Why is it that Infiniti is often put on a higher pedestal than Acura?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-23-2014, 07:39 AM
  #281  
Pro
 
graphicguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 583
Received 181 Likes on 73 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr Hyde
So a 535 is not a luxury sedan, but a 550,and M5 are.
These are interesting distinctions, but while not clearly defined by anyone, you obviously have your own arbitrary scale that no one else is privy to.



Price alone does not make a luxury vehicle. You were the one making it seem so cut, and dry, I was the one saying its more complicated than just 2 classes of luxury or economy.

I wont bother with the example of street legal track cars which will sell in very limited numbers as an example of anything we have been discussing regarding mainstream sedans.



I don't think all vehicles can be so cleanly divided amongst just 3 categories either. A Chevy Suburban can easily sell for more than a 5 series with a V8, so there goes your classification system.

With your posts in this thread, and such cut, and dry delineations, are you sure you aren't in marketing?

Back to my original point, if you want a good example of an economy car, head over to a rental agency, and ask for one. Just to warn you, you won't be getting the keys to a car with HID's, power everything, etc like a TSX, or even an Accord.

Javing rented a lot of cars since I travel for work, you're right. Sometimes, when I want to splurge, I rent the so called Prestige collection from Hertz. I rent so much, they sometimes upgrade me for no charge.

Those are the Volvos, the Mercedes, the Lincolns, etc. Even there, especially the Benz's, they are base cars that in all honesty, I'd prefer drivng an Accord. The last one I rented was a CLA. Suspension was terrible, crashing over pavement. Engine was underpowered. And, cost cutting was evident. Pretty car, though.

BTW, Honda and Acura don't do fleet deals with the rental agencies like all of the other manufacturers. That's why you won't see them at your rental lot.

Which gets us back to the previous poster. Some will like the Q50's styling, and no matter what it's foibles, will pony up the money for it. A couple of test drives is all it took for me to realize it's foibles (electronics, steering, etc) would have me looking to trade it in short order, once I was forced to live with it day-to-day.

Someone else mentioned the G. Truthfully, for the money they're selling them for, even with the antiquated electronics and spotty interior materials, I'd spend $30K on one of those before I would a Camry, Fusion or something in that price point.
Old 10-23-2014, 08:28 AM
  #282  
Burning Brakes
 
g37guy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Where the Sopranos and Saguaros are
Posts: 927
Received 63 Likes on 56 Posts
Originally Posted by graphicguy
Javing rented a lot of cars since I travel for work, you're right. Sometimes, when I want to splurge, I rent the so called Prestige collection from Hertz. I rent so much, they sometimes upgrade me for no charge. Those are the Volvos, the Mercedes, the Lincolns, etc. Even there, especially the Benz's, they are base cars that in all honesty, I'd prefer drivng an Accord. The last one I rented was a CLA. Suspension was terrible, crashing over pavement. Engine was underpowered. And, cost cutting was evident. Pretty car, though. BTW, Honda and Acura don't do fleet deals with the rental agencies like all of the other manufacturers. That's why you won't see them at your rental lot. Which gets us back to the previous poster. Some will like the Q50's styling, and no matter what it's foibles, will pony up the money for it. A couple of test drives is all it took for me to realize it's foibles (electronics, steering, etc) would have me looking to trade it in short order, once I was forced to live with it day-to-day. Someone else mentioned the G. Truthfully, for the money they're selling them for, even with the antiquated electronics and spotty interior materials, I'd spend $30K on one of those before I would a Camry, Fusion or something in that price point.
See that's the thing, saying on an Internet forum the electronics are antiquated and the interior has sporty materials does not make the car undesirable. And if one looks elsewhere (meaning Infiniti enthusiast sites) many like the way the electric steering can be dialed in.

