Cameras & Photography Because there aren't already enough ways to share photos...

Adobe: Lightroom News and Discussion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-20-2014, 09:32 AM
  #241  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,124
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Originally Posted by Nicks2001tl
With my math 10 bucks a month equals 120 bucks a year. Why wouldn`t you just get the upgrade for LR for 80 bucks. Photoshop is nice to have but LR generally gets used just as much if not more than PS.
I rarely use photoshop. So my thinking is in line with yours.

BUT

you need to look at the new mobile apps and how they interact with the computers versions...which is where my research will be towards.

And you can't use the apps without the stupid CC.
Old 06-20-2014, 09:45 AM
  #242  
Safety Car
 
Nicks2001tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New Berlin, WI.
Age: 53
Posts: 3,515
Received 505 Likes on 378 Posts
The mobile app is free with the 5.4 upgrade.


http://lightroomkillertips.com/first...htroom-mobile/
Old 06-20-2014, 10:11 AM
  #243  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Sly Raskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fontana, California
Age: 47
Posts: 30,991
Received 582 Likes on 346 Posts
Originally Posted by Nicks2001tl
With my math 10 bucks a month equals 120 bucks a year. Why wouldn`t you just get the upgrade for LR for 80 bucks. Photoshop is nice to have but LR generally gets used just as much if not more than PS.
My guess is that they are going to stop offering LR as a standalone product in the next release. Just a hunch. So even if you buy the standard upgrade now, doesn't mean you'll be able to do so in the future.
Old 06-20-2014, 10:12 AM
  #244  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,124
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Originally Posted by Nicks2001tl
The mobile app is free with the 5.4 upgrade.


http://lightroomkillertips.com/first...htroom-mobile/
All the apps are free. But in order to use them you must have the CC.
Old 06-20-2014, 10:12 AM
  #245  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Sly Raskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fontana, California
Age: 47
Posts: 30,991
Received 582 Likes on 346 Posts
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
LR upgrades are only $70. And upgrades aren't always annual.

But the all new LR and photoshop apps intrigue me.

I will have to think and research more on this.
You are correct sir, I had my pricings mixed up. That being said, $120 a year for someone that does use PS and LR is a decent deal then (not a steal as I originally stated). However, if you only need LR, it's not a great deal, unless the mobile side of things is that enticing. I haven't used the mobile app and don't know if I will. I currently only edit on my machine at home and don't think I need to edit on my iPad unless I'm away from home for extended periods of time.
Old 06-20-2014, 10:12 AM
  #246  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,124
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Originally Posted by Sly Raskal
My guess is that they are going to stop offering LR as a standalone product in the next release. Just a hunch. So even if you buy the standard upgrade now, doesn't mean you'll be able to do so in the future.
This is also something Im afraid of...and annoyed by.
Old 06-20-2014, 10:13 AM
  #247  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,124
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Originally Posted by Sly Raskal
You are correct sir, I had my pricings mixed up. That being said, $120 a year for someone that does use PS and LR is a decent deal then (not a steal as I originally stated). However, if you only need LR, it's not a great deal, unless the mobile side of things is that enticing.
This.

I rarely if ever use photoshop....but ideas like the new photoshop app...that lets you use your iPad in somewhat cintiq-ish ways is appealing.
Old 06-20-2014, 10:47 AM
  #248  
My first Avatar....
 
pttl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 23,904
Received 5,813 Likes on 3,731 Posts
Seems like Correl or Topaz will be in my future if LR becomes extinct as a stand alone. I'm not going to be FORCED into another monthly bill.
Old 06-20-2014, 11:03 AM
  #249  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Can't see Lightroom going away as a stand alone.
Old 06-20-2014, 11:08 AM
  #250  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,124
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
adobe has stated that it will keep it stand alone...but for how long is the question.
Old 06-20-2014, 11:17 AM
  #251  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
They saw a lot of basklash when they started CC, so much that they had to make a photographers bundle. Can't see them stopping LR as stand alone.
Old 06-20-2014, 11:19 AM
  #252  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,124
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
I hope so. I have to research the LR app to see if would even do things I would actually use.

