Honda: CR-V News
06-13-2006, 11:59 AM
#82
Race Director
I'm surprised this stuff hasn't come out sooner - these things should be coming of the assembly line next to the RDX within a couple of months.
Looks good - by this time next year when gas is approaching $4/gal, a 30+MPG SUV (CRV diesel) would sell real well.
Looks good - by this time next year when gas is approaching $4/gal, a 30+MPG SUV (CRV diesel) would sell real well.
06-13-2006, 01:38 PM
#83
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by dom
From all preliminary info, nope just the 2.4 and the possibility of the 2.2L deisel down the road.
Again Honda is playing catch up.
Again Honda is playing catch up.
While the other kids have moved up to Twister, Honda is still trying to master the intricacies of Chutes and Ladders.
06-13-2006, 01:44 PM
#84
Instructor
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Now in Denver
Age: 56
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mrdeeno
Nahh, i don't think Honda is playing at all.
While the other kids have moved up to Twister, Honda is still trying to master the intricacies of Chutes and Ladders.
While the other kids have moved up to Twister, Honda is still trying to master the intricacies of Chutes and Ladders.
When the realworld mileage on the v6 rav is coming back at 17-20 by most of the reviewers the V6 doesn't seem quite as hot. this class is all about mileage.
06-13-2006, 01:50 PM
#85
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Stevens24
Maybe someday Nissan will enter this class
When the realworld mileage on the v6 rav is coming back at 17-20 by most of the reviewers the V6 doesn't seem quite as hot. this class is all about mileage.
When the realworld mileage on the v6 rav is coming back at 17-20 by most of the reviewers the V6 doesn't seem quite as hot. this class is all about mileage.
We get the X-Trail in Canada and apparently the next gen will be US bound as well.
I don't see the need for a 3.5L in the CRV but the 3.0L from the Accord would have fit nicely IMO. 10-15% of sales is better than having that customer go over to Toyota.
06-13-2006, 02:03 PM
#86
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Stevens24
Maybe someday Nissan will enter this class
When the realworld mileage on the v6 rav is coming back at 17-20 by most of the reviewers the V6 doesn't seem quite as hot. this class is all about mileage.
When the realworld mileage on the v6 rav is coming back at 17-20 by most of the reviewers the V6 doesn't seem quite as hot. this class is all about mileage.
Uhh, they already are...it's called the Xterra.
In this class (in the U.S.), the compact and small-Midsize SUVs are:
Rav4
CR-V/Element
Xterra
CX-7
Escape/Tribute/Mariner
Liberty
Tuscon
Sportage
They all offer V6 engines (optional or standard), except the CR-V/Element and CX-7. but the CX-7 has a turbo.
I guess Honda's got at least one other company to play Chutes and Ladders with.
06-13-2006, 02:13 PM
#87
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by mrdeeno
Uhh, they already are...it's called the Xterra.
In this class (in the U.S.), the compact and small-Midsize SUVs are:
Rav4
CR-V/Element
Xterra
CX-7
Escape/Tribute/Mariner
Liberty
Tuscon
Sportage
They all offer V6 engines (optional or standard), except the CR-V/Element and CX-7. but the CX-7 has a turbo.
In this class (in the U.S.), the compact and small-Midsize SUVs are:
Rav4
CR-V/Element
Xterra
CX-7
Escape/Tribute/Mariner
Liberty
Tuscon
Sportage
They all offer V6 engines (optional or standard), except the CR-V/Element and CX-7. but the CX-7 has a turbo.
06-13-2006, 02:16 PM
#88
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by mrdeeno
Uhh, they already are...it's called the Xterra.
In this class (in the U.S.), the compact and small-Midsize SUVs are:
Rav4
CR-V/Element
Xterra
CX-7
Escape/Tribute/Mariner
Liberty
Tuscon
Sportage
They all offer V6 engines (optional or standard), except the CR-V/Element and CX-7. but the CX-7 has a turbo.
I guess Honda's got at least one other company to play Chutes and Ladders with.
In this class (in the U.S.), the compact and small-Midsize SUVs are:
Rav4
CR-V/Element
Xterra
CX-7
Escape/Tribute/Mariner
Liberty
Tuscon
Sportage
They all offer V6 engines (optional or standard), except the CR-V/Element and CX-7. but the CX-7 has a turbo.
I guess Honda's got at least one other company to play Chutes and Ladders with.
And I personally don't consider the Xterra competition for the CRV. Probly because its about 5-8k more up here.