This is an easy choice for me, I like the way the infinitis drive, I'll take how the car drives over a better radio any day. Too bad the tlx came out just after I picked up my car, I would have liked to test drive it. However the sage advice of many here is taken; stay away from first year models.
Old 10-23-2014, 08:54 AM
  #283  
CBP TLX
 
CybrRdr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 513
Received 44 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by Colin
I think the odds are good that the TLX will reverse that trend. TL and G have often swapped places (sales volume) depending on who is newer in the cycle.
Agreed. Initial TLX sales are very promising.
Based of the sales data for Sept 2014 sales
TLX - 3,884
Q50 - 2,742
Old 10-23-2014, 09:49 AM
  #284  
Banned
 
saturno_v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 0
Received 198 Likes on 147 Posts
Which gets us back to the previous poster. Some will like the Q50's styling, and no matter what it's foibles, will pony up the money for it. A couple of test drives is all it took for me to realize it's foibles (electronics, steering, etc) would have me looking to trade it in short order, once I was forced to live with it day-to-day.

Few things....today my wife's Q50 is going for service, the letter from Infiniti says "a system software upgrade to improve the InTouch system stability and add functionality" so the "slow" system issues could be resolved...not that the occasional few seconds lag is that big of a deal.

The Dry-By-Wire steering takes time to get used so an occasional road test may not fully reveal its advantages (I'm talking about the testers from the press)

It is actually a great feature and you can really fine tune the steering characteristics to your own liking way better than any traditional steering rack, I do like it a lot but I realize even few hours of driving time may not be enough to appreciate it.
Old 10-23-2014, 11:39 AM
  #285  
Suzuka Master
 
KeithL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 63
Posts: 5,172
Received 740 Likes on 435 Posts
Originally Posted by graphicguy
The milano leather in Acuras is nicer than in any Infiniti I've been in.
I would put my 11 M37S up against my 09 AWD TL leather any day, I think they were both great, I would give the slight edge to the Infiniti. Unless you get the touring package on a M37/Q70 you do not get the better leather and I have yet to be in a G or Q50 that had great leather. Can not speak to their higher end SUVs.
Old 10-23-2014, 11:43 AM
  #286  
Suzuka Master
 
KeithL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 63
Posts: 5,172
Received 740 Likes on 435 Posts
Originally Posted by saturno_v
The ELS audio system is incredible, better than the Infiniti Bose Studio on Wheels which by the way is not bad at all per se.....it's just that the ELS is such a good system.
The Bose SOW and Bose in Infiniti sucks in general. Not bad, but worse than most of the competition. Even the Bose in my A6 has cleaner deeper tones than the 5.1 Bose in my M37S. Infiniti needs to get a better line of audio systems in their cars.
Old 10-23-2014, 12:45 PM
  #287  
Burning Brakes
 
g37guy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Where the Sopranos and Saguaros are
Posts: 927
Received 63 Likes on 56 Posts
Originally Posted by KeithL
The Bose SOW and Bose in Infiniti sucks in general. Not bad, but worse than most of the competition. Even the Bose in my A6 has cleaner deeper tones than the 5.1 Bose in my M37S. Infiniti needs to get a better line of audio systems in their cars.
It is okay and is not on the list of negative showstoppers for the vehicle.
Old 10-23-2014, 12:54 PM
  #288  
Burning Brakes
 
g37guy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Where the Sopranos and Saguaros are
Posts: 927
Received 63 Likes on 56 Posts
Originally Posted by CybrRdr
Agreed. Initial TLX sales are very promising. Based of the sales data for Sept 2014 sales TLX - 3,884 Q50 - 2,742
Or for ytd figures g+q is 37k. Tlx+tl is 14k. We shall see how the momentum carries.
Old 10-23-2014, 01:45 PM
  #289  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr Hyde
Back to my original point, if you want a good example of an economy car, head over to a rental agency, and ask for one. Just to warn you, you won't be getting the keys to a car with HID's, power everything, etc like a TSX, or even an Accord.
Will not bother with the whole post just your last point which I guess is to prove your points.

Get a free loaner from Lieth BMW & the guy from National Car Rental will bring a nice very low mileage 328 to the Servi e Departments Door. LEITH one of the two largest BMW dealers in thr Carolinas also sells MB, Lexus, Acura Chevy ETC.
Old 10-23-2014, 05:26 PM
  #290  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
ScottLong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory
Will not bother with the whole post just your last point which I guess is to prove your points.

