Cameras & Photography Because there aren't already enough ways to share photos...

Official Lens Discussion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-30-2007, 08:18 PM
  #281  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,178
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
Originally Posted by moeronn
Why can't you?

the terms in the release forms.. i knew i should've paid more. ohh well
Old 11-30-2007, 08:28 PM
  #282  
Earth-bound misfit
 
wndrlst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 31,704
Received 608 Likes on 312 Posts
Originally Posted by stogie1020

I have a really stupid emotional attachment to money. First I need to learn to hate the $2000, then I can spend it...
Let me know if you ever figure that out...
Old 11-30-2007, 08:35 PM
  #283  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,967 Likes on 5,137 Posts
Originally Posted by stogie1020
I have a really stupid emotional attachment to money. First I need to learn to hate the $2000, then I can spend it...
I think I have like, the opposite of that...
Old 11-30-2007, 08:39 PM
  #284  
Earth-bound misfit
 
wndrlst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 31,704
Received 608 Likes on 312 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
I think I have like, the opposite of that...
So what you're saying is: You already hate your money & you would like it to find a new home.



Just pm me your addy - I'll send a self-addressed, stamped envelope....
Old 11-30-2007, 08:40 PM
  #285  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,967 Likes on 5,137 Posts
game, set, and match.
Old 11-30-2007, 08:43 PM
  #286  
Earth-bound misfit
 
wndrlst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 31,704
Received 608 Likes on 312 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
game, set, and match.
Don't cry...I'll take it off your hands. Promise.
Old 11-30-2007, 08:46 PM
  #287  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,967 Likes on 5,137 Posts
BUt you see, the problem is, I have no emotional attachment to it - so - I can't send you any - because - I don't have any.
Old 11-30-2007, 09:01 PM
  #288  
Earth-bound misfit
 
wndrlst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 31,704
Received 608 Likes on 312 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
BUt you see, the problem is, I have no emotional attachment to it - so - I can't send you any - because - I don't have any.







Damn
Old 12-16-2007, 02:33 PM
  #289  
Team Owner
 
EuRTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: District of Corruption
Age: 36
Posts: 23,588
Received 105 Likes on 69 Posts
Need some help for some lens advice.

I'm going to California in June to take pictures for my girlfriend's Graduation, and it's going to be on their Football Field (Fancy, I know.)

But regardless, I need to know if there are any good recommendations on lens that get nice pictures from the bleachers to the field.

I was thinking of the Nikon 70-200mm Lens, but then again $1,3-1,4k is a bit steep for me right now. The purchase will be in a couple of months, but still need some advice on what should be sufficient, and what would be an overkill.
Old 12-16-2007, 03:18 PM
  #290  
Photography Nerd
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 43
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by EuRTSX
Need some help for some lens advice.

I'm going to California in June to take pictures for my girlfriend's Graduation, and it's going to be on their Football Field (Fancy, I know.)

But regardless, I need to know if there are any good recommendations on lens that get nice pictures from the bleachers to the field.

I was thinking of the Nikon 70-200mm Lens, but then again $1,3-1,4k is a bit steep for me right now. The purchase will be in a couple of months, but still need some advice on what should be sufficient, and what would be an overkill.
The sigma 70-200 f/2.8 is actually very good. You might want to check it out as an option...
Old 12-16-2007, 04:32 PM
  #291  
Team Owner
 
EuRTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: District of Corruption
Age: 36
Posts: 23,588
Received 105 Likes on 69 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
The sigma 70-200 f/2.8 is actually very good. You might want to check it out as an option...

Thanks Dan, a great alternative to the purchase. I might even buy it tonight!



Cheers,

Chris
Old 12-16-2007, 04:48 PM
  #292  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Too bad you have Nik0n, I could give you a good deal on a 70-200 2.8.
Old 12-16-2007, 04:52 PM
  #293  
Photography Nerd
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 43
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by EuRTSX
Thanks Dan, a great alternative to the purchase. I might even buy it tonight!



Cheers,

Chris
Our wedding photographer has one and the results were fantastic. Even though he's got the best gear that Canon has to offer, he preferred the Sigma over the Canon for it's relatively lightweight design and enhanced colour saturation. I was surprised, but the results speak for themselves.
Old 12-16-2007, 04:52 PM
  #294  
Team Owner
 
EuRTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: District of Corruption
Age: 36
Posts: 23,588
Received 105 Likes on 69 Posts
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
Too bad you have Nik0n, I could give you a good deal on a 70-200 2.8.

<.< You Canon people...


Check your PM.
Old 12-16-2007, 04:52 PM
  #295  
Team Owner
 
EuRTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: District of Corruption
Age: 36
Posts: 23,588
Received 105 Likes on 69 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
Our wedding photographer has one and the results were fantastic. Even though he's got the best gear that Canon has to offer, he preferred the Sigma over the Canon for it's relatively lightweight design and enhanced colour saturation. I was surprised, but the results speak for themselves.

Wow, I'm very excited to get this then haha
Old 12-16-2007, 04:53 PM
  #296  
Photography Nerd
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 43
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
Too bad you have Nik0n, I could give you a good deal on a 70-200 2.8.
You've got too many lenses already, so if you'd like to donate it to a good cause, I'll send you my shipping info.
Old 12-16-2007, 05:13 PM
  #297  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
I have to pay for the other ones somehow.
Old 12-16-2007, 05:20 PM
  #298  
Photography Nerd
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 43
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Did you get the 85 1.2 yet? I'm still jealous of that one...

