J37 Build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-30-2016, 01:57 PM
  #1  
Derek
Thread Starter
 
SykVSyx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Age: 51
Posts: 560
Received 143 Likes on 104 Posts
J37 Build

Figure I would just start a thread about and see what I find out.

Plan is to build a J37 using the J35a3 motor.

Here is what is I was going to do:

port the heads/IM/headers
08 TL-S cams(or Bisi cams, if someone can offer advice on the Stage 1/1.2/2 cams?)
08 TL-S valve springs
2013 MDX Crank, Rods, Pistons, Bearings
90mm Mustang Throttle Body
bore block to 90mm

About the bearings, the acura parts website I was on listed several different ones(different colours) and I wasn't sure how that all works. Can someone confirm EXACTLY how many/what colour bearings I should get, please?

fsttyms suggested I contact KMS about getting a block guard for the cylinders. Waiting to hear back from them about that.

Appreciate any help/advice/suggestions.
Old 05-01-2016, 03:44 PM
  #2  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Bearings are by color. You need the block and crank and rods to know what bearings to choose. On the block crank and rods there are Letters and numbers stamped on them. Honda/Acura has a chart that you cross reference the number/letter from the block/crank or crank/rod to find the color bearing you are supposed to use (its also a good idea to plastigauge them to double check that they are within range.

These arent for the Jseries specifically but you get the idea






The following users liked this post:
SykVSyx (05-03-2016)
Old 05-02-2016, 07:54 AM
  #3  
Derek
Thread Starter
 
SykVSyx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Age: 51
Posts: 560
Received 143 Likes on 104 Posts
Ok, thank you, very helpful info.

Ok, so, just let Acura tell me which bearings when I order the crank/rods, since the block is a J35 block.

Awesome, much appreciated.

Anyone have any feedback on the Bisi cams?

Would really like to know if the Stage 1/1.2 or Stage 2 cams are something to seriously consider.

Been having various opinions about Bisi as well, but, things may have changed, so, any feedback would be great.

Last edited by SykVSyx; 05-02-2016 at 07:57 AM.
Old 05-02-2016, 08:51 AM
  #4  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
No. They wont be able to tell you. You have to order the crank and rods FIRST. Once you get them you can cross reference the crank and block codes, and the crank and rod codes. THEN you have to go back to the acura dealer and order the required bearings. The dealer wont know the codes on any of the parts till they arrive. They also dont know the codes on the block as every block is different.
Old 05-02-2016, 09:01 AM
  #5  
Derek
Thread Starter
 
SykVSyx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Age: 51
Posts: 560
Received 143 Likes on 104 Posts
Ah ok, little bit more of a drawn out process.

Sucks, because I have to order the parts from the US, pick them up and then order more again, and pick them up.

Oh well, part of the modding process, I guess.

Was also considering pickup up a used '13 MDX engine, it has 57k on it for $2500.

Thought that would be a bit of a waste though, because of all the parts I wouldn't be using from it.

Haven't priced out the crank/rods/pistons prices yet, but, I think it may actually be almost near that as well, IIRC.

IF I went with the used engine, would you still recommend changing the bearings/piston rings as well? Of course, with everything else looking like it's in good shape.
Old 05-02-2016, 09:19 AM
  #6  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
teh CL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kelowna
Age: 36
Posts: 14,217
Received 999 Likes on 650 Posts
I did a quick price search for crank/rods/pistons out of a 09' MDX & your looking at $1200 US without shipping. That doesn't include main bearings or piston rings.

There's a 09' MDX motor with 185K KM for $1800 at Carcone's Auto Recycling in Aurora.

Old 05-02-2016, 11:08 AM
  #7  
Derek
Thread Starter
 
SykVSyx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Age: 51
Posts: 560
Received 143 Likes on 104 Posts
Originally Posted by teh CL
I did a quick price search for crank/rods/pistons out of a 09' MDX & your looking at $1200 US without shipping. That doesn't include main bearings or piston rings.

There's a 09' MDX motor with 185K KM for $1800 at Carcone's Auto Recycling in Aurora.

REALLY appreciate the research info, thank you.

Which site did you get that price quote from? Sounds like it may be cheaper than what I found from a US Acura parts site.

That mileage sounds high, I definitely don't want to pay the $2500 for the one that has 57k on it, and even with the exchange, $1200 is a good price.