Get a free loaner from Lieth BMW & the guy from National Car Rental will bring a nice very low mileage 328 to the Servi e Departments Door. LEITH one of the two largest BMW dealers in thr Carolinas also sells MB, Lexus, Acura Chevy ETC.
What the hell are you talking about? I'm confused by like half your posts.
You said the TSX is a economy car, numerous other posters have said that it's not. His point is that the TSX is not a economy car. It's above that.

What the hell does Lieth or 328 loaners have to do with anything.

Get out of your bubble. The TSX is NOT an economy car. A economy car is something like a Mazda 3 or Toyota Corolla.
Old 10-23-2014, 05:28 PM
  #291  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
ScottLong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 14 Posts
Also nobody care about your standards and definitions of 'economy cars' and 'luxury cars'. Nobody. The Auto Industry determines that and we go by it. You want to be a rebel and throw a big middle finger against the Auto Industry. Scream that a fully loaded Fusion is the same as a Mercedes CLA? Car forum people might actually agree. But you know what? The general American Public don't. And they speak with their wallets.
Old 10-23-2014, 07:07 PM
  #292  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by g37guy01
Or for ytd figures g+q is 37k. Tlx+tl is 14k. We shall see how the momentum carries.
Yes, as I said, depending on cycles, there will be highs and lows for these two vs. eachother. Considering that the TL was in 'lame duck' mode for almost a year as Acura prolonged the launch of TLX and considering that TL + TSX production lines were closed in Dec/Jan there were few TLs to sell even if you had a customer looking to snap up one of the old models.
Old 10-23-2014, 08:17 PM
  #293  
Senior Moderator
 
Mr Hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Age: 47
Posts: 5,461
Received 616 Likes on 294 Posts
Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory
loaner from Lieth BMW & the guy from National Car Rental will bring a nice very low mileage 328
So you bring in your BMW for service, and you leave in a BMW? Um ok I guess??? I'm lost on the relevance.
Old 10-23-2014, 08:54 PM
  #294  
Drifting
 
Rocketsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,606
Received 535 Likes on 301 Posts
Originally Posted by saturno_v
Few things....today my wife's Q50 is going for service, the letter from Infiniti says "a system software upgrade to improve the InTouch system stability and add functionality" so the "slow" system issues could be resolved...not that the occasional few seconds lag is that big of a deal.

The Dry-By-Wire steering takes time to get used so an occasional road test may not fully reveal its advantages (I'm talking about the testers from the press)

It is actually a great feature and you can really fine tune the steering characteristics to your own liking way better than any traditional steering rack, I do like it a lot but I realize even few hours of driving time may not be enough to appreciate it.
I just recently stopped following the Q50 forums since I got my TLX. The Q50 was just about to be the car I was going to get until the maniacal Intouch electronic glitches where you had to pull over and restart your car or, if you were lucky, just restart your InTouch system, missing apps on the Intouch, backup lines that don't show up for 30 seconds or so on the display when you put the car in reverse, people holding the steering wheel sideways to make it go straight, smelly interior, etc. pissed me off and I didn't even own the car. lol. That's when I just decided to wait on the TLX (after also having given up on the ATS).

In fairness to the Q50, I believe 95% of the issues they had have been fixed or don't show up anymore (again, I haven't followed the car in about a month or two). If the Q50 had been released without all the issues they had, I may have chosent it over the TLX, but "first impressions..." and all that.
Old 10-23-2014, 09:14 PM
  #295  
AZ Community Team
 
Tony Pac's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 3,405
Received 1,582 Likes on 952 Posts
Originally Posted by CybrRdr
Agreed. Initial TLX sales are very promising.
Based of the sales data for Sept 2014 sales
TLX - 3,884
Q50 - 2,742
This is without AWD...wait for SH-AWD and the sales will be around 5K units for sure.