If no...then I stick with the stand alone.
Old 06-23-2014, 03:36 PM
  #253  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Sly Raskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fontana, California
Age: 47
Posts: 30,991
Received 582 Likes on 346 Posts
Lightroom 5.5 now available!

http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjour...social26549306
Old 10-02-2014, 04:15 AM
  #254  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,349
Received 2,785 Likes on 1,409 Posts
I have a question/need help on something, but I'm not sure exactly how to word it...so I'll try my best to explain...

every time I upload photos to Lightroom to do any kind of work, it automatically saves the RAW files to my computer, and since I shoot RAW 95% of the time, this tend to fill up my storage fast.... Every month or so, I have to either delete those RAW files OR move them manually to an external hard drive... My question is... is there any way I can make it either NOT save any RAW files at all? OR perhaps divert the saving directly to an external hard drive? I've looked into the settings and preference tabs and don't see anything to do this.
Old 10-02-2014, 12:00 PM
  #255  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,966 Likes on 5,137 Posts
Originally Posted by is300eater
I have a question/need help on something, but I'm not sure exactly how to word it...so I'll try my best to explain...

every time I upload photos to Lightroom to do any kind of work, it automatically saves the RAW files to my computer, and since I shoot RAW 95% of the time, this tend to fill up my storage fast.... Every month or so, I have to either delete those RAW files OR move them manually to an external hard drive... My question is... is there any way I can make it either NOT save any RAW files at all? OR perhaps divert the saving directly to an external hard drive? I've looked into the settings and preference tabs and don't see anything to do this.
if it didn't save your image files to your hard drive, you wouldn't be able to work on the images!

I use external hard drives for all images - they are fairly affordable these days it's not like back when it used to be an issue. I mean you can get a nice 3TB drive for around $100 - I use this one: http://amzn.to/1oENeBe
Old 10-02-2014, 12:10 PM
  #256  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,176
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
Yea, save them to an external and keep them in their original location when you import to LR. And with LR5 you can edit via the smart previews even if the external drive isn't connected.
Old 10-02-2014, 12:11 PM
  #257  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,176
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
Srika that link is for an internal hard drive.


Btw He's using a MacBook pro.
Old 10-02-2014, 12:13 PM
  #258  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,966 Likes on 5,137 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse
Srika that link is for an internal hard drive.


Btw He's using a MacBook pro.
yeah, you need a USB enclosure to go with it. something like this: http://amzn.to/1nSADiT
Old 10-02-2014, 12:28 PM
  #259  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,176
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
Interesting looking enclosure
Old 10-02-2014, 12:39 PM
  #260  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,966 Likes on 5,137 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse
Interesting looking enclosure
I don't have that same one - I have a bunch of those, so I can have portable 3TB drives anywhere I go. Very convenient.
Old 10-02-2014, 12:42 PM
  #261  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,176
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
And damn 3TB HDs being $100

Time to upgrade my 1TB raid 1 setups.
Old 10-02-2014, 12:48 PM
  #262  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,966 Likes on 5,137 Posts
I have this one which I like a lot - it's USB 3.0

http://amzn.to/1rPT47U
Old 10-02-2014, 12:52 PM
  #263  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,176
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
That's a cool looking enclosure. But it doesn't work for me since I want redundancy.
Old 10-02-2014, 12:56 PM
  #264  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,966 Likes on 5,137 Posts
have this one too - dual drives

http://amzn.to/1r2UQgp
Old 10-02-2014, 12:59 PM
  #265  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,349
Received 2,785 Likes on 1,409 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
if it didn't save your image files to your hard drive, you wouldn't be able to work on the images!

