Cameras & Photography Because there aren't already enough ways to share photos...

Canon: News, Rumors and Discussion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-02-2012, 12:20 AM
  #321  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,178
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts



so they finally changed the grip!

i never liked how you put in the two batteries on the XXD and 5D grips.


will it accept the 1D battery?
Old 03-02-2012, 12:26 AM
  #322  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,178
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts


.
Old 03-02-2012, 12:33 AM
  #323  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,178
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts


Old 03-02-2012, 12:33 AM
  #324  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,178
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
i guess im the only one that cares
Old 03-02-2012, 01:06 AM
  #325  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,178
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
sample images and movies

http://web.canon.jp/imaging/eosd/samples/eos5dmk3/
Old 03-02-2012, 01:11 AM
  #326  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,178
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
geez the site is getting hammered.

and yes they have full resolution images.
Old 03-02-2012, 05:30 AM
  #327  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,967 Likes on 5,137 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse



so they finally changed the grip!

i never liked how you put in the two batteries on the XXD and 5D grips.


will it accept the 1D battery?
And I heard they want over $500 for it. wtf
Old 03-02-2012, 05:31 AM
  #328  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,967 Likes on 5,137 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse
i guess im the only one that's awake
Fixed.
Old 03-02-2012, 07:44 AM
  #329  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
I don't see 1 reason why this camera is a penny over $2,999. Its $3,799 CAD

I don't get it.
Old 03-02-2012, 09:02 AM
  #330  
Burning Brakes
 
SaaBaaDoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: GA
Age: 48
Posts: 882
Received 478 Likes on 129 Posts
They are smoking crack with the price of that grip! 5DIII sounds like it's going to be awesome though. Worth the money? Probably not.
Old 03-02-2012, 09:12 AM
  #331  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,178
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
And I heard they want over $500 for it. wtf
not quite over $500...

MSRP $490..
Old 03-02-2012, 09:13 AM
  #332  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,178
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
Fixed.
you were awake earlier when i started posting it
Old 03-02-2012, 09:14 AM
  #333  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,127
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
I'm shocked. The video features are extremely lacking compared to the d4/d800

I figured it would raise the bar again...but not at all...didn't even balance he playing field. And for the price...

They are banking on canon loyalists at this point.
Old 03-02-2012, 09:15 AM
  #334  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,178
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
high ISO samples.

http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/re...ht-iso-samples
Old 03-02-2012, 09:18 AM
  #335  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,178
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
ISO 51200

Old 03-02-2012, 09:21 AM
  #336  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
I'm shocked. The video features are extremely lacking compared to the d4/d800

I figured it would raise the bar again...but not at all...didn't even balance he playing field. And for the price...

They are banking on canon loyalists at this point.
Seems all they did was get rid of a eight year old auto focus.
Old 03-02-2012, 09:47 AM
  #337  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,178
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
The sensor is different, they went gapless. Iirc the 5D2 was not.
Old 03-02-2012, 09:53 AM
  #338  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,178
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
600 bux for that flash too...

Seems like they overpriced everything.

A 580ex2 is what 450? Get that and a pocket wizard and the cost is the same
Old 03-02-2012, 09:57 AM
  #339  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse
The sensor is different, they went gapless. Iirc the 5D2 was not.
superficial changes, they are.
Old 03-02-2012, 10:04 AM
  #340  
Earth-bound misfit
 
wndrlst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 31,704
Received 608 Likes on 312 Posts
Ugh. They've flipped their lids with pricing. Seriously considering throwing in the Canon towel...
Old 03-02-2012, 10:30 AM
  #341  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,967 Likes on 5,137 Posts
the D800 is looking mighty fine now....... only thing is I'd have to get new lenses.... and a flash... lol..
Old 03-02-2012, 10:32 AM
  #342  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,178
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
superficial changes, they are.
Thinner/not as strong AA filter?
Old 03-02-2012, 10:32 AM
  #343  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,127
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
the D800 is looking mighty fine now....... only thing is I'd have to get new lenses.... and a flash... lol..
And thats where canon is going to keep customers...same as nikon.

Once you get invested in a system, its hard to dump everything and switch and not be out some cash for it.
Old 03-02-2012, 10:37 AM
  #344  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
And thats where canon is going to keep customers...same as nikon.

Once you get invested in a system, its hard to dump everything and switch and not be out some cash for it.
But if you're just starting out (Ok maybe you're not spending 3k if you're just starting but still) Why would they price it so high compared to the competition? I'm at a loss for words on that price. At 3K you can make a case...but up here its $800 more than a D800

I'm thinking maybe they'll be offering a cheaper FF that will slot in a $2-2.5K but with what specs? The Specs of the III are at most a 3K camera.
Old 03-02-2012, 10:43 AM
  #345  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,127
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
But if you're just starting out (Ok maybe you're not spending 3k if you're just starting but still) Why would they price it so high compared to the competition? I'm at a loss for words on that price. At 3K you can make a case...but up here its $800 more than a D800

I'm thinking maybe they'll be offering a cheaper FF that will slot in a $2-2.5K but with what specs? The Specs of the III are at most a 3K camera.
Wait $800 more? I thought they wanted 3500...they are asking 3800!?!?!?!

