Any 6MT drivers considering current TLX?
#1
Any 6MT drivers considering current TLX?
I'm a pretty die hard manual fan, and current owner of the 4g TL 6MT; but, just for grins, I test drove a V6 Advanced TLX. I wanted to try the DCT i4, but they didn't have one at the time.
I have to say the TLX is a step-up in refinement from my 2010, mostly from the quieter interior (not with use of materials, which seems about equal). The Advanced tech provided interesting novelty, but certainly not something I can't live without. Part of the test drive was on a road that didn't have any painted lines, and the steering wheel tug (for no apparent reason) from the LCAS was a little disconcerting - I first thought something was wrong with the steering, or it was doing some major tramlining. Auto-dim side view mirrors and auto up/down on all four side windows finally brings it in line with the 2007 BMW 335i standard features I had leased and have missed on my 2010 TL. The paddle shifted 9AT still has that short delay between flicking the paddle and transmission response, which is unacceptable if I want to resort to a paddle shifted AT to replace an MT. The DCT may respond more quickly, but that with the 4 cyl would also be too much of a compromise coming from a 305hp V6 6MT.
Conclusion: I'm still holding out for an under $50K well-equipped, roomy sports sedan with MT that's NOT a BMW. I am sufficiently satisfied with my paid-off 2010 TL to wait until '16 or '17. Mid cycle Type S 6MT, if it is going to ever exist, should be out by then, or at least announced to be coming out. I know the Chevy SS sedan is supposed to get a 6MT next year (exact drive train config I would have bought in the 2010 Pontiac G8 GXP if they hadn't killed Pontiac the same year my BMW lease ran out); but, now that I know GM has direct injected V8 getting high 20s (near 30 mpg) in the C7 'vette, I'm waiting for next generation SS built on the Caddy ATS/CTS architecture and hoping for the LT1 7MT. If none of my sedan MT dreams comes to fruition, I may wind up another one those guys bragging about how I got 300,000 miles out of my 20-year old Honda clutch. ...and maybe I'll find out how many miles the SH-AWD clutch packs will last.
So, any other MT fans out there who have considered a TLX?
I have to say the TLX is a step-up in refinement from my 2010, mostly from the quieter interior (not with use of materials, which seems about equal). The Advanced tech provided interesting novelty, but certainly not something I can't live without. Part of the test drive was on a road that didn't have any painted lines, and the steering wheel tug (for no apparent reason) from the LCAS was a little disconcerting - I first thought something was wrong with the steering, or it was doing some major tramlining. Auto-dim side view mirrors and auto up/down on all four side windows finally brings it in line with the 2007 BMW 335i standard features I had leased and have missed on my 2010 TL. The paddle shifted 9AT still has that short delay between flicking the paddle and transmission response, which is unacceptable if I want to resort to a paddle shifted AT to replace an MT. The DCT may respond more quickly, but that with the 4 cyl would also be too much of a compromise coming from a 305hp V6 6MT.
Conclusion: I'm still holding out for an under $50K well-equipped, roomy sports sedan with MT that's NOT a BMW. I am sufficiently satisfied with my paid-off 2010 TL to wait until '16 or '17. Mid cycle Type S 6MT, if it is going to ever exist, should be out by then, or at least announced to be coming out. I know the Chevy SS sedan is supposed to get a 6MT next year (exact drive train config I would have bought in the 2010 Pontiac G8 GXP if they hadn't killed Pontiac the same year my BMW lease ran out); but, now that I know GM has direct injected V8 getting high 20s (near 30 mpg) in the C7 'vette, I'm waiting for next generation SS built on the Caddy ATS/CTS architecture and hoping for the LT1 7MT. If none of my sedan MT dreams comes to fruition, I may wind up another one those guys bragging about how I got 300,000 miles out of my 20-year old Honda clutch. ...and maybe I'll find out how many miles the SH-AWD clutch packs will last.
So, any other MT fans out there who have considered a TLX?
#2
Azine Jabroni
If one is an MT driver and big Acura/Honda enthusiast, they should wait for a potential model update from the big H or A unless they absolutely need a new model.
#4
man as much as i like driving manuals, if only had one car it would be an automatic. thankfully i have a weekend warrior that is a 6 speed and an automatic daily.
