Audi: Development and Technology News
#121
2G TLX-S
Originally Posted by Maximized
Audi had Quattro years before Acura was a brand.
#123
2G TLX-S
Or may be "Occasionally follow".
#125
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
Super handling always sounded like something an 8 year old would say.
#126
2G TLX-S
Originally Posted by Maximized
It's not like Acura desinged and built this technology; Borg Warner did.
(2) Acura is the world's first auto maker to apply this technology into not just one, but several of its mass production car model lines.
#127
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 43
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
(1) So Borg Warner did, Audi still "follows".
(2) Acura is the world's first auto maker to apply this technology into not just one, but several of its mass production car model lines.
(2) Acura is the world's first auto maker to apply this technology into not just one, but several of its mass production car model lines.
I don't think Audi is looking over their shoulders at Acura.
#128
Honda Fanboy
Originally Posted by Maximized
I don't think Audi is looking over their shoulders at Acura.
Borg co-developed SH-AWD with Honda. SH-AWD wouldn't exist without the cooperation of both companies. Clearly, the idea of SH-AWD was thought of by Honda but they went to BW for the engineering assistance. There is no innovation with this technology on Audi's part. They are introducing the same technology as Acura. It would have been nicer if Audi could have done the SH-AWD with something else innovative to add to the mix but it is essentially the same thing.
#129
101 years of heartache...
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago's North Side/Champaign, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Guys, regardless of whether Honda came out with this stuff first, recent designs have been "inspired" by others. Take a look at the TSX and TL, for example. Clear resemblances to Fiat. All I'm saying is that in order to stay competative, you need to do a better impression of the same segment than the competition.
And copying is the most sincere form of flattering.
And copying is the most sincere form of flattering.
#130
Senior Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,634
Received 2,328 Likes
on
1,308 Posts
Originally Posted by gocubsgo55
Guys, regardless of whether Honda came out with this stuff first, recent designs have been "inspired" by others. Take a look at the TSX and TL, for example. Clear resemblances to Fiat. All I'm saying is that in order to stay competative, you need to do a better impression of the same segment than the competition.
And copying is the most sincere form of flattering.
And copying is the most sincere form of flattering.
#131
Race Director
Originally Posted by Maximized
I don't think Audi is looking over their shoulders at Acura.
#134
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Crazy Sellout
I dont see whats so wrong about this. At least audi will know how to market it way better.
I don't see a problem with it either. I think its great that the technology spreads. That means it works. Acura should be credited with being the first to bring it to market.
Instead we yet again have to find ways to discredit Acura and praise the competition.
#135
Originally Posted by Crazy Sellout
I dont see whats so wrong about this. At least audi will know how to market it way better.
#136
Senior Moderator
.....maybe Acura should return Audi's flattery by putting SH-AWD in their high end (hopefully much higher powered) models "such as a performance Type S and Type R variant of its TSX, TL and RL."
#138
2G TLX-S
Originally Posted by Maximized
You are taking the slogan literally. Who cares?
Last edited by Edward'TLS; 01-16-2007 at 08:19 PM.
#139
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 43
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
But not when Audi is spending hundreds of millions of marketing dollar promoting this slogan, and now getting laughed at. Just like Ford now no longer promotes the "Quality is job 1" slogan.
#140
Honda Fanboy
Originally Posted by Maximized
Again, who cares? It's just a marketing slogan. Acura uses "Advance". Acura's cars are far from advanced when it comes to the competition.
In 2003 when the 3rd generation TL went on sale, what cars had Bluetooth technology? Acura had it standard in the TL before the S-class or even 7-Series had it as an option. Bluetooth may not seem like a big deal, but look where it is now compared to 2003. Not to mention that it has standard bi-xenons, surround-sound DVD-A audio etc... Most importanly, aside for the VERY limited number of high-end cars that offered some of these features, what car in the same class as the TL offered these as standard, let alone even an option? To me, that would sound like an "Advanced" car.
What about the 2005 RL. SH-AWD, real-time traffic, noise cancellation, etc...
Acura offers some awesome technology. They just need to learn how to market it. What does the majority of the competition have over Acura that is so much more advanced? Keep in mind that competition means cars of the same class, not a Maybach vs. TSX.
#142
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Animagix
Audi's quattro system died when they retired from rallying.
I tend to agree but Audi has still been able to market quattro system using the rally history. Goes along with the prestige of ownership which of course helps sales. IMO
Most of you guys are looking into this way too much. BMW says they are the ultimate driving machine but im pretty sure a Z06 would be more ultimate than a X3....
#143
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (1)
BMW have lost its soul. Audi? never liked it now, the designs look bored and old.
This is really a good timing for Japanese auto makers to step in and beat Europeans.
I think the next TSX should be equipped with "real" luxurious stuff if they really want to compete in Luxury Car League, Lexus and Infiniti have done it, now its Acura's turn.
This is really a good timing for Japanese auto makers to step in and beat Europeans.
I think the next TSX should be equipped with "real" luxurious stuff if they really want to compete in Luxury Car League, Lexus and Infiniti have done it, now its Acura's turn.
