Cameras & Photography Because there aren't already enough ways to share photos...

Adobe: Lightroom News and Discussion Thread

Old 12-20-2016, 10:52 AM
  #401  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,121
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
These products cost $799 dollars for Photoshop and $150 for LR. No problem paying $120 and having the latest updates and upgrades.


People pay thousands of dollars for cameras with such little upgrades and then strut about that have the MKIV or the MKIII, or such.

I'm on the CC...with a discount. And while its nice, its obnoxious. Adobe is a huge company and they are dominating. BUT they are assholes and the tech under their hood is behind the times. Its why Apple stopped natively supporting Flash. Its why there are so many users who are annoyed with Adobe but stuck in their ecosystem.

You've got two supposedly competing platforms out there....Iridescent and Capture One. Many people have been moving over and switching to them. BUT...the one thing Lightroom does better than them is their organization and archiving. I also like their GUI.

But Adobe HAS to get on board. Their apps could be blazingly fast if they retooled to use what Apple has given them in the hardware and core software. Instead adobe relies on eating up all your RAM and dragging ass half the time. It doesn't have to be that way, and it hasn't had to for years now.
Old 12-20-2016, 10:55 AM
  #402  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,045
Received 9,951 Likes on 5,135 Posts
Originally Posted by brian2
but if you're perfectly happy with the product you purchased originally?

IMO this all came about because they got sick of finding new ways to tweak the software to make it different enough to justify purchasing the newest release. Now they don't have to worry about updating/upgrading because they got your money anyway.
I agree, they just tweaked it so they could make more money. They followed the footsteps of video game companies who did similarly and found many many people are OK with it. I admit I caved for a lot of stuff myself on that front.
Old 12-20-2016, 11:29 AM
  #403  
Ex-OEM King
 
SamDoe1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 15,863
Received 5,810 Likes on 3,840 Posts
Anyone use Capture One regularly? Thoughts and opinions on it vs Lightroom?
Old 12-28-2016, 03:26 PM
  #404  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,169
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
Originally Posted by pttl
I had LR 6.7 and just went to CC anyway because I got it for $88 for the year. Plus I can now do stuff in PS that I couldn't do in PSE15.
Originally Posted by Mizouse
That's what I'm waiting for
close in price. Adobe CC photography is discounted till the end of the year to $99/yr.
can be used to extend an existing subscription.

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produ...aphy_plan.html
Old 12-28-2016, 10:00 PM
  #405  
My first Avatar....
 
pttl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 23,881
Received 5,801 Likes on 3,722 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse
close in price. Adobe CC photography is discounted till the end of the year to $99/yr.
can be used to extend an existing subscription.

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produ...aphy_plan.html

If you're on the fence do it. I just some stuff that I would never have been able to do with out it.
The following users liked this post:
Mizouse (12-29-2016)
Old 12-29-2016, 02:17 AM
  #406  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,343
Received 2,777 Likes on 1,406 Posts
Originally Posted by SamDoe1
Anyone use Capture One regularly? Thoughts and opinions on it vs Lightroom?
I bought the Sony only version when it was only $50... (not sure if it's still $50), originally I bought it mainly for the "Keystone" tool, which Adobe ended up bringing to Lightroom call "Guided Upright Tool" (though Capture One's version is easier to use)... THAT said, if I had the patience to learn how to use Capture One I would use it more, IMO it's better than Lightroom because you can do layers and masks like PS... but that learning curve
The following users liked this post:
Mizouse (12-29-2016)
Old 12-30-2016, 03:17 PM
  #407  
Moderator
 
mdkxtreme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 3,578
Received 322 Likes on 182 Posts
Originally Posted by is300eater
I bought the Sony only version when it was only $50... (not sure if it's still $50), originally I bought it mainly for the "Keystone" tool, which Adobe ended up bringing to Lightroom call "Guided Upright Tool" (though Capture One's version is easier to use)... THAT said, if I had the patience to learn how to use Capture One I would use it more, IMO it's better than Lightroom because you can do layers and masks like PS... but that learning curve
This is the reason why I haven't tried any tools other than Adobe's. It has taken me a LONG time to learn the workflow/processes in Adobe's products. I am by no means too stubborn to venture onto a new tool, but I've spent countless hours reading articles and watching YouTube videos on how to do this and that in Lightroom and Photoshop. Just thinking about "starting all over again" with Capture One puts a bitter taste in my mouth.
The following users liked this post:
is300eater (12-30-2016)
Old 10-18-2017, 10:03 AM
  #408  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,169
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
Lightroom CC moved to cloud only service. $19.99/month includes 1TB storage.