#5
06 TL 6MT + 18 ATS-V 8AT
iTrader: (2)
I also drive manuals exclusively (3G TL and B6 S4) and considered the TLX after seeing the prototype. But with the production version being watered down and no manual tranny available, I lost interest. Fingers crossed they'll make a hi-po TLX with one, but the lower rent interior will still take some getting used to.
Funny, I also considered the G8 GXP just before they killed it, but couldn't get over the drab interior (as old as the 3G is, its interior is still light years ahead). The SS 6MT has peaked my interest too, but will be more expensive than the GXP, whose price was already hard to swallow for a "GM" car.
As for other $40-50k 6MT midsize sedans...the B8 S4 doesn't do it for me, so I'm waiting to see how the B9 S4 unfolds. The 335i Sport is another alternative, but something about its interior still looks cheap. 435i Gran Coupe might be a stretch, as the base 428i GC is already $40k
Other wildcards: Will they offer the Q50S or S3 with 6MT? CLA45 AMG and IS350 will never get manuals because that's just how MB and Lexus roll. ATS-V maybe? Too bad the Regal GS is a 4-cyl else I'd be all over it. And the S60 polestar is ~$60k and auto-tragic only.
Funny, I also considered the G8 GXP just before they killed it, but couldn't get over the drab interior (as old as the 3G is, its interior is still light years ahead). The SS 6MT has peaked my interest too, but will be more expensive than the GXP, whose price was already hard to swallow for a "GM" car.
As for other $40-50k 6MT midsize sedans...the B8 S4 doesn't do it for me, so I'm waiting to see how the B9 S4 unfolds. The 335i Sport is another alternative, but something about its interior still looks cheap. 435i Gran Coupe might be a stretch, as the base 428i GC is already $40k
Other wildcards: Will they offer the Q50S or S3 with 6MT? CLA45 AMG and IS350 will never get manuals because that's just how MB and Lexus roll. ATS-V maybe? Too bad the Regal GS is a 4-cyl else I'd be all over it. And the S60 polestar is ~$60k and auto-tragic only.
Last edited by silverTL6; 09-01-2014 at 06:18 AM.
The following 2 users liked this post by justnspace:
d1sturb3d119 (09-01-2014),
DMZ (09-01-2014)
#7
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
^^^^^
Tell us how you really feel.
Tell us how you really feel.
Trending Topics
#9
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
^^
http://autoweek.com/article/car-news...le-stick-shift
Chevy’s only rear-wheel drive four door sedan, the SS, will be receiving several upgrades for the 2015 model year to compete with the likes of the Dodge Charger and…well, pretty much just the Dodge Charger.
Performance enhancements include the addition of Magnetic Ride control as a standard feature, as well as rear Brembo brakes to complement the already standard front Brembos. Optional for 2015 is a six-speed manual transmission that should have driving enthusiasts (us included) excited. Also optional for the coming year will be OnStar’s 4G LTE connectivity with a built in Wi-Fi hot spot so you can upload your burnout videos to Facebook straight from your car.
2014 Chevrolet SS review notesCAR REVIEWS 2014 Chevrolet SS review notesEDITOR WES RAYNAL: I have no idea if the new 2014 Chevrolet SS is a good car. I can't tell exactly how fast it is, how it handles, or how good the brakes are. Why not? Because Detroit got a couple ...
Power will still be dished out from Chevy’s 6.2-liter LS3 V8, making 415 hp and 415 lb-ft of torque. Automatic versions of the SS accelerate to 60 within 5 seconds, and Chevrolet claims that the more aggressive axle ratio (3.70) used with manual transmission models will make for even quicker times.
Five exterior colors have been added for 2015 including two different greens (Regal Peacock and Jungle Green), as well as blue, red and purple options so you can stand out from crowd.
With no release date as of yet, expect the Australian-made 2015 Chevy SS to arrive sometime later this year.
Performance enhancements include the addition of Magnetic Ride control as a standard feature, as well as rear Brembo brakes to complement the already standard front Brembos. Optional for 2015 is a six-speed manual transmission that should have driving enthusiasts (us included) excited. Also optional for the coming year will be OnStar’s 4G LTE connectivity with a built in Wi-Fi hot spot so you can upload your burnout videos to Facebook straight from your car.
