Honda: S2000 News
01-21-2004, 09:59 PM
#161
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by 351MachOne
Is anyone here really in the market for a 35k roadster?
Is anyone here really in the market for a 35k roadster?
Right now it's between the S2000 and the 350Z but nothing is out of the question.
01-22-2004, 03:25 PM
#164
Kicking your Ass
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Marietta
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This topic has been discussed on so many forums. The s2k is assed out. Sure you can FI it... But name a car that can't be de-tuned to run boost?
The average joe who buys an s2k wont be willing to take the risk of running a SC. I know there are people who say that it will keep the warranty. Well to them I say, have fun spending 4+k for 40-50 horsepower.
Any more questions?
EDIT: Oh sorry... 6k+, the kit alone is 6000... And from what I have heard, 100hp at wheel increase is not happening. Im gonna go peruse the s2k forum and see if anything has changed.
01-22-2004, 03:33 PM
#165
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by 351MachOne
No, I wont. i know about comptech... They run low boost and make very little power improvement. I think the model that I saw tested was still running high 13's...
This topic has been discussed on so many forums. The s2k is assed out. Sure you can FI it... But name a car that can't be de-tuned to run boost?
The average joe who buys an s2k wont be willing to take the risk of running a SC. I know there are people who say that it will keep the warranty. Well to them I say, have fun spending 4+k for 40-50 horsepower.
Any more questions?
No, I wont. i know about comptech... They run low boost and make very little power improvement. I think the model that I saw tested was still running high 13's...
This topic has been discussed on so many forums. The s2k is assed out. Sure you can FI it... But name a car that can't be de-tuned to run boost?
The average joe who buys an s2k wont be willing to take the risk of running a SC. I know there are people who say that it will keep the warranty. Well to them I say, have fun spending 4+k for 40-50 horsepower.
Any more questions?
This is a car that's designed to compete with the Z3/Z4, Boxster, SLK, etc. It's a fast car for its class and for a damn good price. This class is aimed at a buyer that generally doesn't look to make their car a 12 second car. This class is generally for a buyer that wants to have some fun with a car stock. IMHO
01-22-2004, 08:23 PM
#166
Kicking your Ass
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Marietta
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by AcuraFan
I have a question. Why can't someone just buy a nice S2000 and enjoy it as the quick, great handling car it is without someone saying "poo on you, that car is stupid-slow and no better than a Miata"?
This is a car that's designed to compete with the Z3/Z4, Boxster, SLK, etc. It's a fast car for its class and for a damn good price. This class is aimed at a buyer that generally doesn't look to make their car a 12 second car. This class is generally for a buyer that wants to have some fun with a car stock. IMHO
I have a question. Why can't someone just buy a nice S2000 and enjoy it as the quick, great handling car it is without someone saying "poo on you, that car is stupid-slow and no better than a Miata"?
This is a car that's designed to compete with the Z3/Z4, Boxster, SLK, etc. It's a fast car for its class and for a damn good price. This class is aimed at a buyer that generally doesn't look to make their car a 12 second car. This class is generally for a buyer that wants to have some fun with a car stock. IMHO
I have never gone and told an s2k owner that he was dumb and then shit on his car... That is just ignorant. I said, IMO that the power is in the stratosphere and the numbers speak more for the car than the performance. (This is typical)
Again, my original comment was NOT an attack on the s2k. It was a comment that I made in passing. And now it has turned into this... If I had thought that someone here was this infatuated with the car that my opinion would've started this mess, I wouldn't have made it. Well I might have made it if this was the s2k forum and I was looking to troll around...
Every car is designed to do it's service stock. When you get a 'performance' car people are rarely ever satisfied. The mod bug will grip you, it always does... You'll want to handle better than the s2k infront of you... you'll want to make the s2k behind you be FURTHER behind you.. It's bragging rights.
The same thing applies to almost any enthusiast (car) market. 4wheeling, dragging, auto-x, road course. The only car I would leave stock is a McLaren F1.
That is a another bag of worms though.
01-22-2004, 08:28 PM
#167
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by 351MachOne
I never shit on an s2000. I said I kinda liked it, and if they changed it it would be a travesty. And I never said it was no better than a Miata. Like I said before, I am not bashing an s2000. I was complaining about it's useable and practical power. I know that doesnt matter to people, and I understand it. I love roadsters, I know where those people are coming from. I also know a thing or two about usable power, considering that my first two gears are COMPLETELY useless in anything less than 40 degree weather. I'd kill for an s2k right now... at least I could floor the gas =).
