designed at the midway point, with features either added or removed, as opposed to being a base with a ton of features added.

Either way, what does it matter? I highly suggest you take a look at one up close... You might change your opinion!

Last edited by TacoBello; 02-03-2017 at 03:21 PM.
The following users liked this post:
RDX10 (02-03-2017)
Old 02-03-2017, 03:21 PM
  #83  
Team Owner
 
TacoBello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: In an igloo
Posts: 30,487
Received 4,416 Likes on 3,322 Posts
Originally Posted by BLEXV6
Okay, and I am sure you are dissatisfied. Just backing up my statement. If I had had another car with a tranny problem, I may have been of the same opinion. I don't think Kia or Hyundai's are a bad choice. As I said earlier, my good friend just got a 2017 Sportage. Very nice car. I still would buy a CRV first, if I was buying in that class and as long as I can afford it, the RDX.
you're quite literally paying more for less. But if that's your shtick...

what does the RDX have, that the competition doesn't?
The following users liked this post:
RDX10 (02-03-2017)
Old 02-03-2017, 04:24 PM
  #84  
Suzuka Master
 
RDX10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,345
Received 869 Likes on 665 Posts
Originally Posted by TacoBello
How isn't that true about every car?

you can buy a base 370z for 25k. You can get a loaded Nismo for 20k more.

I assure you the base and Nismo are two very different beasts.

I can give you 100 more examples, if you'd like. I'd say the sorento was designed at the midway point, with features either added or removed, as opposed to being a base with a ton of features added.

Either way, what does it matter? I highly suggest you take a look at one up close... You might change your opinion!
Seriously! That is the most absurd argument I have heard today and I have read some things said by saintor (that says A LOT). What is the difference between a 50k mdx and a 70K mdx when for 70k the competition have a MUCH MUCH MUCH higher quality interior?

Not just that, the interior in the tucson specifically is not the same in the base and the top model. The base model has harder plastics whereas the top model has a really nice interior with good use of soft touch materials and exclusive features. The Sorento's interior is WAY higher quality than that of the MDX. Like it's not even close. Like Adam was saying, the Sorento was built to a higher price point and then decontented in order to lower the price. Even at 48k for the SXL it is a an absolute bargain when compared to other 3 row crossovers. The fact the sorento has features not even available on the MDX is embarrassing.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rockyboy
2G RDX (2013-2018)
20
10-02-2015 10:45 PM
chiu0nthls
3G MDX (2014-2020)
3
09-28-2015 03:46 AM
ceb
ILX
2
09-27-2015 10:56 AM
95oRANGEcRUSH
Car Talk
35
09-25-2015 12:50 PM
maharajamd
Console & Computer Gaming
0
09-24-2015 03:31 PM



Quick Reply: NYC Autoshow - 2016 Tucson and Sorento take-aways



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 AM.