TLX will sale more than Q50 for sure. There is no doubt. The price range of too good...it fits everyone's budget. Q50 doesn't fit everyone's budget.
Old 10-23-2014, 10:02 PM
  #296  
Banned
 
saturno_v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 0
Received 198 Likes on 147 Posts
Originally Posted by Rocketsfan
I just recently stopped following the Q50 forums since I got my TLX. The Q50 was just about to be the car I was going to get until the maniacal Intouch electronic glitches where you had to pull over and restart your car or, if you were lucky, just restart your InTouch system, missing apps on the Intouch, backup lines that don't show up for 30 seconds or so on the display when you put the car in reverse, people holding the steering wheel sideways to make it go straight, smelly interior, etc. pissed me off and I didn't even own the car. lol. That's when I just decided to wait on the TLX (after also having given up on the ATS).

In fairness to the Q50, I believe 95% of the issues they had have been fixed or don't show up anymore (again, I haven't followed the car in about a month or two). If the Q50 had been released without all the issues they had, I may have chosent it over the TLX, but "first impressions..." and all that.

Well I never had the sort of issues you did described but I admit the InTouch could have few seconds of "thinking" here and there.

I got the car back tonight after the system update service and I can definitely see a big improvement...system response is way crispier, very "fluid" and boot time is slightly better.
Old 10-23-2014, 10:10 PM
  #297  
Racer
 
atsx1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 34
Posts: 422
Received 21 Likes on 20 Posts
yea, it has rwd and more power...

that equals more gas... i would be practical and buy acura over infiniti.
besides, i hate nissan, had two nissan before buying the car of my dream (realistically) and got tsx.
Old 10-24-2014, 12:11 AM
  #298  
Burning Brakes
 
g37guy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Where the Sopranos and Saguaros are
Posts: 927
Received 63 Likes on 56 Posts
Originally Posted by dwk331
yea, it has rwd and more power... that equals more gas... i would be practical and buy acura over infiniti. besides, i hate nissan, had two nissan before buying the car of my dream (realistically) and got tsx.
If I cared about gas I would buy a prius or tesla. I'm not looking for absolute practicality I want a drivers car.
Old 10-24-2014, 12:13 AM
  #299  
Burning Brakes
 
g37guy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Where the Sopranos and Saguaros are
Posts: 927
Received 63 Likes on 56 Posts
Originally Posted by Tony Pac
This is without AWD...wait for SH-AWD and the sales will be around 5K units for sure. TLX will sale more than Q50 for sure. There is no doubt. The price range of too good...it fits everyone's budget. Q50 doesn't fit everyone's budget.
Maybe, maybe not. But Infiniti is not standing still either.
Old 10-24-2014, 01:59 AM
  #300  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
ScottLong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by g37guy01
Maybe, maybe not. But Infiniti is not standing still either.
Infiniti cars are great. They really are. But like someone said, Infiniti trying to sell at the same price point as Lexus and in the same bracket as the Germans is just not going to work.

The reason the Q50 isn't selling as much is not because it's not a great car, it's because for that money a lot of consumers will rather go the Lexus or BMW route.

The Q50 is obviously a great car and I actually think it's better than every car in it's segment outside of the IS 350 F Sport. But Infiniti really messed up by not introducing a 33,000 MSRP USD version as well as the current one.

A weaker Q50 sellling for around 33-34k MSRP will be a lot more attractive than a TLX I4, the problem is that car does not exist.
The following users liked this post:
hadokenuh (10-28-2014)
Old 10-24-2014, 02:05 AM
  #301  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
ScottLong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 14 Posts
Despite this being an Acura forum, I think a lot of people under estimate Acura's perception in the real World. I stayed in Texas during the Summer and the overall opinion/vibe I got from the people there is that Acura is still perceived as the higher end Brand compared to say Buick.

I don't even think the issue with Acura is FWD. The Lexus ES is FWD and it's constantly being ranked high and it's always selling great numbers. The problem with Acura is that it tries to pass itself off as sporty luxury IN A FWD Package. That doesn't work.

The ES never tried the sporty route. It's simply a entry level luxury family sedan and it's always marketed as such. The 'sporty' Lexus cars are all RWD.

Acura should probably have followed that route.