#144
I used to own an audi a4. While the build quality felt solid as a brick and handled great... reliability is still a major issue with the majority of german cars. I used to pray on a weekly basis that nothing went wrong because i dread visiting the stealership.
After that 5 year experience with a german (also hearing lots of other horror stories from other owners) I went back to japanese cars. My Rx8, surprisingly had 0 issues in the two years of ownership. Go figure, a car with an engine known to blow apex seals and such held up really well under lots of pressure.
After that 5 year experience with a german (also hearing lots of other horror stories from other owners) I went back to japanese cars. My Rx8, surprisingly had 0 issues in the two years of ownership. Go figure, a car with an engine known to blow apex seals and such held up really well under lots of pressure.
#145
Originally Posted by Crazy Sellout
Most of you guys are looking into this way too much. BMW says they are the ultimate driving machine but im pretty sure a Z06 would be more ultimate than a X3....
#146
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Crazy Sellout
I tend to agree but Audi has still been able to market quattro system using the rally history. Goes along with the prestige of ownership which of course helps sales. IMO
Most of you guys are looking into this way too much. BMW says they are the ultimate driving machine but im pretty sure a Z06 would be more ultimate than a X3....
Most of you guys are looking into this way too much. BMW says they are the ultimate driving machine but im pretty sure a Z06 would be more ultimate than a X3....
Audi uses "rally history" to market it's quattro system because there is an obvious relationship between its rally history experience and it's current AWD system.
Just like how Honda uses it's history in motorsports to market it's vehicles, because there is an obvious relationship between F1 cars/V8 engines experience and front heavy FWD sedans, econo cars, SUVs, robots, and jet engines.
#147
2G TLX-S
Originally Posted by Maximized
Again, who cares? It's just a marketing slogan. Acura uses "Advance". Acura's cars are far from advanced when it comes to the competition.
In this technologically advanced auto world, one day auto maker X is the leader, but next day it could be Y. So when one auto maker has the gut to spent hundreds of millions of $$$ to market the "Never follows" slogan, it should not follow others, or become a stupid laughing stock.
#148
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 43
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
You still don't get it. Acura use "Advance" but not "Most advance" because it leaves itself room to back down. Acura may not be the most advance comparing with the competitions, but it is ADVANCE (other posts have already listed all the first-in-class advance features), adhering to its marketing slogan.
In this technologically advanced auto world, one day auto maker X is the leader, but next day it could be Y. So when one auto maker has the gut to spent hundreds of millions of $$$ to market the "Never follows" slogan, it should not follow others, or become a stupid laughing stock.
In this technologically advanced auto world, one day auto maker X is the leader, but next day it could be Y. So when one auto maker has the gut to spent hundreds of millions of $$$ to market the "Never follows" slogan, it should not follow others, or become a stupid laughing stock.
You have way too much time on your hands....
#149
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
You still don't get it. Acura use "Advance" but not "Most advance" because it leaves itself room to back down. Acura may not be the most advance comparing with the competitions, but it is ADVANCE (other posts have already listed all the first-in-class advance features), adhering to its marketing slogan.
In this technologically advanced auto world, one day auto maker X is the leader, but next day it could be Y. So when one auto maker has the gut to spent hundreds of millions of $$$ to market the "Never follows" slogan, it should not follow others, or become a stupid laughing stock.
In this technologically advanced auto world, one day auto maker X is the leader, but next day it could be Y. So when one auto maker has the gut to spent hundreds of millions of $$$ to market the "Never follows" slogan, it should not follow others, or become a stupid laughing stock.
True, no one laughs at the name "Super Handling awd"
#150
Senior Moderator
^ speaking of which. Like SH-AWD name, the general public will not even notice that Audi is using the same technology as Acura. From what i can tell most people wouldnt even know what SH-AWD even stands for.
So it really doesnt matter. Laugh it up because it wont matter in sales.
So it really doesnt matter. Laugh it up because it wont matter in sales.
#151
Originally Posted by Crazy Sellout
From what i can tell most people wouldnt even know what SH-AWD even stands for.
#152
Senior Moderator
...I think the reaction would be more like
Too bad the 'SH' designation did little for Prelude and RL sales.
Too bad the 'SH' designation did little for Prelude and RL sales.
#153
Pro
'SH' doesn't do much because
1) it's not applied across all Acura cars
2) the cars that have it haven't hit the right market segment (targeted people who buy RL generally won't care too much about handling)
3) it doesn't show up in measurable outcomes, for example 0-60 time
If 'SH' came out on a hot rod version of TL or TSX, or on a sub NSX level type of coupe, it could have been totally different. Acura's business planning people aren't researching the market or listening very hard.
1) it's not applied across all Acura cars
2) the cars that have it haven't hit the right market segment (targeted people who buy RL generally won't care too much about handling)
3) it doesn't show up in measurable outcomes, for example 0-60 time
If 'SH' came out on a hot rod version of TL or TSX, or on a sub NSX level type of coupe, it could have been totally different. Acura's business planning people aren't researching the market or listening very hard.