Rings/bearings, from what I found weren't overly pricey, and if you found a site that has them cheaper, then .
Old 05-02-2016, 05:03 PM
  #8  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
teh CL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kelowna
Age: 36
Posts: 14,217
Received 999 Likes on 650 Posts
OEM parts were from hondaacuraonline.com

& 185k from a Honda motor is NOTHING :wink:
The following users liked this post:
SykVSyx (05-03-2016)
Old 05-03-2016, 09:21 AM
  #9  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by SykVSyx
Ah ok, little bit more of a drawn out process.

Sucks, because I have to order the parts from the US, pick them up and then order more again, and pick them up.

Oh well, part of the modding process, I guess.

Was also considering pickup up a used '13 MDX engine, it has 57k on it for $2500.

Thought that would be a bit of a waste though, because of all the parts I wouldn't be using from it.

Haven't priced out the crank/rods/pistons prices yet, but, I think it may actually be almost near that as well, IIRC.

IF I went with the used engine, would you still recommend changing the bearings/piston rings as well? Of course, with everything else looking like it's in good shape.
Yea, its a drawn out process but its the only way.

A used engine if you can get it for a really good price would work, BUT you would still need new crank to block bearings (they wouldnt match the color code on your existing block), depending on rod bearing conditions you may need those, and you would need new rings.

Also when you have your block machined make sure they DONT cross hatch the cyl walls. The 3.7 rings need a smooth bore.
The following users liked this post:
SykVSyx (05-03-2016)
Old 05-03-2016, 09:29 AM
  #10  
Derek
Thread Starter
 
SykVSyx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Age: 51
Posts: 560
Received 143 Likes on 104 Posts
The 'J37 Full Valvetrain' thread.....those heads can't be used on the J35a3, I assume?

Yeah, I figured I would have to replace the bearings/rings on a used engine, so, might as well buy new parts, and buy them cheaper.
Old 05-04-2016, 07:47 AM
  #11  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by SykVSyx
The 'J37 Full Valvetrain' thread.....those heads can't be used on the J35a3, I assume?

Yeah, I figured I would have to replace the bearings/rings on a used engine, so, might as well buy new parts, and buy them cheaper.
You wouldnt want those heads anyway. Our heads are more efficient and better. Though im not sure there is any upper head difference between the 2 that would restrict the valvetrain from bolting up like those?
Old 05-04-2016, 08:14 AM
  #12  
Derek
Thread Starter
 
SykVSyx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Age: 51
Posts: 560
Received 143 Likes on 104 Posts
Robert(yungone) had posted a reply in that thread and actually said those heads are great, but there is an issue with having to plug an oil hole.

I certainly respect both of your knowledge, so, any chance of a consensus on which heads are actually better for the J37 build? I also may have not fully understand the technical stuff about the performance differences between the J35 and the J37 heads, so, please forgive my ignorance.

I was also curious, if using the J37 heads, those wouldn't need to be ported, would they, since the are already from a J37?
Old 05-05-2016, 12:20 PM
  #13  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by SykVSyx
Robert(yungone) had posted a reply in that thread and actually said those heads are great, but there is an issue with having to plug an oil hole.

I certainly respect both of your knowledge, so, any chance of a consensus on which heads are actually better for the J37 build? I also may have not fully understand the technical stuff about the performance differences between the J35 and the J37 heads, so, please forgive my ignorance.

I was also curious, if using the J37 heads, those wouldn't need to be ported, would they, since the are already from a J37?
The heads are great compared to the J35a4 and up, especially on the larger intake port openings, But They all have the cast manifolds and compared to the J32A2/35A3 which have individual exhaust port openings, they cant flow as well as. The non cast exhaust manifolds are better exhaust wise and have better chance for more power/tunability with different style headers. Also IMHO they are also better for turbos. It seems as though the cast manifolds are more susceptible to detonation with those manifolds and boost.

And to answer your question about porting them. Just because they are 3.7 doesnt mean they dont need to be ported. Opening them up, smoothing transitions and castings out will help. Not to mention by doing so gives you the opportunity to gasket match for the best flow. The Jseries heads have been shown to flow at less than 500 lift as much or more than SB chevy heads that have had work done to them and more than 500 lift. Allowing them to flow only helps. These motors LOVE air.