I have never gone and told an s2k owner that he was dumb and then shit on his car... That is just ignorant. I said, IMO that the power is in the stratosphere and the numbers speak more for the car than the performance. (This is typical)
Again, my original comment was NOT an attack on the s2k. It was a comment that I made in passing. And now it has turned into this... If I had thought that someone here was this infatuated with the car that my opinion would've started this mess, I wouldn't have made it. Well I might have made it if this was the s2k forum and I was looking to troll around...
Every car is designed to do it's service stock. When you get a 'performance' car people are rarely ever satisfied. The mod bug will grip you, it always does... You'll want to handle better than the s2k infront of you... you'll want to make the s2k behind you be FURTHER behind you.. It's bragging rights.
The same thing applies to almost any enthusiast (car) market. 4wheeling, dragging, auto-x, road course. The only car I would leave stock is a McLaren F1.
That is a another bag of worms though.
I never shit on an s2000. I said I kinda liked it, and if they changed it it would be a travesty. And I never said it was no better than a Miata. Like I said before, I am not bashing an s2000. I was complaining about it's useable and practical power. I know that doesnt matter to people, and I understand it. I love roadsters, I know where those people are coming from. I also know a thing or two about usable power, considering that my first two gears are COMPLETELY useless in anything less than 40 degree weather. I'd kill for an s2k right now... at least I could floor the gas =).
I have never gone and told an s2k owner that he was dumb and then shit on his car... That is just ignorant. I said, IMO that the power is in the stratosphere and the numbers speak more for the car than the performance. (This is typical)
Again, my original comment was NOT an attack on the s2k. It was a comment that I made in passing. And now it has turned into this... If I had thought that someone here was this infatuated with the car that my opinion would've started this mess, I wouldn't have made it. Well I might have made it if this was the s2k forum and I was looking to troll around...
Every car is designed to do it's service stock. When you get a 'performance' car people are rarely ever satisfied. The mod bug will grip you, it always does... You'll want to handle better than the s2k infront of you... you'll want to make the s2k behind you be FURTHER behind you.. It's bragging rights.
The same thing applies to almost any enthusiast (car) market. 4wheeling, dragging, auto-x, road course. The only car I would leave stock is a McLaren F1.
That is a another bag of worms though.
01-23-2004, 12:52 PM
#168
Kicking your Ass
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Marietta
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by AcuraFan
I'm sorry this got out of hand. Truce?
I'm sorry this got out of hand. Truce?
-Sam
12-31-2005, 04:18 PM
#172
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 39
Posts: 63,178
Received 2,773 Likes
on
1,976 Posts
eww... no thanks
when is the last year for the current S2000? i better pick one up before then..
when is the last year for the current S2000? i better pick one up before then..
12-31-2005, 06:44 PM
#175
Chloe @ 17mo
Originally Posted by gavriil
12-31-2005, 08:41 PM
#177
To punish and enslave
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Age: 34
Posts: 2,833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gavriil
and start 
if the S2000 goes front engine, front-wheel drive. I hope that is not it.
12-31-2005, 09:23 PM
#178
That was uncalled for...
Id be very dissapointed if the S2000 goes to that car...that thing does not look like a sports car...It looks like a very cool car, but as I mentioned above, it shouldnt be the next S2k
01-01-2006, 01:08 AM
#179
Senior Moderator
01-01-2006, 01:23 AM
#180
Senior Moderator
wtf.... pinch me.
01-01-2006, 03:20 AM
#181
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by srika
wtf.... pinch me.
01-01-2006, 05:41 AM
#182
Senior Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,634
Received 2,328 Likes
on
1,308 Posts
NOT the S2000, its something else. Maybe a Honda Beat or something similar 
01-01-2006, 12:40 PM
#184
Moderator Alumnus
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by TL CHROMETIDE
I just noticed something, under S2000, it says FF. I will be very and start if the S2000 goes front engine, front-wheel drive. I hope that is not it.
and start if the S2000 goes front engine, front-wheel drive. I hope that is not it.
01-01-2006, 01:37 PM
#186
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Yumchah
Sure. Where?
01-01-2006, 02:38 PM
#188
Originally Posted by gavriil
I think that's the sports 4 concept (next gen JDM Accord/TSX), hence the FF platform. I think the article is just referencing the S2000 as in inspired by the S2000 or something (also mentions the RX8 - 4 door sports car), not saying it's a S2000 replacement.
01-01-2006, 05:51 PM
#189
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by srika
umm... it's a figure of speech, at least here in the US.