I hope to get the 85 1.8 soon, and I'm going to start saving for a 35 1.4 this year. I don't know when, but I'll get the 85 1.2 on the radar sometime down the road.
Old 12-16-2007, 05:34 PM
  #299  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Yes, I did get it. I was going to go around with it yesterday but weather is not too nice right now. That thing is a tank, I had never seen it in person before. No one around here ever had in stock when I was trying to see it. It is going to take awhile to get use to it. Especially the focus ring.
Old 12-16-2007, 05:48 PM
  #300  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
85mm 1.2L vs 50mm 1.4

Old 12-16-2007, 05:49 PM
  #301  
Photography Nerd
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 43
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
Yes, I did get it. I was going to go around with it yesterday but weather is not too nice right now. That thing is a tank, I had never seen it in person before. No one around here ever had in stock when I was trying to see it. It is going to take awhile to get use to it. Especially the focus ring.
It's only 3.3 inches long, but it weighs 2.2 pounds... they don't call it "the grenade" for nothing!

People will definitely take you seriously when you take their portraits with it though.
Old 12-16-2007, 05:55 PM
  #302  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,967 Likes on 5,137 Posts
wow nice - here's a review of it with some good sample shots:

http://www.wlcastleman.com/equip/reviews/85mm/index.htm
Old 12-16-2007, 07:25 PM
  #303  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,178
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
yea when i first someone photographing basketball with that lens, my face was like this
Old 12-16-2007, 08:27 PM
  #304  
Earth-bound misfit
 
wndrlst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 31,704
Received 608 Likes on 312 Posts
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
85mm 1.2L vs 50mm 1.4

That sucker's huge!
Old 12-17-2007, 12:16 PM
  #305  
Team Owner
 
EuRTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: District of Corruption
Age: 36
Posts: 23,588
Received 105 Likes on 69 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse
yea when i first someone photographing basketball with that lens, my face was like this

Engrish Mizouse, Engrish.
Old 12-17-2007, 12:16 PM
  #306  
Team Owner
 
EuRTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: District of Corruption
Age: 36
Posts: 23,588
Received 105 Likes on 69 Posts
Originally Posted by wndrlst
That sucker's huge!



That's a huge whopper indeed.
Old 12-17-2007, 12:37 PM
  #307  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
badboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NJ
Age: 44
Posts: 4,197
Received 16 Likes on 8 Posts
is the lowest f for the canon lineup 1.2?
Old 12-17-2007, 01:07 PM
  #308  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Canon did make a EF 50mm 1.0 it was about $2500 new 4 years ago. I don't think they made them long.
Old 12-17-2007, 06:09 PM
  #309  
I kAnt Spel guD
 
MrChad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
Canon did make a EF 50mm 1.0 it was about $2500 new 4 years ago. I don't think they made them long.
The f/1.0 was discontinued b/c it used Lead glass in some of the elements and Canon is striving for Earth friendly components now.

Prior to the f/1.0 they did have an FD 50mm f/0.95 also.
Old 12-17-2007, 09:16 PM
  #310  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,178
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
Originally Posted by EuRTSX
Engrish Mizouse, Engrish.
yea my bad, i realized that after i made the post and the 5 minute edit time

what it should say is

yea when i photographed a basketball game for the first time, i saw someone using the 85mm 1.2 and my face was like this
Old 12-20-2007, 02:52 PM
  #311  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,967 Likes on 5,137 Posts
holy cow...

Old 12-20-2007, 02:54 PM
  #312  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
hey... I have that
Old 12-20-2007, 02:55 PM
  #313  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,967 Likes on 5,137 Posts
uh.. i know.. thats why i posted it.. :troutslap
Old 12-20-2007, 02:59 PM
  #314  
Masshole
 
Handruin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: MA
Age: 47
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by srika
holy cow...


It's a beautiful lens, but something of an odd focal length for a crop camera. At 85 x 1.6 = 136mm, it's not exactly a great zoom, and it's a bit much for a portrait. Otherwise from what I've read it has great optics.
Old 12-20-2007, 03:00 PM
  #315  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Not when it's on a 5D.
Old 12-20-2007, 03:02 PM
  #316  
Masshole
 
Handruin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: MA
Age: 47
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
Not when it's on a 5D.
Well, right. The 5D is not a crop camera, and therefore a perfect fit (and also for a 1Ds Mark II). I believe srika has the 5D, but that picture posted is a 30D which has a 1.6 crop.
Old 12-20-2007, 03:03 PM
  #317  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
I gotcha, but on the 1.6 it's like a 135 which is another great lens.
Old 12-20-2007, 03:08 PM
  #318  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,967 Likes on 5,137 Posts
main reason I posted the pic was not to show that it was attached to a 30D, but to show the ridiculous opening of the lens!!!

ps. jupe has a 5D too
Old 12-20-2007, 03:12 PM
  #319  
Masshole
 
Handruin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: MA
Age: 47
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It is huge...but I think that's what has to be done to get as fast as a F/1.2 @ 85mm no?
Old 12-20-2007, 03:18 PM
  #320  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,967 Likes on 5,137 Posts
Originally Posted by Handruin
It is huge...but I think that's what has to be done to get as fast as a F/1.2 @ 85mm no?
yea


Quick Reply: Official Lens Discussion Thread



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 AM.