Well...they are truly off their rocker if thats the reality of it...

Someone is gonna get fired over that.
Old 03-02-2012, 10:50 AM
  #346  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,127
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
body vs body I see the the mkIII being only $500 more.

Still...you don't get anything extra for that $500...at all.
Old 03-02-2012, 12:35 PM
  #347  
Earth-bound misfit
 
wndrlst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 31,704
Received 608 Likes on 312 Posts
I've been reading reviews & Q&A from Jeff Ascough ( ) and it's killing me. I really, really want one, but the price is unreasonable. And the prices on the new flash & transmitter? I'll keep my 580 II's and invest in RP's.
Old 03-02-2012, 12:41 PM
  #348  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,967 Likes on 5,137 Posts
5D3 + grip + flash = $4700 or so... I think this also makes the 1DX look more appealing!
Old 03-02-2012, 12:53 PM
  #349  
Earth-bound misfit
 
wndrlst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 31,704
Received 608 Likes on 312 Posts
Yeah, the grip price is out of this world too high. Thankfully, I've never used one, and probably never will.

Ascough says the tsunami and the value of the yen are factors influencing the high price. It's understandable, but I still think they'd do much, much better to knock it below $3k. They'd compensate for the lower price with higher volume. I wouldn't hesitate to pull the trigger at the lower price point. As it is, I'm considering picking up a used Mk II. I'll have to think about it, and wait for more hands-on reviews.

I don't have any weddings to shoot until June, so I have some time, but I'll want a couple of months with whatever I pick up to learn its ins & outs. I'm very happy with the 7Ds for portraits. Decisions decisions...
Old 03-02-2012, 12:57 PM
  #350  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,967 Likes on 5,137 Posts
gee, can you make it any more obvious??



Old 03-02-2012, 01:07 PM
  #351  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,127
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Originally Posted by wndrlst
Yeah, the grip price is out of this world too high. Thankfully, I've never used one, and probably never will.

Ascough says the tsunami and the value of the yen are factors influencing the high price. It's understandable, but I still think they'd do much.
I don't either considering the cost of the D800.

Though the D4 is a $1000 increase over the price of the D3(s)

And just to make people not feel SO bad about the handgrip...I think I remember reading the handgrip for the D800 is also $500
Old 03-02-2012, 01:08 PM
  #352  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,349
Received 2,786 Likes on 1,409 Posts
There are some very unimpressed Canon shooters regarding the announcement

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...hread=40771174
Old 03-02-2012, 01:08 PM
  #353  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Originally Posted by wndrlst
I've been reading reviews & Q&A from Jeff Ascough ( ) and it's killing me. I really, really want one, but the price is unreasonable. And the prices on the new flash & transmitter? I'll keep my 580 II's and invest in RP's.
Reading from his blog?



I love how he is "bashing" those talking about dpreview.



Also pricing here is HIGH, what they price in dollars here, just use those same number in British Pounds for England.
Old 03-02-2012, 01:16 PM
  #354  
Earth-bound misfit
 
wndrlst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 31,704
Received 608 Likes on 312 Posts
It's long been known that Nikon blows Canon out of the water with its native flash system...
Old 03-02-2012, 01:16 PM
  #355  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,127
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
Reading from his blog?



I love how he is "bashing" those talking about dpreview.



Also pricing here is HIGH, what they price in dollars here, just use those same number in British Pounds for England.
Link?

His blog is pretty void of anything...unless he has another one.
Old 03-02-2012, 01:19 PM
  #356  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
Link?

His blog is pretty void of anything...unless he has another one.

This is what I was reading

http://blog.jeffascough.com/photogra...ii-review.html
Old 03-02-2012, 01:21 PM
  #357  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
Wait $800 more? I thought they wanted 3500...they are asking 3800!?!?!?!
Its $3,799

Our pricing has been close to ($50-100 more) the US for some time now but this is $300 more for some reason. D800 is $2,999 CAD.
Old 03-02-2012, 01:22 PM
  #358  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,967 Likes on 5,137 Posts
Originally Posted by wndrlst
It's long been known that Nikon blows Canon out of the water with its native flash system...
I was referring to the design..
Old 03-02-2012, 01:26 PM
  #359  
Earth-bound misfit
 
wndrlst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 31,704
Received 608 Likes on 312 Posts
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
Reading from his blog?



I love how he is "bashing" those talking about dpreview.



Also pricing here is HIGH, what they price in dollars here, just use those same number in British Pounds for England.
No, reading on the DWF.
Old 03-02-2012, 01:27 PM
  #360  
Earth-bound misfit
 
wndrlst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 31,704
Received 608 Likes on 312 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
I was referring to the design..
That it's the same? That's what I meant...that they have a reason to blatantly copy.


Quick Reply: Canon: News, Rumors and Discussion Thread



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:40 PM.