FWD-TL for the Family Luxury and maybe RWD Version for the younger people.
Old 10-24-2014, 06:50 AM
  #302  
Burning Brakes
 
g37guy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Where the Sopranos and Saguaros are
Posts: 927
Received 63 Likes on 56 Posts
Originally Posted by ScottLong
Infiniti cars are great. They really are. But like someone said, Infiniti trying to sell at the same price point as Lexus and in the same bracket as the Germans is just not going to work. The reason the Q50 isn't selling as much is not because it's not a great car, it's because for that money a lot of consumers will rather go the Lexus or BMW route. The Q50 is obviously a great car and I actually think it's better than every car in it's segment outside of the IS 350 F Sport. But Infiniti really messed up by not introducing a 33,000 MSRP USD version as well as the current one. A weaker Q50 sellling for around 33-34k MSRP will be a lot more attractive than a TLX I4, the problem is that car does not exist.
They brought back the g as another q model. Nomenclature escapes me. I'm wondering how it is going to go. Q50 will be more upscale.
Old 10-24-2014, 07:29 AM
  #303  
Racer
 
wlkeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: So California
Posts: 433
Received 115 Likes on 76 Posts
New nomenclature for G37 is Q40.
Old 10-24-2014, 10:41 AM
  #304  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr Hyde
So you bring in your BMW for service, and you leave in a BMW? Um ok I guess??? I'm lost on the relevance.
Thats easy. You said IIRC that 328's are not rental cars, but the thing is National is a rental car company & if some one for whatever reason wanted one they could rent it from National.

Ergo 328's are part of the rental fleet.

That said if you want cars like the TSX & ILX to be something special, Enjoy!!
Old 10-24-2014, 10:48 AM
  #305  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by ScottLong
Also nobody care about your standards and definitions of 'economy cars' and 'luxury cars'. NOBODY.
Then don't get yourself all worked up over my definations.

Last edited by BEAR-AvHistory; 10-24-2014 at 10:50 AM.
Old 10-24-2014, 10:56 AM
  #306  
AZ Community Team
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 17,801
Received 4,031 Likes on 2,507 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr Hyde
So a 535 is not a luxury sedan, but a 550,and M5 are.
These are interesting distinctions, but while not clearly defined by anyone, you obviously have your own arbitrary scale that no one else is privy to.



Price alone does not make a luxury vehicle. You were the one making it seem so cut, and dry, I was the one saying its more complicated than just 2 classes of luxury or economy.

I wont bother with the example of street legal track cars which will sell in very limited numbers as an example of anything we have been discussing regarding mainstream sedans.



I don't think all vehicles can be so cleanly divided amongst just 3 categories either. A Chevy Suburban can easily sell for more than a 5 series with a V8, so there goes your classification system.

With your posts in this thread, and such cut, and dry delineations, are you sure you aren't in marketing?

Back to my original point, if you want a good example of an economy car, head over to a rental agency, and ask for one. Just to warn you, you won't be getting the keys to a car with HID's, power everything, etc like a TSX, or even an Accord.
To simple classify a 5 series a luxury car only if it has a V8 is silly and pointless.
Reminds me of when the US Government decided a 2 door SUV was a truck but a 4 door of the same model was a car. The distinctions between vehicles and their classes is gray and blurry at best these days.
Old 10-24-2014, 11:04 AM
  #307  
Senior Moderator
 
Mr Hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Age: 47
Posts: 5,461
Received 616 Likes on 294 Posts
Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory
Thats easy. You said IIRC that 328's are not rental cars..............That said if you want cars like the TSX & ILX to be something special, Enjoy!!
Your recollection is completely wrong, and unnecessary since you quoted me only inches above. You can even rent exotics if you want, you just need to have deep enough pockets.

I said to ask for an economy car at a rental agency, and see what you get. You mentioned National, so here you go. https://www.nationalcar.com/index.do...withnav-header

Even taking their lowest tier vehicles, Chevy Sparks, Versas, Corollas are all a long way off from a TSX, let alone a 328.

I also said nothing about the TSX or ILX being special. I just completely disagree with your classification of them as economy cars.