#154
Race Director
Originally Posted by TMQ
'SH' doesn't do much because
1) it's not applied across all Acura cars
.
1) it's not applied across all Acura cars
.
#155
Originally Posted by biker
I think the plan is to do just that and make Acura into a reliable Audi (with SH-AWD replacing Quatro).
Audi announced a few days ago they are the first again to develop full LED headlights on a production car. Which in the future will make xenons a thing of the past....Once again "lead never follow".
This whole argument about slogans is funny as they are just marketing tools but at least the "the ultimate driving machine" and "lead never follow" slogans have lived up to and past the test of time....What is Acuras slogan again this week?.."true definition of luxury" "Precision crafted performance"..no its "Advance". oh well it doesnt really matter as it will probably change again in the spring.
Last edited by cp3117; 01-19-2007 at 02:49 PM.
#156
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by biker
I think the plan is to do just that and make Acura into a reliable Audi (with SH-AWD replacing Quatro).
#157
2G TLX-S
Originally Posted by F23A4
.....just hope they can massage the 'Type S' models into their version of Audi's S/RS lineup.
#158
Originally Posted by VTEC Racer
Acura stole the technology from Mitsubishi? Please prove me wrong as even the article above says that Acura is the ONLY manufacturer that offers this technology. It is a WORLD FIRST. You can't be first at something if someone else already does it.
Acura: "Torque vectoring takes all-wheel drive to another level by varying drive torque not just between front and rear axles but also between wheels on the same axle."
EVO: "Active Yaw Control, first incorporated into the Evo IV, was developed by Mitsubishi to improve a vehicle's cornering and acceleration performance, and consequently its safety, under a wide range of operating conditions.
This is achieved by utilising a torque transfer differential which is controlled by various sensors and an electronic control unit (ECU) to enable a difference in torque to go to each of the rear wheels. "
Its the same thing, different names. You're proved wrong.
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
They did not steal it from Mitsubishi, nor has Mitsubishi made such a system.
Originally Posted by dom
.
#159
Honda Fanboy
Originally Posted by heyitsme
Since when are cars articles always 100% correct.
Acura: "Torque vectoring takes all-wheel drive to another level by varying drive torque not just between front and rear axles but also between wheels on the same axle."
EVO: "Active Yaw Control, first incorporated into the Evo IV, was developed by Mitsubishi to improve a vehicle's cornering and acceleration performance, and consequently its safety, under a wide range of operating conditions.
This is achieved by utilising a torque transfer differential which is controlled by various sensors and an electronic control unit (ECU) to enable a difference in torque to go to each of the rear wheels. "
Its the same thing, different names. You're proved wrong.
See above and I found it funny he used the term "steal" so I used it, like other companies aren't able to develop new technology which other companies already have.
I see a roll eyes when Acura is mentioned as stealing but not when Audi is?
.
Acura: "Torque vectoring takes all-wheel drive to another level by varying drive torque not just between front and rear axles but also between wheels on the same axle."
EVO: "Active Yaw Control, first incorporated into the Evo IV, was developed by Mitsubishi to improve a vehicle's cornering and acceleration performance, and consequently its safety, under a wide range of operating conditions.
This is achieved by utilising a torque transfer differential which is controlled by various sensors and an electronic control unit (ECU) to enable a difference in torque to go to each of the rear wheels. "
Its the same thing, different names. You're proved wrong.
See above and I found it funny he used the term "steal" so I used it, like other companies aren't able to develop new technology which other companies already have.
I see a roll eyes when Acura is mentioned as stealing but not when Audi is?
.
"Acura owns Mitsubishi."
You're proved wrong.
Give me some REAL facts with support, not your middle-school stuff.
Yes, magazines can be wrong, but not when EVERY SINGLE MAGAZINE says that Acura's technology is a world-first.
#160
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 43
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by VTEC Racer
Sorry, you haven't proved me wrong in anyway. I can type a bunch of stuff and put quotes around it also.
"Acura owns Mitsubishi."
You're proved wrong.
Give me some REAL facts with support, not your middle-school stuff.
Yes, magazines can be wrong, but not when EVERY SINGLE MAGAZINE says that Acura's technology is a world-first.
"Acura owns Mitsubishi."
You're proved wrong.
Give me some REAL facts with support, not your middle-school stuff.
Yes, magazines can be wrong, but not when EVERY SINGLE MAGAZINE says that Acura's technology is a world-first.
"SAYC (Super Active Yaw Control) is a computerized system that varies the ACD (Active Centre Differential) and provides dynamic amounts of power to each wheel. A natural instinct is to correct oversteer in any car. With the Evo, the computer takes care of it, you can feel the back end stepping out but, the Evo corrects it for you and thanks you for your meagre attempt to throw it out of control. Switch the ACD to the ‘Gravel’ setting and be prepared to be amazed. Drop the back end out on a dirt road and add power, with ease, the SAYC manages to help you out significantly, it’s simply astonishing."