TS_eXpeed

Only other suggestion for you triod is get rid of the date signature on your photos. lol
Last one isn't bad though.

StreetKA

iTrader: (8)

thanks

StreetKA

iTrader: (8)

TS_eXpeed

Nice!
I think I like your other one a little better though StreetKA.
To my eye, the super tight crop on the backhoe is what's throwing me off. May just be taste though. I'm definitely not one of the super-haas photogs on this board, so take it with a grain of salt.

StreetKA

iTrader: (8)

thanks again...

what about this one ?

stogie1020

^There are too many distracting elements for me and the halo effect seems more pronounced in this one.

StreetKA

iTrader: (8)

TRIOD3SIGNS

haha MAJOR FAIL on my part.... had to have it on there for some pics I took this past weekend(legal court photos....don't ask) but I forgot to take it off

TRIOD3SIGNS

I like

TS_eXpeed

That sucks.

Souljah

My iPhone won't cut it for this thread huh?

srika

of course it can - lets see what you got!

ScottayHiFive

iTrader: (2)

RAW image with chdk on Canon SD790. Post Process with Lightroom*Neat program*

lcrazyaznl

iTrader: (1)

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcrazyaznl/4483062229/" title="Brian's car UA6 teaser by lcrazyaznl, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4018/4483062229_a80590f646_b.jpg" width="1024" height="680" alt="Brian's car UA6 teaser" /></a>

teaser =)

TRIOD3SIGNS

hahahahaha... orange = so much win.

klepto

i saw a shot like this a long time back that was being sold as a canvas print. Decided to mess around and just recreate the shot real quick Just wanted something to hang on the blank wall in my bedroom

I think the title "waiting..." is appropriate

TRIOD3SIGNS

HOLY SMOKES!.... now I see where grain gives a feeling. If you would have over smoothed that out it would have looked like pooh///////.......Beautifull... Could have even given it a bit more grain. In my newb opinion.

is300eater

I remember we had a thread on cell. shots only a long time ago. but I've seen some awesome cell. phone pics here

klepto

oops, I just realized I merely posted a resized version of what I sent to the printers so it's all formatted for print I actually ran a noise filter to reduce the grain cause I had never printed anything that large with that much noise in it. So that pic is after aka "smoothed out" now I wonder what it would have looked if I printed it with the orig grain, oh well I can always change it later

srika

that's right - thanks

srika

where I'm at with processing now. it was an underexposed shot to begin with.

March 2010:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/delobbo/4484840608/
same shot, processed in March 2008:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/delobbo/2378919713/
I've changed my processing techniques just a tad there.

lcrazyaznl

iTrader: (1)

Pretty neat =) takes away from normal and plain shot. Makes me want to fly british airways!

klepto

I think he (srika) means to say that the bottom picture was how he USED to edit his photos and the top "plain" shot is how he currently processes his pics.

I'm all for it srika too many crazy HDR/topaz shots nowadays that hurt the eyes. I'll admit that I used to process some pics like that though

srika

correct, I do currently like "normal and plain". nothing wrong with either, really. tastes just change over time.

JS + XES

iTrader: (1)

srika, just curious, what do you change when you process in order to get an under exposed picture to look like that 2nd picture?

srika

well its a RAW so I had done a single-shot HDR of it with Photomatix, and bumped everything up.

TRIOD3SIGNS

AHA!!!! srika... now I see what you mean.... before, the "IN" thing was to do bold, bright & harsh. I am starting to see your point on how many people have started to see HDR as "burned out".

Kinda like in the graphic design world, where a few years ago, anybody with photoshop wanted to consider themselves a designer. FAIL.
It's back to basics & boundries & rules.... not in a bad way, just a more subtle classy move (to invoke feeling, not just raw unorganized slams of colors & layers)

csmeance

My cousin had to photograph a car so I let him photograph my car in the school parking lot. Just to test and see if the film was loaded I took 2-3 pictures and this magical one came out really good. It's Kodak BN400 film and a camera from 1991 with a standard lense (I believe 50-70):

Sorry for the slight fuzziness and lack of detail, I had to scan the printed photo.

lcrazyaznl

iTrader: (1)

haha whoops i must of read that in the morning the wrong way none the less its a great shot =)

drigo

the last shot i took with the 70-200 f/4 before i got rid of it for the f2.8 version

TommySalami

seems like these are the only things i take pictures of lol

is300eater

^^^

(this was from Vancouver in Feb. Right after I put my camera away in the backpack, a Maserati Granturismo passed by. I kept missing that guy cuz I saw it like every other day )

JLatimer

I got to borrow a 7D. It was nice to try it out. Video is tough with an SLR - beyond difficult. I took a bunch of shots, but this was the one that stood out for me.

mattg

I think that's great

einsatz

Very pretty.

For video, you may want to get some form of harness. I saw this guy during the Kite Festival last week:

wndrlst

That's a lovely shot of your daughter.

EuRTSX

Canon...

wndrlst

Yesss?

EuRTSX

*gets bad thoughts out of my head*

I shall stick with Nikon :P

wndrlst

I wondered if that's where you were going with that!

(Though the 7D seriously rocks. Poor HLL...always mooning over mine...)