If it makes you feel better to put them down in that manner, Enjoy!!

Last edited by Mr Hyde; 10-24-2014 at 11:08 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Stew4HD (10-27-2014)
Old 10-28-2014, 12:12 PM
  #308  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr Hyde
Your recollection is completely wrong, and unnecessary since you quoted me only inches above. You can even rent exotics if you want, you just need to have deep enough pockets.

I said to ask for an economy car at a rental agency, and see what you get. You mentioned National, so here you go. https://www.nationalcar.com/index.do...withnav-header

Even taking their lowest tier vehicles, Chevy Sparks, Versas, Corollas are all a long way off from a TSX, let alone a 328.

I also said nothing about the TSX or ILX being special. I just completely disagree with your classification of them as economy cars.

If it makes you feel better to put them down in that manner, Enjoy!!
Not putting them down just disagreeing with you about their overall standing from my point of view. Don't consider any of mine luxury cars either.

Had cars like the Jaguar 4.0 Sovereign V8 & MB-S class when I lived in the UK & consider them luxury cars. We were giving section supervisors 3 & C series cars so that is my frame of reference.

Your results may differ.
Old 10-28-2014, 01:07 PM
  #309  
Suzuka Master
 
usdmJON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,511
Received 849 Likes on 679 Posts
Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory
That said if you want cars like the TSX & ILX to be something special, Enjoy!!

Pssssh. My bitch be sexy.
Old 10-28-2014, 01:53 PM
  #310  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Hey what can I tell you? Was the R&T sibling compare that picked the Civic over the ILX not me. The Civic was quicker, stopped better & handled better.

Acura ILX vs. Honda Civic Si - Comparison Tests - Road & Track
Old 10-28-2014, 01:59 PM
  #311  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
ggesq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 12,452
Received 2,181 Likes on 1,210 Posts
Tires...
Old 10-28-2014, 02:23 PM
  #312  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Tires would help the ILX toward evening the gap to the factory equipped Civic but the Civic still has LSD, better roll bars etc. that you can't get on the ILX.

Regardless R&T is still calling it for the Civic. Maybe they think the $8000 extra does not cover the spread in content. As I said I did not make the call R&T did so post a letter to the ED.

Last edited by BEAR-AvHistory; 10-28-2014 at 02:26 PM.
Old 10-28-2014, 03:08 PM
  #313  
Some dude
 
MeehowsBRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,605
Received 347 Likes on 203 Posts
Originally Posted by DEman19901
Brand specific platforms and RWD. My 2 cents.
Should have just locked this thread up after this post.


Originally Posted by ScottLong
Despite this being an Acura forum, I think a lot of people under estimate Acura's perception in the real World. I stayed in Texas during the Summer and the overall opinion/vibe I got from the people there is that Acura is still perceived as the higher end Brand compared to say Buick.
lol, I really doubt that should be taken as something to be proud of.
Old 10-28-2014, 07:13 PM
  #314  
Senior Moderator
 
Mr Hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Age: 47
Posts: 5,461
Received 616 Likes on 294 Posts
Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory
Not putting them down just disagreeing with you about their overall standing from my point of view. Don't consider any of mine luxury cars either.

Had cars like the Jaguar 4.0 Sovereign V8 & MB-S class when I lived in the UK & consider them luxury cars.
I'm glad you said it's in your point of view, as your personal classification system is obviously at odds with everyone on this forum, all the magazine's, reviews, manufacturers, etc, etc.
Old 10-29-2014, 11:40 AM
  #315  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr Hyde
I'm glad you said it's in your point of view, as your personal classification system is obviously at odds with everyone on this forum, all the magazine's, reviews, manufacturers, etc, etc.
Thinking outside the box has done me very well over my lifetime, no reason to change now. If car companies who sell cars for six figure prices want to tell the public their $35K entry is a luxury car & people are anxious to accept it at face value who am I to stand in the way of very good marketing.
The following users liked this post:
Monte TLS,MAX (10-30-2014)
Old 10-29-2014, 11:51 AM
  #316  
Senior Moderator
 
