Photographers Beware: Seagate Slapped with a Class Action Suit Over Bad Hard Drives
#1
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Photographers Beware: Seagate Slapped with a Class Action Suit Over Bad Hard Drives
Photographers Beware: Seagate Slapped with a Class Action Suit Over Bad Hard Drives
Backing up your data properly is a critical responsibility for digital photographers these days, but if you use certain Seagate hard drives in your setup, you may want to think about alternatives.
Seagate was hit with a class action lawsuit today by consumers who claim that the company’s hard drives “failed to live up to the advertised promises” by failing and causing the loss of data.
TechSpot reports that the lawsuit was just filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
It specifically points the finger at Seagate’s 3TB hard drives: the Barracuda 3TB and the Backup Plus 3TB External. The complaint alleges that these particular drives “failed at exceptionally high rates, leaving consumers with broken hardware and significant loss of data.”
Some of the reported failures occurred just days after the customers first began storing data on the drives. The cloud storage company Backblaze has tested over 49,000 drives over the years, and the results confirm that Seagate’s 3TB drives are among the least reliable.
The lawsuit also accuses of Seagate of sending out faulty and unreliable drives as replacements to customers who experienced failures with their original drives — something that goes against both consumer laws and Seagate’s own warranties.
If you’ve been using a large 3TB Seagate Barracuda drive to preserve your photo files, hopefully you haven’t been storing all your eggs in one basket. Make sure you either switch drives or back the data up elsewhere as well, just in case your drive does give out. And if you’ve experienced a failure with one of these drives yourself, you’re being encouraged to contact the law firm behind the suit to join in on it.
Seagate was hit with a class action lawsuit today by consumers who claim that the company’s hard drives “failed to live up to the advertised promises” by failing and causing the loss of data.
TechSpot reports that the lawsuit was just filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
It specifically points the finger at Seagate’s 3TB hard drives: the Barracuda 3TB and the Backup Plus 3TB External. The complaint alleges that these particular drives “failed at exceptionally high rates, leaving consumers with broken hardware and significant loss of data.”
Some of the reported failures occurred just days after the customers first began storing data on the drives. The cloud storage company Backblaze has tested over 49,000 drives over the years, and the results confirm that Seagate’s 3TB drives are among the least reliable.
The lawsuit also accuses of Seagate of sending out faulty and unreliable drives as replacements to customers who experienced failures with their original drives — something that goes against both consumer laws and Seagate’s own warranties.
If you’ve been using a large 3TB Seagate Barracuda drive to preserve your photo files, hopefully you haven’t been storing all your eggs in one basket. Make sure you either switch drives or back the data up elsewhere as well, just in case your drive does give out. And if you’ve experienced a failure with one of these drives yourself, you’re being encouraged to contact the law firm behind the suit to join in on it.
#2
Needs more Lemon Pledge
The barracuda line is the basic line in Seagate's lineup and the 3TBs were known to be crappy.
#3
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,127
Received 4,824 Likes
on
2,571 Posts
I only use the mid to upper end Deskstar drives. OWC uses them or Toshiba...and I wont give Toshiba my money. Knock on wood, the Deskstars have treated me over the years. Better than any other drive.
#4
Senior Moderator
We used to call those Deathstars because of their high failure rate
#6
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,178
Received 2,773 Likes
on
1,976 Posts
Just saw this, fuck sea gate. The one time I bought seagate and ended up with a 500GB drive poop out on me within 2 years. It was back with their 7200.11 drives and their bad firmware. Something about the drive getting stuck in a spin state.
i still need to get around to fixing the drive so I can get back my photos from pre-2008.
i still need to get around to fixing the drive so I can get back my photos from pre-2008.
#7
Moderator
I know this is a hard drive topic, but anyone also use the cloud as storage? I use my Dropbox and Flickr for my photo storage. I trust their hardware a lot more than my own.
Trending Topics
#8
Ex-OEM King
I only run WD hard drives. Never have, knock on wood, had one fail. I need to get a NAS set up soon though.
I push my important stuff to Google Drive and use Flickr to share finished edits. I keep the raw files locally.
I push my important stuff to Google Drive and use Flickr to share finished edits. I keep the raw files locally.
#10
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,178
Received 2,773 Likes
on
1,976 Posts
You should be doing both. Redundancy and cloud/off-site storage