2014 Chevrolet SS review notesCAR REVIEWS 2014 Chevrolet SS review notesEDITOR WES RAYNAL: I have no idea if the new 2014 Chevrolet SS is a good car. I can't tell exactly how fast it is, how it handles, or how good the brakes are. Why not? Because Detroit got a couple ...
Power will still be dished out from Chevy’s 6.2-liter LS3 V8, making 415 hp and 415 lb-ft of torque. Automatic versions of the SS accelerate to 60 within 5 seconds, and Chevrolet claims that the more aggressive axle ratio (3.70) used with manual transmission models will make for even quicker times.
Five exterior colors have been added for 2015 including two different greens (Regal Peacock and Jungle Green), as well as blue, red and purple options so you can stand out from crowd.
With no release date as of yet, expect the Australian-made 2015 Chevy SS to arrive sometime later this year.
#12
Be a better driver
iTrader: (1)
Completely agree with your statement about replacing an MT with a paddle shift AT, any delay is unacceptable. Though I've heard with Lexus' PWR mode that any delay is not noticeable in the IS350. Haven't driven one myself though. In my mind the only autos you truly won't see a delay in are twin clutches, but that means a more expensive car. Still, with paddle shift rev matching is not needed, which takes more away from the MT experience.
I was excited when I read press releases about the TLX being more geared toward sporty driving, but the resulting drivetrains don't really indicate that in my opinion. Disappointed with the looks too, to me a new Accord EX Sport or Touring looks better. The prototype looked better, especially at the rear.
I was excited when I read press releases about the TLX being more geared toward sporty driving, but the resulting drivetrains don't really indicate that in my opinion. Disappointed with the looks too, to me a new Accord EX Sport or Touring looks better. The prototype looked better, especially at the rear.
Last edited by RedRyder; 09-01-2014 at 11:37 AM.
#13
Azine Jabroni
The following users liked this post:
cbptls (09-04-2014)
#16
Azine Jabroni
#17
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
I think it's an unfair comparison.
those american monsters are awesome, if you can afford the gas and insurance.
if you cant afford the gas and insurance, you're stuck with mediocre products.
back in 2010, i got to play with a '10 Dodge Challenger SRT8 in 6MT form for a month.
awesome daily driver.
was very docile during normal commuting; step on the skinny pedal and it roared to life.
I chose my TL because its what I could afford without skimping out on what I thought was valuable.
my 2006 6MT TL is capable of beating most cars on the street.
in the end, it comes down to preference and what you personally want.
#18
I prefer manuals as you have total control over the cars gearing and no auto can do this. But it is only a good thing if the change quality and the clutch are good. The potentially better economy (gearing aside) is a bonus. The TSX has possibly the best gearchange and clutch action on any car ever made. But to move on from it (lease is expiring) means getting an Accord or an ATS if I am to stay with a manual in a sporty sedan. The ILX I do not like and the Civic Si is too boy racer. Both are unsatisfactory TSX replacements. I am considering a TLX as its 8 speed auto is so good. But I will miss rowing my own. It is criminal that the Accord sedan does not come with the V6 and a manual. Would make my decision very easy. The V6s auto has no degree of manual control at all.
#19
Audi S4 6MT AWD/eLSD 0-60=4.9s stock. It is a ripper and
looks just like a plain A4. The electric steering in the B8.5
ie 2014 model killed the fun, a used B8 can be found, do not
get one without the eLSD, it turns the rear-biased quattro
into an all weather beast, with season appropriate tires of course.
The TL was a strong competitor but non-folding rear seats
and the AWD trunk humps killing space even further took
care of that.
Here is mine:
looks just like a plain A4. The electric steering in the B8.5
ie 2014 model killed the fun, a used B8 can be found, do not
get one without the eLSD, it turns the rear-biased quattro
into an all weather beast, with season appropriate tires of course.
The TL was a strong competitor but non-folding rear seats
and the AWD trunk humps killing space even further took
care of that.
Here is mine:
Last edited by Kandiru; 09-01-2014 at 03:40 PM.
The following users liked this post:
justnspace (09-01-2014)
#20
06 TL 6MT + 18 ATS-V 8AT
iTrader: (2)
The Holden Commodore which it's based on has been available with 6MT from the beginning, it was just a matter of if and when it'd make financial sense to import it.