Non-cloud (current) Lightroom CC renamed to Lightroom Classic CC. Remains $9.99/month


Adobe's annual Adobe MAX conference kicks off today, and the company is introducing a whole slew of updates to its Creative Cloud platform. Among those updates is a new version of Adobe Photoshop Lightroom CC, which is now a full cloud-based photography service.

Lightroom CC has been available cross-platform for some time now with a dedicated Mac app and an iOS app, but with the new cloud service, Adobe is aiming to make editing and organizing photos simpler for both professionals and enthusiasts across multiple devices.


The new version of Lightroom CC continues to offer the same image editing capabilities that have been available in previous versions of Lightroom, but there's a new streamlined user interface with quick adjustment tools and presets that are quicker and easier to use.

All content is stored in the cloud, with Adobe providing users with up to 1TB of storage space that includes support for RAW images.


Full resolution photos stored in Lightroom can be edited on any device using the Lightroom CC app for Mac, the iOS app, or the web interface. Lightroom backs up all photos and keeps edits synced across devices.

Lightroom CC supports Adobe Sensei machine learning technology, which is able to recognize objects and people in photographs to make searching for and finding content simpler. Keywords are automatically applied to photos based on content.

Sharing tools make it simple to share Lightroom CC content directly to social networks, and there's an option to create Lightroom web galleries to showcase multiple photos at once. Lightroom CC also supports integration with Adobe Portfolio.


On iOS devices, the updated Lightroom CC app features the same Adobe Sensei search technology, and it offers an enhanced iPad layout and support for the iOS 11 Files app.

With the launch of the new cloud-based Lightroom CC app, Adobe is not eliminating the previous version of Lightroom. The older non-cloud version of Lightroom, which will continue to focus on a more traditional desktop-first workflow, has been renamed to Lightroom Classic CC. Lightroom Classic CC is also getting several new updates. It is gaining an enhanced Embedded Preview workflow for scrolling through large sets of photos faster than before, and new editing capabilities like a new Color Range and Luminance Masking feature.

With the launch of the Lightroom CC Cloud Photography service, Adobe is introducing new pricing plans. The Lightroom CC Cloud service with 1TB of storage plus Photoshop CC and access to Lightroom for mobile and web is priced at $19.99 per month. For existing Photography subscribers, Adobe is dropping that price to $14.99 per month for the first year.

Adobe is adding Lightroom CC to the existing Creative Cloud Photography plan and providing current subscribers with 20GB of storage space. The plan will continue to cost $9.99 per month and includes Lightroom CC, Lightroom mobile, Lightroom web, Lightroom Classic, and Photoshop CC.

A standalone Lightroom CC plan is available for customers who don't need Photoshop access. It includes 1TB of storage and access to the mobile and web apps for $9.99 per month. For mobile only users, there's a Lightroom Mobile plan for iOS that offers 100GB of cloud storage for $4.99 per month.

More information about Adobe's New Lightroom CC Cloud Photography service can be found on the Adobe website.

https://www.macrumors.com/2017/10/18...cloud-service/
Old 10-18-2017, 10:19 AM
  #409  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,169
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
Looks like the standalone version is done for.

6.13 with support for the D850 will be the final update
Old 10-18-2017, 01:35 PM
  #410  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,343
Received 2,777 Likes on 1,406 Posts
just keep using it until you get a new(er) camera that needs support... or go with Capture One?
Old 10-18-2017, 01:44 PM
  #411  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
I love how clean the NEW LR CC Interface is. But probably will never use it.
Old 10-18-2017, 02:08 PM
  #412  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,169
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
I don't like how for LR CC everything is in the cloud.

I'll have to get either LR6 and stick with that forever or get LR Classic CC and pray Adobe doesn't eventually drop that one too for the cloud
Old 10-18-2017, 02:18 PM
  #413  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
It's not for you, and thats why they have two.... Can't ever see them going all cloud base. I'm thinking only about 15-20% will go for the NEW LRCC.
Old 10-18-2017, 02:21 PM
  #414  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,169
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
Yea but they said they'd keep the standalone version around. Look at how that went
Old 10-18-2017, 02:23 PM
  #415  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,169
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
I won't ever use PS, why can't they offer just a LR subscription?
Old 10-18-2017, 04:43 PM
  #416  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
It's only ten bucks.... LR was $299 when first released with upgrades of $199, then $149.
The following users liked this post:
is300eater (10-18-2017)
Old 10-18-2017, 07:55 PM
  #417  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,121
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Upgrades were only like $70-80 towards the end.
The following users liked this post:
Mizouse (10-18-2017)
Old 10-18-2017, 07:57 PM
  #418  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,121
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
I don’t know if I like this new set up or now. 1tb is nice. The new pricing structure feels like an up charge.