06-13-2006, 02:30 PM
#89
Senior Moderator
Yes, stateside the CRV MSRPs between $20,395 (LX) - $25,450 (SE) where the Xterra MSRPs between $20,050 (X) - $27,750 (SE).
06-13-2006, 02:38 PM
#90
It does look smaller, probably going back to the original size of the 1st gen. I don't think that's a bad thing; the current CR-V has gotten too big IMO.
06-13-2006, 03:23 PM
#91
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by dom
You forgot Outlander, Equinox and Torrent.
And I personally don't consider the Xterra competition for the CRV. Probly because its about 5-8k more up here.
And I personally don't consider the Xterra competition for the CRV. Probly because its about 5-8k more up here.
06-13-2006, 04:51 PM
#92
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by mrdeeno
Blame Canada...
06-13-2006, 06:25 PM
#93
Pro
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: San Francisco
Age: 41
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
By looking at the specs, the next gen CR-V isnt really that different with respect to dimensions.
The 07 wheelbase is 1" longer, and the width is about 3" wider. The length is .3" "shorter". I believe though, that the previous measurement (for years 02-06) includes the rear mounted spare in its length calculation. If this is true, the new CR-V is actually longer than the previous iteration.
In terms of cargo space, the new CR-V will lose around 11 cubic feet (61 cu. ft instead of 72). The interior passenger volume is similar to the 2nd gen; I dont have any specifics though.
The biggest difference is weight. The 07 CR-V 4WD EX is supposed to weigh ~250 pounds more. However, the engine is supposedly going to be slightly stronger. Also, it has been stated that the new CR-V will be "sportier".
The 07 wheelbase is 1" longer, and the width is about 3" wider. The length is .3" "shorter". I believe though, that the previous measurement (for years 02-06) includes the rear mounted spare in its length calculation. If this is true, the new CR-V is actually longer than the previous iteration.
In terms of cargo space, the new CR-V will lose around 11 cubic feet (61 cu. ft instead of 72). The interior passenger volume is similar to the 2nd gen; I dont have any specifics though.
The biggest difference is weight. The 07 CR-V 4WD EX is supposed to weigh ~250 pounds more. However, the engine is supposedly going to be slightly stronger. Also, it has been stated that the new CR-V will be "sportier".
06-15-2006, 02:46 PM
#95
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Motohip
Ewww, it looks like a Nissan Quest with it's roundness. 
06-15-2006, 03:10 PM
#96
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver
Age: 48
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
We get the X-Trail in Canada and apparently the next gen will be US bound as well.
I don't see the need for a 3.5L in the CRV but the 3.0L from the Accord would have fit nicely IMO. 10-15% of sales is better than having that customer go over to Toyota.
I don't see the need for a 3.5L in the CRV but the 3.0L from the Accord would have fit nicely IMO. 10-15% of sales is better than having that customer go over to Toyota.
06-15-2006, 03:20 PM
#97
Senior Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,634
Received 2,328 Likes
on
1,308 Posts
Originally Posted by F23A4
Dear god..
that c pillar does not flow with the lines of the car and the front treatment doesnt need any comment.
06-29-2006, 12:58 PM
#103
Photography Nerd
Originally Posted by Infamous425
they really should've squared off the rear quarter window
I think that's the most distracting element. It also must restrict visibilty when you're reversing into a spot...
06-29-2006, 01:21 PM
#105
Race Director
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 44
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why does Honda like those kind of headlights? First on the US Accord and now on the CRV, if you're listening Honda, "the shape of the headlights are bloody awful"!!!
Ugly, just plain ugly you hear!
The saddest part is this car will still sell because of the Honda record of "reliability".
Ugly, just plain ugly you hear!
The saddest part is this car will still sell because of the Honda record of "reliability".
06-29-2006, 03:45 PM
#108
I agree, I don't even find the front end that offensive now that the wraps are off. But the rear glass is horrible.
06-29-2006, 03:57 PM
#109
The sizzle in the Steak
meh..
06-29-2006, 07:29 PM
#110
Safety Car
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: philly
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Definately nowhere near hot or sporty, chick looking minivanish, yes. I thought about the next CRV as possible future vehicle being it would be similiar to what it is now with 180hp, but not looking like this exterior wise. Reminds me of the mb r-class but worse. Maybe thats the look they wanted.
06-30-2006, 04:35 PM
#120
Got da Internet Goin Nutz
OK, I am looking at this from a CRV history standpoint. From model 1 to now, that thing is A FUCKING EXCELLENT IMPROVEMENT!
Now if your just looking at it from a what's in front of you standpoint, I understand the previous negative comments.
Now if your just looking at it from a what's in front of you standpoint, I understand the previous negative comments.