Oct Sales numbers -

Old 12-05-2016, 09:29 AM
  #81  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
ggesq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 12,452
Received 2,181 Likes on 1,210 Posts
I really like the way the C class looks but abhore the stick on IPad that sits ackwardly on the dash like it is an afterthought. Very much prefer BMW's and Audi's integration over MB.
Old 12-05-2016, 10:55 AM
  #82  
JT4
CTSV,TL, Audi Q7 & A5SB
 
JT4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NYC / LI
Age: 57
Posts: 2,082
Received 599 Likes on 454 Posts
Originally Posted by ggesq
I really like the way the C class looks but abhore the stick on IPad that sits ackwardly on the dash like it is an afterthought. Very much prefer BMW's and Audi's integration over MB.
I agree, I think the C class looks great, but that iPad looking screen really looks terrible in pics, and IMO even worse in person.
Old 12-05-2016, 03:56 PM
  #83  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,492
Received 834 Likes on 518 Posts
Originally Posted by CaliAtenza
My sister has a 2016 C300 and it's actually kinda meh. I much prefer my TLX to it.
Interesting. Just wondering which part(s) did you find that it's kinda meh?

Admittedly, I hated its rear end design initially, but it grew on me. And the interior looks even better than Audi interior, which is already highly rated.
Old 12-05-2016, 06:25 PM
  #84  
Suzuka Master
 
weather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,204
Received 1,267 Likes on 864 Posts
^^ the sloping/drooping rear end is one part of the C class I can't seem to overlook. I am not a huge fan of the stick on i-pad look but it is not as offensive as the rear end (viewed sideways) for me.
Old 12-05-2016, 06:43 PM
  #85  
Suzuka Master
 
KeithL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 63
Posts: 5,172
Received 740 Likes on 435 Posts
Originally Posted by ggesq
I really like the way the C class looks but abhore the stick on IPad that sits ackwardly on the dash like it is an afterthought. Very much prefer BMW's and Audi's integration over MB.
more and more of these past d on Garmin looking screens are showing up on cars to get the screen close to line of sight, they just do horrible job of making it look like it was not an after thought.
Old 12-06-2016, 07:11 AM
  #86  
Racer
 
wlkeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: So California
Posts: 433
Received 115 Likes on 76 Posts
Agree. I love Mazdas (have a 2011 MX-5 Miata) and they've gone to this design. And I think it's a line of sight thing. Mazda has great ergonomics so I'm assuming this is the reason.

Maybe one gets used to it?
Old 12-06-2016, 12:57 PM
  #87  
Three Wheelin'
 
mapleloaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 1,494
Received 869 Likes on 413 Posts
Talking

[QUOTE=weather;15911988]^^ the sloping/drooping rear end is one part of the C class I can't seem to overlook.

You don't like that look that's reminiscent of the early 2000s Sonata or the mid 2000s Taurus? Whats wrong with you?
Old 12-06-2016, 06:17 PM
  #88  
Suzuka Master
 
weather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,204
Received 1,267 Likes on 864 Posts
^^ LMAO....Must be the wine!!

BTW...Good ol' blizzard for you guys eh!?!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gavriil
Automotive News
5747
04-07-2024 05:28 PM
TSX69
3G RLX (2013+)
1522
01-05-2021 03:18 PM
Tony Pac
5G TLX (2015-2020)
169
10-13-2016 06:52 PM
colt427
2G RDX (2013-2018)
2
07-01-2016 10:58 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Oct Sales numbers -



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 AM.