#21
06 TL 6MT + 18 ATS-V 8AT
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by Kandiru
Audi S4 6MT AWD/eLSD 0-60=4.9s stock. It is a ripper and
looks just like a plain A4. The electric steering in the B8.5
ie 2014 model killed the fun, a used B8 can be found, do not
get one without the eLSD, it turns the rear-biased quattro
into an all weather beast, with season appropriate tires of course.
Here is mine:
looks just like a plain A4. The electric steering in the B8.5
ie 2014 model killed the fun, a used B8 can be found, do not
get one without the eLSD, it turns the rear-biased quattro
into an all weather beast, with season appropriate tires of course.
Here is mine:
#22
I feel the need...
TLX is a step up in luxury, not so much in the sportiness dept, but I've only driven the V6 PAWS so far. Not sure what my next car will be, but hopefully Ken is on the money with a TYPE-S manual prediction.
#23
Three Wheelin'
Considered, yes.
Getting one? Nope. It would be a step down from my 7 year old type s. Maybe when and if they release a true sports version.
And why is the TLX here in the forums as a 5th Gen TL? It's not a TL...the TL and TSX are dead. TLX should have it's own page as a 1st gen car.
Getting one? Nope. It would be a step down from my 7 year old type s. Maybe when and if they release a true sports version.
And why is the TLX here in the forums as a 5th Gen TL? It's not a TL...the TL and TSX are dead. TLX should have it's own page as a 1st gen car.
#24
Senior Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,634
Received 2,328 Likes
on
1,308 Posts
Well I'm keeping my S2000 and trading in the Accord. Having said that, I'd love to see a Type S...
#25
Senior Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,634
Received 2,328 Likes
on
1,308 Posts
Considered, yes.
Getting one? Nope. It would be a step down from my 7 year old type s. Maybe when and if they release a true sports version.
And why is the TLX here in the forums as a 5th Gen TL? It's not a TL...the TL and TSX are dead. TLX should have it's own page as a 1st gen car.
Getting one? Nope. It would be a step down from my 7 year old type s. Maybe when and if they release a true sports version.
And why is the TLX here in the forums as a 5th Gen TL? It's not a TL...the TL and TSX are dead. TLX should have it's own page as a 1st gen car.
The following users liked this post:
FamilyGuy (09-02-2014)
#26
It's tough for die-hard MT drivers these days, and even though I don't want to go auto, I'm afraid I'll have to consider some auto-only cars next time around, including the TLX and the IS350 F-Sport. The 6MT cars in this segment all have issues. The ATS is too small for family duty, and properly equipped (e.g., with LSD) is way too expensive IMO. We all know about the cost and reliability issues with BMW, and I strongly dislike the steering in the 3 Series, but IMO it's still probably the best MT option in the segment. No way I'm going with Audi unless I'm convinced the reliability issues have been addressed.
So I'm not sure where I'd end up, but it would probably come down to the TLX v. 3 Series, just as it was TSX v. 3 Series last time. If the BMW's steering has been improved enough, I'd probably go that route. It's a great car overall, and I'm not surprised it's sold so well.
Ideally, however, we'd replace our Mazda 5 with something safer and more road trip worthy, so "my" car could be smaller. Then I'd get a WRX or Focus ST.
So I'm not sure where I'd end up, but it would probably come down to the TLX v. 3 Series, just as it was TSX v. 3 Series last time. If the BMW's steering has been improved enough, I'd probably go that route. It's a great car overall, and I'm not surprised it's sold so well.
Ideally, however, we'd replace our Mazda 5 with something safer and more road trip worthy, so "my" car could be smaller. Then I'd get a WRX or Focus ST.
#27
Racer
No 6MT TLX so I decided to go with a MDX. Swapped my 2012 6MT TL last Tuesday. Happy I went with the MDX vs the TLX. I liked the TLX but the MDX made more sense for me if I could not get a 6MT.
#28
Instructor
Thinking about either TLX SH-AWD or the Audi S3, sometime next spring/summer. Leaning toward the S3 right now based on performance, but a 6MT option would tip me toward the Acura and I'd probably wait til 2016 MY for it. Will really on how they sit/feel (I'm getting older and much more critical of seat comfort...) and how they drive though.