But with apps like affinity seemingly beating photoshop at its own game. Stick with LR standalone for $10/mos and get that app if you need it.
Old 10-18-2017, 08:11 PM
  #419  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
Upgrades were only like $70-80 towards the end.
They had drop the retail price to $149 before they went CC. I stopped using it at LR3 then started again with LRCC, but it's nit part of my workflow now. Only use it when I have done event shooting and such, hundreds of images to process.
Old 10-18-2017, 08:15 PM
  #420  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,121
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
They had drop the retail price to $149 before they went CC. I stopped using it at LR3 then started again with LRCC, but it's nit part of my workflow now. Only use it when I have done event shooting and such, hundreds of images to process.
i havent shot much lately. But I have moved to processing on the iPad Pro.
Old 10-18-2017, 08:46 PM
  #421  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,169
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
It's only ten bucks.... LR was $299 when first released with upgrades of $199, then $149.
you cant think of it as "its only ten bucks"

For those of us that don't use photoshop its wasted money.

LR5 came out June 2013. Its been 52 months since then.

At $9.99/month you'd have spent $519.48 since then.

If you bought the standalone version of LR5 and upgraded to LR6 you'd have only spent $149 + $79 = $228

Thats a pretty significant difference.
Old 10-18-2017, 09:57 PM
  #422  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,343
Received 2,777 Likes on 1,406 Posts
I don't see it that way... A lot of it, has to do with how much you use it... For me, it's totally worth it, I easily blow $10 on random things...

It's like Netflix, if they have lots of contents that keep you entertaining, then it's worth it, but if you're one of those people that end up spending more time browsing through the menus and not really watch anything, then it's a waste of money
Old 10-18-2017, 10:00 PM
  #423  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,169
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
Originally Posted by is300eater
I don't see it that way... A lot of it, has to do with how much you use it... For me, it's totally worth it, I easily blow $10 on random things...

It's like Netflix, if they have lots of contents that keep you entertaining, then it's worth it, but if you're one of those people that end up spending more time browsing through the menus and not really watch anything, then it's a waste of money
well if you use PS, then sure its worth it. but like i said, IF you don't use PS, its extra money you're paying out of your pocket for something you're not using.
Old 10-18-2017, 10:24 PM
  #424  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,343
Received 2,777 Likes on 1,406 Posts
Back when I didn't use PS, I still thought it was worth it
Old 10-18-2017, 10:25 PM
  #425  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,169
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
Originally Posted by is300eater
Back when I didn't use PS, I still thought it was worth it
so in the long run you're willing to spend more than double the cost because "it's only $10"???
Old 10-19-2017, 09:36 AM
  #426  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,343
Received 2,777 Likes on 1,406 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse
so in the long run you're willing to spend more than double the cost because "it's only $10"???
yes
Again, this has a lot to do of how much you value photography.
Old 10-19-2017, 10:37 AM
  #427  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Originally Posted by is300eater
yes
Again, this has a lot to do of how much you value photography.
THIS!

Those that take a few photos here and there, use the software that came with your camera. Both Canon and Nikon have it. $10.00 per month is nothing for having the most up to date software with features that help me improve my images. THE NEW MASKING IN LRCC is a great feature!

Those that think it's more than they need...., shoot jpeg in camera and you're done. Hell, shoot RAW and edit your images in your camera!
The following users liked this post:
is300eater (10-19-2017)
Old 10-19-2017, 10:39 AM
  #428  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse
so in the long run you're willing to spend more than double the cost because "it's only $10"???

And it's NOT double! Fuck! PS was $699 for stand alone and $299 for upgrades. $10.00 a month is one less pussy coffee!
Old 10-19-2017, 10:40 AM
  #429  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,121
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Where do you find this so called pussy coffee?
The following 2 users liked this post by Sarlacc:
Mizouse (10-19-2017), pttl (10-19-2017)
Old 10-19-2017, 10:43 AM
  #430  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
Where do you find this so called pussy coffee?
Old 10-19-2017, 10:57 AM
  #431  
Ex-OEM King
 
SamDoe1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 15,863
Received 5,810 Likes on 3,840 Posts
I use LR exclusively and now that it has HDR and pano capabilities built in, I wouldn't really have a need to go to PS anymore. That said, I plan on signing up for the monthly thing. They will occasionally have deals that lower it to $8/mo as well if you buy in for a full year. I think it's totally worth it.