I use external hard drives for all images - they are fairly affordable these days it's not like back when it used to be an issue. I mean you can get a nice 3TB drive for around $100 - I use this one: Amazon.com: Seagate Desktop 3 TB HDD SATA 6 Gb/s NCQ 64MB Cache 7200 RPM 3.5-Inch Internal Bare Drive ST3000DM001: Electronics
I guess I kinda knew that, because when I need to make room, I delete those files and when I go back to them, Lightroom says it can't be found or whatever, but I guess my question was about how divert it to an external hard drive rather the computer's hard drive, like what Mizouse is suggesting.

Originally Posted by Mizouse
Yea, save them to an external and keep them in their original location when you import to LR. And with LR5 you can edit via the smart previews even if the external drive isn't connected.
So, where in the settings do I make this happen?
Old 10-02-2014, 01:06 PM
  #266  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,966 Likes on 5,137 Posts
Originally Posted by is300eater
I guess I kinda knew that, because when I need to make room, I delete those files and when I go back to them, Lightroom says it can't be found or whatever, but I guess my question was about how divert it to an external hard drive rather the computer's hard drive, like what Mizouse is suggesting.

So, where in the settings do I make this happen?
right here at the top right - choose "Other Destination" and choose your external drive.


The following users liked this post:
is300eater (10-02-2014)
Old 10-02-2014, 01:08 PM
  #267  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,966 Likes on 5,137 Posts
oh also choosing DNG will save you some space in the long run, and also reduce headaches if you are working with different file formats like Sony's proprietary ARW and things like that - it standardizes your files. I mostly only do DNG. But this also takes longer to import since it has to convert each file.
Old 10-02-2014, 01:19 PM
  #268  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,176
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
What kind of headache? I have no issue switching between canon raw and Sony raw.
Old 10-02-2014, 01:42 PM
  #269  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,966 Likes on 5,137 Posts
if you're not using DNG I'm not going to try convincing you.
Old 10-02-2014, 01:49 PM
  #270  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,176
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
Ok
Old 10-02-2014, 01:52 PM
  #271  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,966 Likes on 5,137 Posts
what I mean is, this is personal preference. do it however you like to.

Regarding the "headaches", I don't have a ARW viewer in Windows, so I can't open those files if I just wanted to look in the file browser. Same goes for couple other formats. So if I convert them all to DNG, I don't have that issue.
Old 10-02-2014, 02:13 PM
  #272  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,966 Likes on 5,137 Posts
oh oops, I can view ARW files in Windows heh.

ok well, I just like all the files in one format!
Old 10-02-2014, 02:24 PM
  #273  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,124
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
I convert everything to DNG during import.

Its a more widely recognized standard that is less likely to get outdated/go away as RAW compatibility changes over the years.
The following users liked this post:
is300eater (10-02-2014)
Old 10-02-2014, 02:27 PM
  #274  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,176
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
Old 10-02-2014, 02:31 PM
  #275  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,966 Likes on 5,137 Posts
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
I convert everything to DNG during import.

Its a more widely recognized standard that is less likely to get outdated/go away as RAW compatibility changes over the years.
I switched after your recommendation.
Old 10-02-2014, 02:57 PM
  #276  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,124
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse
why funny?
Old 10-02-2014, 03:02 PM
  #277  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,966 Likes on 5,137 Posts
pretty sure he's laughing at me.
The following users liked this post:
Mizouse (10-02-2014)
Old 10-02-2014, 03:21 PM
  #278  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,176
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
pretty sure he's laughing at me.
Old 10-02-2014, 03:39 PM
  #279  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,124
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
heh
Old 10-02-2014, 05:08 PM
  #280  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,349
Received 2,785 Likes on 1,409 Posts
Thanks guys for the suggestions above.

So, at Costco (Canadian Costco that is... so, "Canadian Pricing"), they have a WD 4TB external hard drive for $220 that's wifi/cloud enabled, and a regular WD 4TB for $169...anyone know much about these wifi/cloud models? Is it worth it? Or just get the regular ones?


Quick Reply: Adobe: Lightroom News and Discussion Thread



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 PM.