Mr Hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Age: 47
Posts: 5,461
Received 616 Likes on 294 Posts
Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory
Thinking outside the box has done me very well over my lifetime, no reason to change now. If car companies who sell cars for six figure prices want to tell the public their $35K entry is a luxury car & people are anxious to accept it at face value who am I to stand in the way of very good marketing.
Good for you. you are obviously not in the car industry as your marketing strategy, and classifcation system would have bankrupted any company several times over.
Old 10-29-2014, 01:12 PM
  #317  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr Hyde
Good for you. you are obviously not in the car industry as your marketing strategy, and classifcation system would have bankrupted any company several times over.
Well the next company I bankrupt will be the first one I bankrupt. Have a good track record in the real world & am not worried about it.

I did not say it was not a good strategy on the contrary the more people they can suck into higher priced offerings with marketing manufactured categories, labels & tag lines the better for profits.

Look how hard people will defend their "luxury" auto purchases. Something that never comes up at the top end because they are luxury cars with no equivocation. Question might be asked where is the lower cutoff. Can a TLX be a luxury car & a Buick not?

Not much has changed in auto marketing, the direct descendent of horse trading, since Henry Ford got the mass market rolling.

GM was founded on the concept of get them in young with a Chevy & grow them through the product line into a Caddy as they matured & their income increased. What's good for GM is good for the country.
Old 10-29-2014, 01:57 PM
  #318  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
ScottLong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory
Well the next company I bankrupt will be the first one I bankrupt. Have a good track record in the real world & am not worried about it.

I did not say it was not a good strategy on the contrary the more people they can suck into higher priced offerings with marketing manufactured categories, labels & tag lines the better for profits.

Look how hard people will defend their "luxury" auto purchases. Something that never comes up at the top end because they are luxury cars with no equivocation. Question might be asked where is the lower cutoff. Can a TLX be a luxury car & a Buick not?

Not much has changed in auto marketing, the direct descendent of horse trading, since Henry Ford got the mass market rolling.

GM was founded on the concept of get them in young with a Chevy & grow them through the product line into a Caddy as they matured & their income increased. What's good for GM is good for the country.

I'm going to try to say this without sounding too offensive. The truth of the matter is your opinion does not matter. Because you are going against the opinions of the Auto Industry and millions of buyers. It doesn't matter how successful you are in real life. My Dad is a very successful person, nobody will care one bit if he started screaming that 'A BMW 328I IS NOT CONSIDERED A LUXURY CAR'. Nobody will care. He can drive up to the local BMW Dealership in his Bentley and start showing people proof that 'the 328i is not luxury'. People will just laugh at him(and laugh at you).

The Auto Industry and the consumers control what is viewed as luxury and what is not viewed as luxury. Not some poster on Acurazine.

This is just like me writing up a 200 page report on why Muhammad Ali is not a top 10 Heavyweight. I can use all sorts of stats and theories and maybe I'll actually be right. Maybe Muhammad Ali really ISN'T a top 10 All Time Heavyweight. But the BOXING WORLD and the sports world will just laugh me out of the park. It doesn't matter if it's true or not.

Maybe Ali isn't as good as everyone thinks. The fact that everyone thinks he's just that good makes the 'truth' irrelevant.
Old 10-29-2014, 02:00 PM
  #319  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
ScottLong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 14 Posts
Sorry to bust your bubble BEAR. But driving a little BMW 4 series or whatever it is that you drive doesn't make a bit of difference to the average American person. They see your car and they see a 3 Series. They think 'BMW'. Sorry. They don't say to themselves 'hmm let's see, this guy got a M SPORT PACKAGE and that means ........ or this guy's 435 is OBVIOUSLY this much faster than a 428i by torque x CURB WEIGHT' Lol. No. What they see is a BMW and that's that.
Old 10-29-2014, 02:01 PM
  #320  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
ScottLong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 14 Posts
Also why do you keep bragging about how successful you are in real life? You want to do that?

Body Building Misc is a good place. I got an account there. Join me.


Quick Reply: Why is it that Infiniti is often put on a higher pedestal than Acura?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06 PM.