#30
I considered the TLX after I saw the prototype. I knew there wasn't going to be a 6 speed manual but I figured if the car looked like that, had comparable 0-60 performance to my 6MT Type S, AND had a killer interior maybe it would be worth it to not have a manual and switch over.
All of that went out the window when the car was actually released.
Performance isn't what I expected, the look is considerably blander (although still pretty nice, just not the "OMG thats awesome" look of the prototype), and the interior--well for me I don't care about the interior if the other two items aren't up to what I would want.
I just have to accept the fact that Acura will probably never make another car in a manual like the 3G Type S. Its a shame, but it is what it is.
All of that went out the window when the car was actually released.
Performance isn't what I expected, the look is considerably blander (although still pretty nice, just not the "OMG thats awesome" look of the prototype), and the interior--well for me I don't care about the interior if the other two items aren't up to what I would want.
I just have to accept the fact that Acura will probably never make another car in a manual like the 3G Type S. Its a shame, but it is what it is.
The following users liked this post:
justnspace (09-04-2014)
#32
First off, to all these clowns talking about a Chevy SS and cursing Acura- how about switching forums? If you want the best handling sedan shop BMW, if you are all about straight line power than go with your bow tie brand or buy a hemi. For those of us who value Acura for offering a well balanced blend of handling, performance, fuel economy, luxury, and the outstanding reliability Honda is known for, let's get back to the subject at hand.
Yes I currently drive a 1st gen black on black TSX 6MT navi with only 90K but am strongly considering the new TLX. Drove one yesterday and looked the car over top to bottom and was very impressed overall.
Yes I currently drive a 1st gen black on black TSX 6MT navi with only 90K but am strongly considering the new TLX. Drove one yesterday and looked the car over top to bottom and was very impressed overall.
#34
#35
I feel the need...
#36
I feel the need...
Just picked up my black/black SH-AWD TECH. Still have a tinge of regret on selling my 4G 6MT. Swapping some sportiness for luxury is a trade-off I'm willing to take because a bona fide sports car is in the future.
Too early to post much in the way of driving impressions because I've been easy on the throttle, but overall a nice incremental improvement over the 4G.
Too early to post much in the way of driving impressions because I've been easy on the throttle, but overall a nice incremental improvement over the 4G.
#37
Suzuka Master
Just picked up my black/black SH-AWD TECH. Still have a tinge of regret on selling my 4G 6MT. Swapping some sportiness for luxury is a trade-off I'm willing to take because a bona fide sports car is in the future.
Too early to post much in the way of driving impressions because I've been easy on the throttle, but overall a nice incremental improvement over the 4G.
Too early to post much in the way of driving impressions because I've been easy on the throttle, but overall a nice incremental improvement over the 4G.
Grats!
#39
Advanced
Due to a left ankle fracture a few years ago I am not into pumping the clutch pedal in long drives or city traffic anymore. The 8 spd DCT in my TLX is a great and I don't really miss my 13 Accord Sport 6 M/T. At least I've got paddles and rev matching to play with.
#40
The lease is coming up (Jan 1) on my 2010 6mt sh-awd... I was at the dealer today looking at the tlx.
I drove one and was impressed generally with the car... but... I traded my 2007 TL auto for the 2010 because of the manual transmission. Having said that, they fixed a good portion of things I don't like about the 2010... No having to hit "OK" every time you start the car, no oddly spaced trunk and trunk hump, no folding seats, Nav traffic that actually works... And then added some features that I think are really useful, like cross traffic alert etc.
Don't know if that makes up for the stick though... I drove the 9 sp auto shawd but from what I hear, the 8 sp dct is a sweet heart... Kinda wish it was available across the board.
I drove one and was impressed generally with the car... but... I traded my 2007 TL auto for the 2010 because of the manual transmission. Having said that, they fixed a good portion of things I don't like about the 2010... No having to hit "OK" every time you start the car, no oddly spaced trunk and trunk hump, no folding seats, Nav traffic that actually works... And then added some features that I think are really useful, like cross traffic alert etc.
Don't know if that makes up for the stick though... I drove the 9 sp auto shawd but from what I hear, the 8 sp dct is a sweet heart... Kinda wish it was available across the board.