Also, for those who have a newer camera than their LR supports you can use Adobe's free DNG converter to convert the file type to something LR will read. This is what I do now since my version (5 I think?) doesn't support my A7II.
The following users liked this post:
Mizouse (10-19-2017)
Old 10-19-2017, 12:33 PM
  #432  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,169
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
Originally Posted by SamDoe1
I use LR exclusively and now that it has HDR and pano capabilities built in, I wouldn't really have a need to go to PS anymore. That said, I plan on signing up for the monthly thing. They will occasionally have deals that lower it to $8/mo as well if you buy in for a full year. I think it's totally worth it.

Also, for those who have a newer camera than their LR supports you can use Adobe's free DNG converter to convert the file type to something LR will read. This is what I do now since my version (5 I think?) doesn't support my A7II.
i ended up just upgrading to LR6.
Its only a flat $79, no further payments to keep it running.

For ME LR is all I want.

And like you said if I get a newer camera I'll use the DNG converter.
I used it before for the 80D and my copy of LR5.
Old 10-19-2017, 01:48 PM
  #433  
Ex-OEM King
 
SamDoe1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 15,863
Received 5,810 Likes on 3,840 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse
i ended up just upgrading to LR6.
Its only a flat $79, no further payments to keep it running.

For ME LR is all I want.

And like you said if I get a newer camera I'll use the DNG converter.
I used it before for the 80D and my copy of LR5.
Where did you go to get the upgrade to LR6 (same as LR Classic CC?), seems that Adobe only points to the subscription plans...
Old 10-19-2017, 01:53 PM
  #434  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Yes, we get it, it's all you want. Stop trying to quantify and dividing by zero every time a new version comes out. You werent going to buy a stand alone version if they came out with a LR7. So why make a big deal out of them not releasing one?
Old 10-19-2017, 02:20 PM
  #435  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,169
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
Originally Posted by SamDoe1
Where did you go to get the upgrade to LR6 (same as LR Classic CC?), seems that Adobe only points to the subscription plans...
you have to create a free Adobe account.
But here is what I did.

https://helpx.adobe.com/creative-clo...ghtroom-6.html
Old 01-05-2018, 03:09 PM
  #436  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,121
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
OK...well my promotion on my student/teacher account ran out...So, now that I dont get the entire Adobe suite for $15/month I wanted to cut my expense. So, I decided to go for the Lightroom CC with 1TB for 9.99/month.

Fuck me sideways. This might have been a mistake.

First of all I had no idea that Lightroom CC on the desktop was totally revamped to look like Lightroom CC on the apps. So, its basically like starting over with a whole new desktop interface...even though its similar to the mobile apps. But now I have to play with it and see if everything from the Classic version is in the CC version.

Second, dealing with migrating the catalog. I'm 45% in the middle of this...which was a pain to initiate to begin with. And I'm curious how it will end up because the file logging and structure in the main Lightroom CC folder is HORRIBLE. Like iPhoto categorizing horrible.

Third, making the account switch I lost everything I had in my mobile app's catalog...thankfully I hadn't done that much yet so I didn't really lose anything...but fuck you adobe, thats bullshit you couldn't let me transfer that over.

To my eye, as someone who has been an adobe user for over 2 decades now...they are now dogshit. I do not like much about them, except the comfort of knowing how to use their interface. I should be thankful they are terrible for Fuji RAF files. As soon as I can find a better all suited alternative...especially for the iPad, Im dropping them like a hot rock.

Fuck you Adobe.
The following users liked this post:
Mizouse (01-05-2018)
Old 01-05-2018, 04:30 PM
  #437  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Really surprised you didn’t know of the difference. So much information out on this.
Old 01-05-2018, 04:31 PM
  #438  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,121
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Originally Posted by jupitersolo
Really surprised you didn’t know of the difference. So much information out on this.
I remember reading about it all, but I didn't realize the totally changed the interface of CC vs Classic. If it does all the same shit as Classic I'll be fine for now. Right now I'm curious how its file structure will pan out.

Either way I'm trying to get away from Adobe.
The following users liked this post:
Mizouse (01-05-2018)
Old 01-05-2018, 06:43 PM
  #439  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,121
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Yup...31,000 photo catalog migrated over....not a single organized folder. Just 31,000 fucking photos.

Fuck you Adobe. Fuck you.
The following users liked this post:
Mizouse (01-05-2018)
Old 01-05-2018, 08:01 PM
  #440  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,169
Received 2,773 Likes on 1,976 Posts
I picked up Affinity for macOS when it was on sale for $40.

Seems pretty good so far. I mainly wanted it for stacking and layers/masking.

Quick Reply: Adobe: Lightroom News and Discussion Thread



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 AM.