01-02-2006, 12:44 AM
#190
Drifting
Originally Posted by supraken
I think that's the sports 4 concept (next gen JDM Accord/TSX), hence the FF platform. I think the article is just referencing the S2000 as in inspired by the S2000 or something (also mentions the RX8 - 4 door sports car), not saying it's a S2000 replacement.
the picture of the four door FF concept, is the future JDMAccord/TSX, just like he said. the future s2000 will look way different from that.
01-02-2006, 02:10 AM
#191
Senior Moderator
ok so can the thread title be changed? I really don't think this is a CGI of the next S2000... quite frankly I don't know what the title would be changed to - just not what it says right now. maybe something like:
Next Gen. Honda S2000 News **CGI of a 4-door Honda concept car (page 2)**
maybe something like:Next Gen. Honda S2000 News **CGI of a 4-door Honda concept car (page 2)**
01-02-2006, 01:58 PM
#193
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not sure if ya'll got someone to translate that little blurb for the sedan but from what i can tell it says something to the effect that this is Honda's 4-door sports sedan. Something something that has the S2000 engine.
Kind of like the 4-door concept that will be making the rounds as Acura's next-gen TSX...which has also been rumored to have the S2000 engine.
I would think the convertible Honda on the cover of the mag was more the next gen S2000.
Kind of like the 4-door concept that will be making the rounds as Acura's next-gen TSX...which has also been rumored to have the S2000 engine.
I would think the convertible Honda on the cover of the mag was more the next gen S2000.
Last edited by BuddySol; 01-02-2006 at 02:02 PM.
01-02-2006, 02:35 PM
#194
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why won't they use a V6 for their next gen sports sedan? Even if it is the S2000 engine, it would still be underpowered compared to the competition.
It clearly showed in the latest C&D where the Accord V6 6-speed ran 0-60 in 5.9 seconds versus the TSX 6-speed's time of 7.2 seconds and the Accord beat or tied the TSX in most categories (lane change, skidpad, etc). It shows how important a good engine is, as the Accord weighs considerably more and has a "softer" or non sport suspension yet performs better.
It clearly showed in the latest C&D where the Accord V6 6-speed ran 0-60 in 5.9 seconds versus the TSX 6-speed's time of 7.2 seconds and the Accord beat or tied the TSX in most categories (lane change, skidpad, etc). It shows how important a good engine is, as the Accord weighs considerably more and has a "softer" or non sport suspension yet performs better.
01-02-2006, 10:27 PM
#195
Pro
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: San Francisco
Age: 41
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BuddySol
...
Kind of like the 4-door concept that will be making the rounds as Acura's next-gen TSX...which has also been rumored to have the S2000 engine.
...
01-03-2006, 12:16 AM
#196
Instructor
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vancouver BC Canada
Age: 49
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by cusdaddy
Why won't they use a V6 for their next gen sports sedan? Even if it is the S2000 engine, it would still be underpowered compared to the competition.
It clearly showed in the latest C&D where the Accord V6 6-speed ran 0-60 in 5.9 seconds versus the TSX 6-speed's time of 7.2 seconds and the Accord beat or tied the TSX in most categories (lane change, skidpad, etc). It shows how important a good engine is, as the Accord weighs considerably more and has a "softer" or non sport suspension yet performs better.
It clearly showed in the latest C&D where the Accord V6 6-speed ran 0-60 in 5.9 seconds versus the TSX 6-speed's time of 7.2 seconds and the Accord beat or tied the TSX in most categories (lane change, skidpad, etc). It shows how important a good engine is, as the Accord weighs considerably more and has a "softer" or non sport suspension yet performs better.
The new JDM Accord/TSX will be very likely be an 2.0 liter DFI (direct fuel injection) with sh-awd for the top of the line model. 250-270 hps
01-03-2006, 11:54 AM
#197
Moderator Alumnus
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
ok so can the thread title be changed? I really don't think this is a CGI of the next S2000... quite frankly I don't know what the title would be changed to - just not what it says right now. maybe something like:
Next Gen. Honda S2000 News **CGI of a 4-door Honda concept car (page 2)**
maybe something like:Next Gen. Honda S2000 News **CGI of a 4-door Honda concept car (page 2)**
It says S2000 on top of that article.
01-03-2006, 05:24 PM
#198
Got Ramen?
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Irvine, CA
Age: 40
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gavriil
the front emblem is nto even centered.
01-03-2006, 10:53 PM
#200
Intermediate
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Memphis, TN, USA
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TypeRS
no one notices that this horrible chop is based off the euro civic hatch??
the front emblem is nto even centered.
the front emblem is nto even centered.
I don't really see the production version of this keeping that lighting treatment.