Last edited by fsttyms1; 05-05-2016 at 12:24 PM.
The following users liked this post:
SykVSyx (05-06-2016)
Old 05-06-2016, 09:29 AM
  #14  
Derek
Thread Starter
 
SykVSyx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Age: 51
Posts: 560
Received 143 Likes on 104 Posts
Ok, thanks, Kris. The more I am learning about the J37 heads, it seems as though they are a bit more of a headache to deal with because of their design be well.

I am pretty sure my goal of 300whp will be attained using either heads. it's just a matter of how much work will be required to achieve it.
Old 05-06-2016, 11:52 AM
  #15  
3.5 psi
iTrader: (1)
 
gnuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Canada
Age: 41
Posts: 4,487
Received 798 Likes on 636 Posts
i agree you want the older heads and get those ported or gasket matched. How are you fitting a 90mm TB on? Are you going to add material to the manifold neck then enlarge the opening?

Also are you going to tune this thing? if so with what? You are staying auto right?

The only thing I remember about bisi cams is that they might not be properly heat treated and could be prone to early failure because of that. I think some J series cams will get you the power you want.
Old 05-07-2016, 09:07 PM
  #16  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
teh CL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kelowna
Age: 36
Posts: 14,217
Received 999 Likes on 650 Posts
The J37 heads are engineering porn

Dual vtec would definitely be an upgrade, especially tuned but they just aren't a walk in the park to make them work
Old 05-08-2016, 07:38 AM
  #17  
Derek
Thread Starter
 
SykVSyx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Age: 51
Posts: 560
Received 143 Likes on 104 Posts
P2R makes an adaptor and KTuned has the Mustang TB.

Yeah, the potential with the J37 heads is great, but I am going to get the heads ported.

I was originally thinking of getting the J37 IM, but I think I will use the J35 one instead and get that ported along with the headers.

Makes more sense (to me) to get the J35 IM ported since I want a bigger throttle body.
Old 05-09-2016, 08:32 AM
  #18  
3.5 psi
iTrader: (1)
 
gnuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Canada
Age: 41
Posts: 4,487
Received 798 Likes on 636 Posts
isn't the neck opening on the J37 larger than the J35? downside is the J37 is hard to port.
What's the budget on this build? If you can get some long tube headers made....but that's big $. I always thought we could use one of the TL long tube J pipes that ends in 3" and have a shop fabricate the primaries (heads to Jpipe).
Old 05-09-2016, 08:48 AM
  #19  
Derek
Thread Starter
 
SykVSyx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Age: 51
Posts: 560
Received 143 Likes on 104 Posts
Yes, I think the J37 has some design differences that would make it challenging.

I am just going to save myself the headache, and let the porting work (hopefully) do what it will to reach my goal.

So, sticking with the J35 intake manifold, and going along with the rest of the J37 parts I mentioned.

The J37 IM/heads would be an interesting route to take to see what the potential of it would be for my build, but, there are too many other requirements that would be a bit problematic to sort out....and problematic means more $$$.

The budget, well, there isn't a firm budget, but it is less than it would be to get the J37 IM/heads to run optimally.....since I am going with a shop to do the work.
Old 06-16-2016, 10:16 AM
  #20  
3.5 psi
iTrader: (1)
 
gnuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Canada
Age: 41
Posts: 4,487
Received 798 Likes on 636 Posts
I just creeped an ABP Aspec. Tranny is acting up. Would be perfect for a 3.5, ody, s/c Time to crunch some numbers.
Old 06-16-2016, 05:09 PM
  #21  
Intermediate
 
prove_it's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Sent you a PM about a 3.7 bottom end. Curious if this guy is still interested.
Old 05-25-2017, 02:24 PM
  #22  
3.5 psi
iTrader: (1)
 
gnuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Canada
Age: 41
Posts: 4,487
Received 798 Likes on 636 Posts
Any updates Derek?
The following users liked this post:
teh CL (05-25-2017)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AfilthyHOBO
Audio, Video, Electronics & Navigation
7
01-29-2020 04:12 AM
Burtch07
3G TL Photograph Gallery
399
06-05-2018 05:35 PM
coopcoop30
2G CL (2001-2003)
104
04-28-2017 09:03 PM
abovetheclouds
ILX
7
07-18-2016 01:51 PM
Punc
3G TL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
0
01-21-2016 05:51 PM



Quick Reply: J37 Build



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:29 AM.